Enhanced stability engineered WRINKLED1 transcription factor

ABSTRACT

The application describes stabilized WRINKLED1 transcription factors, as well as nucleic acids, and expression cassettes that encode and express such stabilized WRINKLED1 transcription factors and that are useful for increasing production of oils in plants and seeds.

PRIORITY

This Application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/187,419, filed Jul. 1, 2015, which application is incorporated by reference herein its entirety.

GOVERNMENT FUNDING

This invention was made with government support under DE-FCO2-07ER64494 awarded by the U.S. Department of Energy. The government has certain rights in the invention.

SEQUENCE LISTING

This document incorporates by reference herein an electronic sequence listing text file, which is filed in electronic format via EFS-Web. The text file is named “1593761.TXT,” is 77,824 bytes, and was created on Jun. 28, 2016.

BACKGROUND

Plant oils such as triacylglycerols (TAGs) are useful for food, industrial feedstock and biofuel production. TAG is generally harvested from the seeds of oil crop species, such as canola. However, engineering of crops that product oils in non-seed tissues (leaves and roots) is an alternative way to produce feed stocks for high energy transportation biofuels or even jet fuels.

Fuels are typically produced from petroleum products, but such production involves considerable cost, both financially and environmentally. Sources of petroleum must be discovered, but petroleum exploration is an expensive and risky venture. The cost of exploring deep water wells can exceed $100 million. In addition to the economic cost, petroleum exploration carries a high environmental cost. For example, offshore exploration frequently disturbs the surrounding marine environments.

After a productive well is discovered, the petroleum must be extracted from the Earth, but such extraction is expensive and, even under the best circumstances, only 50% of the petroleum in a well can be extracted. Petroleum extraction also carries an environmental cost. For example, petroleum extraction can result in large seepages of petroleum rising to the surface. Offshore drilling involves dredging the seabed which disrupts or destroys the surrounding marine environment.

After extraction, petroleum must be transported over great distances from petroleum producing regions to petroleum consuming regions. In addition to the shipping costs, there is also the environmental risk of oil spills.

In its natural form, crude petroleum extracted from the Earth has few commercial uses. It is a mixture of hydrocarbons (e.g., paraffins (or alkanes), olefins (or alkenes), alkynes, napthenes (or cycloalkanes), aliphatic compounds, aromatic compounds, etc.) of varying length and complexity. In addition, crude petroleum contains other organic compounds (e.g., organic compounds containing nitrogen, oxygen, sulfur, etc.) and impurities (e.g., sulfur, salt, acid, metals, etc.). Hence, crude petroleum must be refined and purified before it can be used commercially.

Due to the challenges posed by petroleum, there is a need for a renewable petroleum source which does not need to be located by extensive exploration, dangerous extraction methods, transportation over long distances, or extensive refinement processes. There is also a need for a renewable oil source that can be produced economically without environmental damage.

SUMMARY

The invention relates to stabilized WRINKLED1 transcription factors, as well as to nucleic acids and expression cassettes that encode and express such stabilized WRINKLED1 transcription factors. The WRINKLED1 (WRI1) transcription factor is a key regulator of plant oil biosynthesis. When expressed in plants, the stabilized WRINKLED1 transcription factors are useful for increasing production of oils in plants and seeds. As illustrated herein, one of the intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) in WRINKLED1 can be modified to stabilize the WRINKLED protein to increase its half-life and increase its activity. Modifications of WRINKLED that successfully increase its stability include mutations in the C-terminal PEST domain or removal of the PEST domain of WRINKLED. For example, as illustrated herein, mutations in phosphorylation sites within the WRINKLED C-terminal PEST domain resulted in a more stable transcription factor, and when the stabilized WRINKLED factor was transiently expressed in plant leaves, those leaves had increased oil biosynthesis. Transgenic plants overexpressing engineered WRINKLED (e.g., with phosphorylation site mutations) resulted in increased seed oil content compared to transgenic plants expressing wild type WRINKLED. Similarly, plants expressing a C-terminally truncated WRINKLED transcription factor also had increased oil content in plant leaves.

DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

FIG. 1 illustrates that there are three main intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) in the Arabidopsis thaliana WRINKLED1 (AtWRI1) transcription factor that are predicted by three different programs. Panel A is a schematic diagram of AtWRI1. Panel B illustrates the disorder of AtWRI1 as predicted by PONDR-VL3. Panel C illustrates the disorder of AtWRI1 as predicted by RONN. Panel D illustrates the disorder of AtWRI1 as predicted by PONDR-FIT. Panel E graphically illustrates the amino acid composition of AtWRI1. The full length AtWRI1 protein sequence was analyzed by Composition Profiler (see website at cprofiler.org). The SwissProt 51 dataset was chosen as a background dataset. Panel F graphically illustrates the overall disorder as predicted by PONDR VL3. Panel G summarizes the three main IDRs predicted in AtWRI1 by the different programs.

FIG. 2 shows that the C-terminal portion of AtWRI1 regulates protein stability. Panel A shows confocal images of cells transiently expressing YFP fused AtWRI1 (WT form) and AtWRI1 truncated variants in N. benthamiana leaves. Panel B shows the YFP fluorescence intensity of AtWRI1 and its variants in the cells of N. benthamiana leaves. Panel C graphically illustrates the fatty acid content of seeds of WT, wri1-1 and transgenic wri1-1 that express YFP-AtWRI1. Results are mean±SE (n=3).

FIG. 3A-3B illustrates a correlation between the structure and the domains that affect the transactivation activity of WRI1. FIG. 3A is a schematic diagram of the AtWRI1 structure. The following sequence (SEQ ID NO:65) illustrates the positions of acidic amino acids (identified in bold and with underlining) within the C-terminal region of WRI1.

307       AAVV NCCI D SSTIM  E M D RCG D NN E  LAWNFCMM D T 341 GFSPFLT D QN LAN E NPI E YP  E LFN E LAF ED  NI D PMF DD GK 381 H E CLNL E NL D  CCVVGR E SPP SSSSPLSCLS T D SASSTTTT 421 TTSVSCNYLV

FIG. 3B graphically illustrates the transactivation activity of AtWRI1 and of AtWRI1 deletion mutants in yeast. Full-length AtWRI1¹⁻⁴³⁰ and AtWRI1 truncated variants were fused to yeast GAL4 DNA binding domain (BD). Colony-lift filter assay and β-galactosidase assay of liquid cultures were used to measure the transactivation activity. Results are shown as mean±SE (n=3). As illustrated, there was no transactivation activity of AtWRI1¹⁻³⁰⁶ carrying a deletion of the C-terminal 124 amino acids, but a C-terminal domain, AtWRI1³⁰⁷⁻³⁹⁷ (without N-terminal 1-306 amino acids) displayed transcriptional activity similar to wild-type AtWRI1.

FIGS. 4A-4G show that the C-terminally truncated AtWRI1¹⁻³⁹⁷ protein displayed less degradation compared to AtWRI1 wild type (WT). FIG. 4A shows electro-phoretically separated GST-AtWRI1 proteins subjected to degradation in WT protein extracts in cell-free degradation in vitro assay. The MG132 proteasome inhibitor (10 μM) was added into some WT protein extracts as indicated. After GST purification, two protein bands were eluted for GST-AtWRI1. Protein mass spectrometry confirmed that both bands correspond to GST-AtWRI1 protein. However, only one band was observed for GST-AtWRI1¹⁻³⁹⁷. This difference might result from different protein modifications in E. coli associated with the IDR3 of AtWRI1. FIG. 4B graphically illustrates the percent remaining of the GST-AtWRI1 and GST-AtWRI1¹⁻³⁹⁷ proteins as detected by western blot signal during the cell-free degradation assay. Image analysis indicated similar degradation patterns when the double bands of GST-AtWRI1 were analyzed individually. FIG. 4C graphically illustrates that transient production of the C-terminally truncated YFP-AtWRI1¹⁻³⁹⁷ protein in N. benthamiana leaves generated leaves with approximately 2 fold higher TAG content than in leaves expressing YFP-AtWRI1. FIG. 4D shows confocal images illustrating the fluorescence of YFP fused AtWRI1 and AtWRI1 phosphorylation-deficient mutant AtWRI1^(S398A/S401A/S402A/S407A/S415A/S416A/T420A/T421A/T422A/S423A) (AtWRI1^(PEST/AA); SEQ ID NO:30) proteins in N. benthamiana leaves. FIG. 4E graphically illustrates TAG content in N. benthamiana leaves that transiently express AtWRI1 or AtWRI1^(PEST/AA). Empty vector (EV) is used as a control. Results are shown as mean±SE (n=3). FIG. 4F shows confocal images illustrating the fluorescence of YFP-fused AtWRI1 and AtWRI1 phosphorylation mimic mutant (AtWRI1^(S398D/S401D/S402D/S407D/S415D/S416D/T420D/T421D/T422D/S423D) (AtWRI1^(PEST/DD); SEQ ID NO:31) protein in N. benthamiana leaves. FIG. 4G graphically illustrates TAG content in N. benthamiana leaves that transiently express YFP fused AtWRI1 and AtWRI1^(PEST/DD) proteins. Results are shown as means±SE (n=3).

FIG. 5 graphically illustrates the total fatty acid content of seeds of WT, wri1-1 and transgenic wri1-1 plants that express AtWRI1 and AtWRI1^(PEST/AA). Results are the mean±SE (n=3). Average of total fatty acid content of transgenic wri1-1 lines expressing AtWRI1 and AtWRI1^(PEST/AA) are indicated respectively. The letters “a” and “b” indicate significant difference (P<0.05, t-test, and one-way ANOVA, respectively) between transgenic wri1-1 lines expressing AtWRI1^(PEST/AA), and transgenic wri1-1 lines expressing AtWRI1.

FIG. 6A-6B illustrate the function of AtWRI1 phosphorylation deficient and phosphorylation mimic mutants in N. benthamiana transient expression assays. The expressed proteins were the phosphorylation deficient protein AtWRI1^(S398A/S401A/S402A/S407A) (AtWRI1^(4SA); SEQ ID NO:62) fused to YFP and the phosphorylation mimic mutant AtWRI1^(S398D/S401D/S402D/S407D) (AtWRI1^(4SD); SEQ ID NO:64) fused to YFP. FIG. 6A shows confocal images of N. benthamiana cells expressing YFP fused AtWRI1, AtWRI1^(S398A/S401A/S402A/S407A) (AtWRI1^(4SA)) and AtWRI1^(S398D/S401D/S402D/S407D) (AtWRI1^(4SD)) proteins. FIG. 6B graphically illustrates TAG content in N. benthamiana leaves that transiently express YFP fused AtWRI1 and AtWRI1 mutants. Results are shown as mean±SE (n=3).

FIG. 7 graphically illustrates the percent dry weight of TAG detected in transient expression assays of N. benthamiana leaves expressing AtWRI1 mutants AtWRI1^(P399A/P400A/P405A) (AtWRI1^(P3A)) and AtWRI1^(P399L/P400L/P405L)(AtWRI1^(P3L)) that were fused to YFP. Results are shown as mean±SE (n=3-4).

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The invention relates to stabilized WRINKLED transcription factors, nucleic acids encoding such stabilized transcription factors, as well as transgenic cells, seeds and plants that have such stabilized transcription factors or nucleic acids that encode the stabilized transcription factors. Plants having such stabilized transcription factors produce more oil in their seeds and tissues than corresponding native (wild type) plants. Accordingly, the invention also relates to methods of generating and using such plants or seedlings, for example, to generate oil.

Wrinkled

One useful function for the WRINKLED1 (WRI1) transcription factor is to increase the accumulation of triacylglycerols (TAGs) in plants and their seeds. Overexpression of WRI1 can up-regulate a set of genes involved in fatty acid (FA) synthesis including, for example, genes for a subunit of pyruvate kinase (Pl-PKβ1), acetyl-CoA carboxylase (BCCP2), acyl carrier protein (ACP1), and ketoacyl-acyl carrier protein synthase (KAS1). WRI1 can bind to upstream sequences in such genes and may have a number of upstream binding sites. For example, workers have observed that seven different WRI1 binding sites share a sequence [CnTnG](n)₇[CG], where n is any nucleotide; this sequence has been designated the AW-box (Maeo et al., The Plant Journal 60: 476-487 (2009)). WRI1 facilitates synthesis of plant carbons into oil by activating genes involved in oil synthesis.

As described herein, WRINKLED1 is a transcription factor that can increase the synthesis of proteins involved in oil synthesis. Modification of plants to express increased levels of stabilized WRINKLED1 transcription factors can further increase the oil content of seeds and non-seed tissues (e.g., leaves, stalks and roots) in a variety of transgenic plants. Plants can be generated as described herein to include WRINKLED1 nucleic acids that encode stabilized WRINKLED transcription factors. Plants are especially desirable when the WRINKLED1 nucleic acids are operably linked to control sequences capable of WRINKLED1 expression in a multitude of plant tissues, or in selected tissues and during selected parts of the plant life cycle to optimize the synthesis of oil. Such control sequences are typically heterologous to the coding region of the WRINKLED1 nucleic acids.

One example of an amino acid sequence for a WRINKLED1 (WRI1) sequence from Arabidopsis thaliana is available as accession number AAP80382.1 (GI:32364685), and is reproduced below as SEQ ID NO:1.

  1 MKKRLTTSTC SSSPSSSVSS STTTSSPIQS EAPRPKRAKR  41 AKKSSPSGDK SHNPTSPAST RRSSIYRGVT RHRWTGRFEA  81 HLWDKSSWNS IQNKKGKQVY LGAYDSEEAA AHTYDLAALK 121 YWGPDTILNF PAETYTKELE EMQRVTKEEY LASLRRQSSG 161 FSRGVSKYRG VARHHHNGRW EARIGRVFGN KYLYLGTYNT 201 QEEAAAAYDM AAIEYRGANA VTNFDISNYI DRLKKKGVFP 241 FPVNQANHQE GILVEAKQEV ETREAKEEPR EEVKQQYVEE 281 PPQEEEEKEE EKAEQQEAEI VGYSEEAAVV NCCIDSSTIM 301 EMDRCGDNNE LAWNFCMMDT GFSPFLTDQN LANENPIEYP 361 ELFNELAFED NIDFMFDDGK HECLNLENLD CCVVGRESPP 401 SSSSPLSCLS TDSASSTTTT TTSVSCNYLV A nucleic acid sequence for the above Arabidopsis thaliana WRI1 protein is available as accession number AY254038.2 (GI:51859605), and is reproduced below as SEQ ID NO:2.

   1 AAACCACTCT GCTTCCTCTT CCTCTGAGAA ATCAAATCAC   41 TCACACTCCA AAAAAAAATC TAAACTTTCT CAGAGTTTAA   81 TGAAGAAGCG CTTAACCACT TCCACTTGTT CTTCTTCTCC  121 ATCTTCCTCT GTTTCTTCTT CTACTACTAC TTCCTCTCCT  161 ATTCAGTCGG AGGCTCCAAG GCCTAAACGA GCCAAAAGGG  201 CTAAGAAATC TTCTCCTTCT GGTGATAAAT CTCATAACCC  241 GACAAGCCCT GCTTCTACCC GACGCAGCTC TATCTACAGA  281 GGAGTCACTA GACATAGATG GACTGGGAGA TTCGAGGCTC  301 ATCTTTGGGA CAAAAGCTCT TGGAATTCGA TTCAGAACAA  361 GAAAGGCAAA CAAGTTTATC TGGGAGCATA TGACAGTGAA  401 GAAGCAGCAG CACATACGTA CGATCTGGCT GCTCTCAAGT  421 ACTGGGGACC CGACACCATC TTGAATTTTC CGGCAGAGAC  481 GTACACAAAG GAATTGGAAG AAATGCAGAG AGTGACAAAG  521 GAAGAATATT TGGCTTCTCT CCGCCGCCAG AGCAGTGGTT  581 TCTCCAGAGG CGTCTCTAAA TATCGCGGCG TCGCTAGGCA  601 TCACCACAAC GGAAGATGGG AGGCTCGGAT CGGAAGAGTG  641 TTTGGGAACA AGTACTTGTA CCTCGGCACC TATAATACGC  681 AGGAGGAAGC TGCTGCAGCA TATGACATGG CTGCGATTGA  721 GTATCGAGGC GCAAACGCGG TTACTAATTT CGACATTAGT  761 AATTACATTG ACCGGTTAAA GAAGAAAGGT GTTTTCCCGT  801 TCCCTGTGAA CCAAGCTAAC CATCAAGAGG GTATTCTTGT  841 TGAAGCCAAA CAAGAAGTTG AAACGAGAGA AGCGAAGGAA  881 GAGCCTAGAG AAGAAGTGAA ACAACAGTAC GTGGAAGAAC  921 CACCGCAAGA AGAAGAAGAG AAGGAAGAAG AGAAAGCAGA  961 GCAACAAGAA GCAGAGATTG TAGGATATTC AGAAGAAGCA 1001 GCAGTGGTCA ATTGCTGCAT AGACTCTTCA ACCATAATGG 1041 AAATGGATCG TTGTGGGGAC AACAATGAGC TGGCTTGGAA 1081 CTTCTGTATG ATGGATACAG GGTTTTCTCC GTTTTTGACT 1121 GATCAGAATC TCGCGAATGA GAATCCCATA GAGTATCCGG 1141 AGCTATTCAA TGAGTTAGCA TTTGAGGACA ACATCGACTT 1201 CATGTTCGAT GATGGGAAGC ACGAGTGCTT GAACTTGGAA 1241 AATCTGGATT GTTGCGTGGT GGGAAGAGAG AGCCCACCCT 1281 CTTCTTCTTC ACCATTGTCT TGCTTATCTA CTGACTCTGC 1321 TTCATCAACA ACAACAACAA CAACCTCGGT TTCTTGTAAC 1361 TATTTGGTCT GAGAGAGAGA GCTTTGCCTT CTAGTTTGAA 1401 TTTCTATTTC TTCCGCTTCT TCTTCTTTTT TTTCTTTTGT 1441 TGGGTTCTGC TTAGGGTTTG TATTTCAGTT TCAGGGCTTG 1481 TTCGTTGGTT CTGAATAATC AATGTCTTTG CCCCTTTTCT 1501 AATGGGTACC TGAAGGGCGA

A PEST domain that has an amino acid sequence enriched in proline (P), glutamic acid (E), serine (S), and threonine (T)) is associated with intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs). As described herein, removal of the C-terminal PEST domain or mutations in putative phosphorylation sites with such C-terminal PEST domains results in a more stable WRINKLED transcription factors and increased oil biosynthesis by plants expressing such deleted or mutated WRINKLED transcription factors.

The PEST domain of the Arabidopsis thaliana protein with SEQ ID NO:1 can have deletions or mutations in the following PEST sequence (SEQ ID NO:3).

396  RESPP SSSSPLSCLS TDSASSTTTT TTSVSCNYLV. For example, expression of a C-terminally truncated Arabidopsis thaliana WRI1 protein or an Arabidopsis thaliana WRI1 protein with at least four mutations at any of positions 398, 401, 402, 407, 415, 416, 420, 421, 422, and/or 423 increases the content of triacylglycerol in plant tissues such as leaves and seeds. Hence, one aspect of the invention is a mutant WRI1 protein that includes a mutation (substitution, insertion, or deletion) in the following sequence (SEQ ID NO: 4):

396 REXPP XXSSPLXCLS TDSAXXTTTX XXXVSCNYLV. where at least four of the X residues in the SEQ ID NO:4 sequence is a substitution, insertion, or deletion compared to the wild type sequence (SEQ ID NO:3). The X residues are not acidic amino acids such as aspartic acid or glutamic acid. However, the X residue can be a small amino acid or a hydrophobic amino acid. For example, the X residues can each separately be alanine, glycine, valine, leucine, isoleucine, methionine, or any mixture thereof. As illustrated herein, WRI1 proteins with an alanine instead of a serine or a threonine at each of positions 398, 401, 402, and 407 have increased stability and, when expressed in plant cells, the cells produce more triacylglycerols than do wild type plants that do not express such a mutant WRI1 protein.

Another aspect of the invention is a mutant WRI1 protein with a truncation at the C terminus of at least 5, or at least 7, or at least 10, or at least 13, or at least 15, or at least 17, or at least 20, or at least 25, or at least 30, or at least 35, or at least 40, or at least 45 amino acids. For example, such deletions can be within the SEQ ID NO:3 portion of the WRI1 protein. Such mutant WRI1 proteins can be expressed in plant tissues to increase the oil/fatty acid/TAG content of those tissues.

Other types of WRI1 proteins also have utility for increasing the oil/fatty acid/TAG content of plant tissues.

For example, an amino acid sequence for a WRINKLED1 (WRI1) sequence from Brassica napus is available as accession number ADO16346.1 (GI:308193634). This Brassica napus WRINKLED1 sequence is reproduced below as SEQ ID NO:5.

  1 MKRPLTTSPS TSSSTSSSAC ILPTQPETPR PKRAKRAKKS  41 SIPTDVKPQN PTSPASTRRS SIYRGVTRHR WTGRYEAHLW  81 DKSSWNSIQN KKGKQVYLGA YDSEEAAAHT YDLAALKYWG 121 PDTILNFPAE TYTKELEEMQ RCTKEEYLAS LRRQSSGFSR 161 GVSKYRGVAR HHHNGRWEAR IGRVFGNKYL YLGTYNTQEE 201 AAAAYDMAAI EYRGANAVTN FDISNYIDRL KKKGVFPFPV 241 SQANHQEAVL AEAKQEVEAK EEPTEEVKQC VEKEEPQEAK 281 EEKTEKKQQQ QEVEEAVVTC CIDSSESNEL AWDFCMMDSG 301 FAPFLTDSNL SSENPIEYPE LFNEMGFEDN IDFMFEEGKQ 361 DCLSLENLDC CDGVVVVGRE SPTSLSSSPL SCLSTDSASS 401 TTTTTITSVS CNYSV A nucleic acid sequence for the above Brassica napus WRI1 protein is available as accession number HM370542.1 (GI:308193633), and is reproduced below as SEQ ID NO:6.

   1 ATGAAGAGAC CCTTAACCAC TTCTCCTTCT ACCTCCTCTT   41 CTACTTCTTC TTCGGCTTGT ATACTTCCGA CTCAACCAGA   61 GACTCCAAGG CCCAAACGAG CCAAAAGGGC TAAGAAATCT  121 TCTATTCCTA CTGATGTTAA ACCACAGAAT CCCACCAGTC  161 CTGCCTCCAC CAGACGCAGC TCTATCTACA GAGGAGTCAC  201 TAGACATAGA TGGACAGGGA GATACGAGGC TCATCTATGG  241 GACAAAAGCT CGTGGAATTC GATTCAGAAC AAGAAAGGCA  281 AACAAGTTTA TCTGGGAGCA TATGACAGCG AGGAAGCAGC  321 AGCGCATACG TACGATCTAG CTGCTCTCAA GTACTGGGGT  361 CCCGACACCA TCTTGAACTT TCCGGCTGAG ACGTACACAA  401 AGGAGTTGGA GGAGATGCAG AGATGTACAA AGGAAGAGTA  441 TTTGGCTTCT CTCCGCCGCC AGAGCAGTGG TTTCTCTAGA  481 GGCGTCTCTA AATATCGCGG CGTCGCCAGG CATCACCATA  521 ACGGAAGATG GGAAGCTAGG ATTGGAAGGG TGTTTGGAAA  541 CAAGTACTTG TACCTCGGCA CTTATAATAC GCAGGAGGAA  601 GCTGCAGCTG CATATGACAT GGCGGCTATA GAGTACAGAG  641 GCGCAAACGC AGTGACCAAC TTCGACATTA GTAACTACAT  681 CGACCGGTTA AAGAAAAAAG GTGTCTTCCC ATTCCCTGTG  721 AGCCAAGCCA ATCATCAAGA AGCTGTTCTT GCTGAAGCCA  761 AACAAGAAGT GGAAGCTAAA GAAGAGCCTA CAGAAGAAGT  801 GAAGCAGTGT GTCGAAAAAG AAGAACCGCA AGAAGCTAAA  841 GAAGAGAAGA CTGAGAAAAA ACAACAACAA CAAGAAGTGG  881 AGGAGGCGGT GGTCACTTGC TGCATTGATT CTTCGGAGAG  921 CAATGAGCTG GCTTGGGACT TCTGTATGAT GGATTCAGGG  961 TTTGCTCCGT TTTTGACGGA TTCAAATCTC TCGAGTGAGA 1001 ATCCCATTGA GTATCCTGAG CTTTTCAATG AGATGGGGTT 1041 TGAGGATAAC ATTGACTTCA TGTTCGAGGA AGGGAAGCAA 1081 GACTGCTTGA GCTTGGAGAA TCTGGATTGT TGCGATGGTG 1121 TTGTTGTGGT GGGAAGAGAG AGCCCAACTT CATTGTCGTC 1161 TTCACCGTTG TCTTGCTTGT CTACTGACTC TGCTTCATCA 1201 ACAACAACAA CAACAATAAC CTCTGTTTCT TGTAACTATT 1241 CTGTCTGA

Expression of a C-terminally truncated Brassica napus WRI1 protein or an Brassica napus WRI1 protein with a mutation (e.g., substitution, insertion, or deletion) at four or more of positions 381, 383, 384, 386, 387, 388, 391, 399, 400, 401, 402, 403, 404, 405, 407, or 408 can increase the content of triacylglycerol in plant tissues such as leaves and seeds. Hence, one aspect of the invention is a mutant WRI1 protein that includes a mutation (substitution, insertion, or deletion) in the following sequence (SEQ ID NO: 7):

379 RE  S P TS L SSS PL  S CLSTDSA SS   TTTTT I TS VS CNYSV

For example, expression of a C-terminally truncated Brassica napus WRI1 protein or a Brassica napus WRI1 protein with at least four mutations (substitution, insertion, or deletion) at any of positions 381, 383, 384, 386, 387, 388, 391, 399, 400, 401, 402, 403, 404, 405, 407, and/or 408 can increase the content of triacylglycerol in plant tissues such as leaves and seeds. Hence, another aspect of the invention is a mutant WRI1 protein that includes the following sequence (SEQ ID NO: 8):

RE XPXXLXXXPL XCLSTDSAXX XXXXXIXXVS CNYSV where at least four of the X residues in the SEQ ID NO:8 sequence is a substitution, insertion, or deletion compared to the wild type sequence (SEQ ID NO:7). The X residues are not acidic amino acids such as aspartic acid or glutamic acid. However, the X residue can be a small amino acid or a hydrophobic amino acid. For example, the X residues can each separately be alanine, glycine, valine, leucine, isoleucine, methionine, or any mixture thereof.

Another aspect of the invention is a mutant WRI1 protein with a truncation at the C terminus of the SEQ ID NO:5 (or from the SEQ ID NO:7) sequence of at least 4, or at least 5, or at least 7, or at least 10, or at least 13, or at least 15, or at least 17, or at least 20, or at least 25, or at least 30, or at least 35, or at least 40, or at least 45 amino acids. Such mutant WRI1 proteins can be expressed in plant tissues to increase the oil/fatty acid/TAG content of those tissues.

Another example of an amino acid sequence for a WRINKLED1 (WRI1) sequence from Brassica napus is available as accession number ABD16282.1 (GI:87042570), and is reproduced below as SEQ ID NO:9.

  1 MKRPLTTSPS SSSSTSSSAC ILPTQSETPR PKRAKRAKKS  41 SLRSDVKPQN PTSPASTRRS SIYRGVTRHR WTGRYEAHLW  81 DKSSWNSIQN KKGKQVYLGA YDSEEAAAHT YDLAALKYWG 121 PNTILNFPVE TYTKELEEMQ RCTKEEYLAS LRRQSSGFSR 161 GVSKYRGVAR HHHNGRWEAR IGRVFGNKYL YLGTYNTQEE 201 AAAAYDMAAI EYRGANAVTN FDIGNYIDRL KKKGVFPFPV 241 SQANHQEAVL AETKQEVEAK EEPTEEVKQC VEKEEAKEEK 281 TEKKQQQEVE EAVITCCIDS SESNELAWDF CMMDSGFAPF 321 LTDSNLSSEN PIEYPELFNE MGFEDNIDFM FEEGKQDCLS 361 LENLDCCDGV VVVGRESPTS LSSSPLSCLS TDSASSTTTT 401 ATTVTSVSWN YSV

A nucleic acid sequence for the above Brassica napus WRI1 protein is available as accession number DQ370141.1 (GI:87042569), and is reproduced below as SEQ ID NO:10.

   1 ATGAAGAGAC CCTTAACCAC TTCTCCTTCT TCCTCCTCTT   41 CTACTTCTTC TTCGGCCTGT ATACTTCCGA CTCAATCAGA   61 GACTCCAAGG CCCAAACGAG CCAAAAGGGC TAAGAAATCT  121 TCTCTGCGTT CTGATGTTAA ACCACAGAAT CCCACCAGTC  161 CTGCCTCCAC CAGACGCAGC TCTATCTACA GAGGAGTCAC  181 TAGACATAGA TGGACAGGGA GATACGAAGC TCATCTATGG  241 GACAAAAGCT CGTGGAATTC GATTCAGAAC AAGAAAGGCA  281 AACAAGTTTA TCTGGGAGCA TATGACAGCG AGGAAGCAGC  321 AGCACATACG TACGATCTAG CTGCTCTCAA GTACTGGGGT  361 CCCAACACCA TCTTGAACTT TCCGGTTGAG ACGTACACAA  401 AGGAGCTGGA GGAGATGCAG AGATGTACAA AGGAAGAGTA  441 TTTGGCTTCT CTCCGCCGCC AGAGCAGTGG TTTCTCTAGA  481 GGCGTCTCTA AATATCGCGG CGTCGCCAGG CATCACCATA  521 ATGGAAGATG GGAAGCTCGG ATTGGAAGGG TGTTTGGAAA  541 CAAGTACTTG TACCTCGGCA CCTATAATAC GCAGGAGGAA  601 GCTGCAGCTG CATATGACAT GGCGGCTATA GAGTACAGAG  641 GTGCAAACGC AGTGACCAAC TTCGACATTG GTAACTACAT  681 CGACCGGTTA AAGAAAAAAG GTGTCTTCCC GTTCCCCGTG  721 AGCCAAGCTA ATCATCAAGA AGCTGTTCTT GCTGAAACCA  761 AACAAGAAGT GGAAGCTAAA GAAGAGCCTA CAGAAGAAGT  801 GAAGCAGTGT GTCGAAAAAG AAGAAGCTAA AGAAGAGAAG  841 ACTGAGAAAA AACAACAACA AGAAGTGGAG GAGGCGGTGA  881 TCACTTGCTG CATTGATTCT TCAGAGAGCA ATGAGCTGGC  921 TTGGGACTTC TGTATGATGG ATTCAGGGTT TGCTCCGTTT  961 TTGACTGATT CAAATCTCTC GAGTGAGAAT CCCATTGAGT 1001 ATCCTGAGCT TTTCAATGAG ATGGGTTTTG AGGATAACAT 1041 TGACTTCATG TTCGAGGAAG GGAAGCAAGA CTGCTTGAGC 1081 TTGGAGAATC TTGATTGTTG CGATGGTGTT GTTGTGGTGG 1121 GAAGAGAGAG CCCAACTTCA TTGTCGTCTT CTCCGTTGTC 1141 CTGCTTGTCT ACTGACTCTG CTTCATCAAC AACAACAACA 1201 GCAACAACAG TAACCTCTGT TTCTTGGAAC TATTCTGTCT 1241 GA

Expression of a C-terminally truncated Brassica napus WRI1 protein or a Brassica napus WRI1 protein with a mutation at four or more of positions 381, 383, 384, 385, 387, 388, 391, 394, 399, 400, 401, 402, 403, 404, 406, 407, 409, and/or 410 can increase the content of triacylglycerol in plant tissues such as leaves and seeds. Hence, one aspect of the invention is a mutant WRI1 protein that includes a mutation (substitution, insertion, or deletion) in the following sequence (SEQ ID NO:11):

379 RE  S P TS L S SSPL  S CL S TDSA SS   TTTT A TT V TS  VSWN

For example, expression of a C-terminally truncated Brassica napus WRI1 protein or a Brassica napus WRI1 protein with at least four mutations at any of positions 381, 383, 384, 385, 387, 388, 391, 394, 399, 400, 401, 402, 403, 404, 406, 407, 409, and/or 410 can increase the content of triacylglycerol in plant tissues such as leaves and seeds. Hence, another aspect of the invention is a mutant WRI1 protein that includes the following sequence (SEQ ID NO: 12):

379 RE XPXXLXSSPL XCLXTDSAXX XXXXAXXVXX VSWN where at least four of the X residues in the SEQ ID NO:12 sequence is a substitution, insertion, or deletion compared to the wild type sequence (SEQ ID NO:11). The X residues are not acidic amino acids such as aspartic acid or glutamic acid. However, the X residue can be a small amino acid or a hydrophobic amino acid. For example, the X residues can each separately be alanine, glycine, valine, leucine, isoleucine, methionine, or any mixture thereof.

Another aspect of the invention is a mutant WRI1 protein with a truncation at the C terminus of the SEQ ID NO:9 (or from the SEQ ID NO:11) sequence of at least 4, or at least 5, or at least 7, or at least 10, or at least 13, or at least 15, or at least 17, or at least 20, or at least 25, or at least 30, or at least 35, or at least 40, or at least 45 amino acids. Such mutant WRI1 proteins can be expressed in plant tissues to increase the oil/fatty acid/TAG content of those tissues.

Other Brassica napus amino acid and cDNA WRINKLED1 (WRI1) sequences are available as accession numbers ABD72476.1 (GI:89357185) and DQ402050.1 (GI:89357184), respectively.

An example of an amino acid sequence for a WRINKLED1 (WRI1) sequence from Zea mays is available as accession number ACG32367.1 (GI:195621074), and reproduced below as SEQ ID NO:13.

  1 MERSQRQSPP PPSPSSSSSS VSADTVLVPP GKRRRAATAK  41 AGAEPNKRIR KDPAAAAAGK RSSVYRGVTR HRWTGRFEAH  81 LWDKHCLAAL HNKKKGRQVY LGAYDSEEAA ARAYDLAALK 121 YWGPETLLNF PVEDYSSEMP EMEAVSREEY LASLRRRSSG 161 FSRGVSKYRG VARHHHNGRW EARIGRVFGN KYLYLGTFDT 201 QEEAAKAYDL AAIEYRGVNA VTNFDISCYL DHPLFLAQLQ 241 QEPQVVPALN QEPQPDQSET GTTEQEPESS EAKTPDGSAE 281 PDENAVPDDT AEPLSTVDDS IEEGLWSPCM DYELDTMSRP 321 NFGSSINLSE WFADADFDCN IGCLFDGCSA ADEGSKDGVG 361 LADFSLFEAG DVQLKDVLSD MEEGIQPPAM ISVCN

A nucleic acid sequence for the above Zea mays WRI1 protein sequence is available as accession number EU960249.1 (GI:195621073), and is reproduced below as SEQ ID NO:14.

   1 CTCCCCCGCC TCGCCGCCAG TCAGATTCAC CACCGGCTCC   41 CCTGCACAAC CGCGTCCGCG CTGCACCACC ACCGTTCATC   81 GAGGAGGAGG GGGGACGGAG ACCACGGACA TGGAGAGATC  121 TCAACGGCAG TCTCCTCCGC CACCGTCGCC GTCCTCCTCC  161 TCGTCCTCCG TCTCCGCGGA CACCGTCCTC GTCCCTCCCG  201 GAAAGAGGCG GAGGGCGGCG ACGGCCAAGG CCGGCGCCGA  241 GCCTAATAAG AGGATCCGCA AGGACCCCGC CGCCGCCGCC  281 GCGGGGAAGA GGAGCTCCGT CTACAGGGGA GTCACCAGGC  321 ACAGGTGGAC GGGCAGGTTC GAGGCGCATC TCTGGGACAA  361 GCACTGCCTC GCCGCGCTCC ACAACAAGAA GAAAGGCAGG  401 CAAGTCTACC TGGGGGCGTA TGACAGCGAG GAGGCAGCTG  441 CTCGTGCCTA TGACCTCGCA GCTCTCAAGT ACTGGGGTCC  481 TGAGACTCTG CTCAACTTCC CTGTGGAGGA TTACTCCAGC  521 GAGATGCCGG AGATGGAGGC CGTTTCCCGG GAGGAGTACC  561 TGGCCTCCCT CCGCCGCAGG AGCAGCGGCT TCTCCAGGGG  601 CGTCTCCAAG TACAGAGGCG TCGCCAGGCA TCACCACAAC  641 GGGAGGTGGG AGGCACGGAT TGGGCGAGTC TTTGGGAACA  681 AGTACCTCTA CTTGGGAACA TTTGACACTC AAGAAGAGGC  721 AGCCAAGGCC TATGACCTTG CGGCCATTGA ATACCGTGGC  761 GTCAATGCTG TAACCAACTT CGACATCAGC TGCTACCTGG  801 ACCACCCGCT GTTCCTGGCA CAGCTCCAAC AGGAGCCACA  841 GGTGGTGCCG GCACTCAACC AAGAACCTCA ACCTGATCAG  881 AGCGAAACCG GAACTACAGA GCAAGAGCCG GAGTCAAGCG  921 AAGCCAAGAC ACCGGATGGC AGTGCAGAAC CCGATGAGAA  961 CGCGGTGCCT GACGACACCG CGGAGCCCCT CAGCACAGTC 1001 GACGACAGCA TCGAAGAGGG CTTGTGGAGC CCTTGCATGG 1041 ATTACGAGCT AGACACCATG TCGAGACCAA ACTTTGGCAG 1081 CTCAATCAAT CTGAGCGAGT GGTTCGCTGA CGCAGACTTC 1121 GACTGCAACA TCGGGTGCCT GTTCGATGGG TGTTCTGCGG 1161 CTGACGAAGG AAGCAAGGAT GGTGTAGGTC TGGCAGATTT 1201 CAGTCTGTTT GAGGCAGGTG ATGTCCAGCT GAAGGATGTT 1241 CTTTCGGATA TGGAAGAGGG GATACAACCT CCAGCGATGA 1281 TCAGTGTGTG CAACTAATTC TGGAACCCGA GGAGGTTTTC 1321 GCTTTCCAGG TGTCCTGTCT TGGGTAATCC TTGATCTGTC 1361 TAATGCCACA GTGCCACTGC ACCAGAGCAG CTGAGAACTT 1401 TCTTGTAGAA AGCCCATGGC AGTTTGGCGT TAGACAAGTG 1441 TGTCGATGTT CTTTAATTCT TTGAATTTGC CCCTAGGCTG 1481 CTTGGCTAAC GTTAAGGGTT TGTCATTGTC TCACTTAGCC 1521 TAGATTCAAC TAATCACATC CTGAATCTGA  1561 CAAAAAAAAA AAAAAA

Expression of an internally deleted Zea mays WRI1 protein or a Zea mays WRI1 protein with a mutation at four or more of amino acid positions 358, 360, 362, 363, 369, 370, 374, 378, 395, 395, 400, 407, 416, 418, and/or 419 can increase the content of triacylglycerol in plant tissues such as leaves and seeds. Hence, one aspect of the invention is a mutant WRI1 protein that includes a mutation (substitution, insertion, or deletion) in the following sequence (SEQ ID NO:15):

232  HPLFLAQLQ 241 QEPQVVPALN QEPQPDQ S E T  G T T EQEPE SS  EAK T PDG S AE 281 PDENAVPDD T  AEPL ST VDD S  IEEGLW S PCM DYELD T M S R

For example, expression of an internally deleted Zea mays WRI1 protein or a Zea mays WRI1 protein with a mutation at four or more of the following positions 358, 360, 362, 363, 369, 370, 374, 378, 395, 395, 400, 407, 416, 418, and/or 419 can increase the content of triacylglycerol in plant tissues. Hence, another aspect of the invention is a mutant WRI1 protein that includes a mutation (substitution, insertion, or deletion) in the following sequence (SEQ ID NO: 16):

232  HPLFLAQLQ 241 QEPQVVPALN QEPQPDQXEX GXXEQEPEXX EAKXPDGXAE 281 PDENAVPDDX AEPLXXVDDX IEEGLWXPCM DYELDXMXR where at least four of the X residues in the SEQ ID NO:16 sequence is a substitution, insertion, or deletion compared to the wild type sequence (SEQ ID NO:15). The X residues are not acidic amino acids such as aspartic acid or glutamic acid. However, the X residue can be a small amino acid or a hydrophobic amino acid. For example, the X residues can each separately be alanine, glycine, valine, leucine, isoleucine, methionine, or any mixture thereof.

Another aspect of the invention is a mutant WRI1 protein with a deletion within the SEQ ID NO:15 portion of the WRI1 protein of at least 3, or at least 4, or at least 5, or at least 6, or at least 7, or at least 8, or at least 10, or at least 13, or at least 15, or at least 17, or at least 20, or at least 25, or at least 30, or at least 35, or at least 40, or at least 45 amino acids. Such mutant WRI1 proteins can be expressed in plant tissues to increase the oil/fatty acid/TAG content of those tissues.

Another example of an amino acid sequence for a WRINKLED1 (WRI1) sequence from Zea mays is available as accession number NP_001131733.1 (GI:212721372), and reproduced below as SEQ ID NO:17.

  1 MTMERSQPQH QQSPPSPSSS SSCVSADTVL VPPGKRRRRA  41 ATAKANKRAR KDPSDPPPAA GKRSSVYRGV TRHRWTGRFE  81 AHLWDKHCLA ALHNKKKGRQ VYLGAYDGEE AAARAYDLAA 121 LKYWGPEALL NFPVEDYSSE MPEMEAASRE EYLASLRRRS 161 SGFSRGVSKY RGVARHHHNG RWEARIGRVL GNKYLYLGTF 201 DTQEEAAKAY DLAAIEYRGA NAVTNFDISC YLDHPLFLAQ 241 LQQEQPQVVP ALDQEPQADQ REPETTAQEP VSSQAKTPAD 281 DNAEPDDIAE PLITVDNSVE ESLWSPCMDY ELDTMSRSNF 321 GSSINLSEWF TDADFDSDLG CLFDGRSAVD GGSKGGVGVA 361 DFSLFEAGDG QLKDVLSDME EGIQPPTIIS VCN A nucleic acid sequence for the above Zea mays WRI1 protein sequence is available as accession number NM_001138261.1 (GI:212721371), and is reproduced below as SEQ ID NO:18.

   1 CGTTCATGCA TGACCATGGA GAGATCTCAA CCGCAGCACC   41 AGCAGTCTCC TCCGTCGCCG TCGTCCTCCT CGTCCTGCGT   81 CTCCGCGGAC ACCGTCCTCG TCCCTCCGGG AAAGAGGCGG  121 CGGAGGGCGG CGACAGCCAA GGCCAATAAG AGGGCCCGCA  161 AGGACCCCTC TGATCCTCCT CCCGCCGCCG GGAAGAGGAG  201 CTCCGTATAC AGAGGAGTCA CCAGGCACAG GTGGACGGGC  241 AGGTTCGAGG CGCATCTCTG GGACAAGCAC TGCCTCGCCG  281 CGCTCCACAA CAAGAAGAAA GGCAGGCAAG TCTATCTGGG  321 GGCGTACGAC GGCGAGGAGG CAGCGGCTCG TGCCTATGAC  361 CTTGCAGCTC TCAAGTACTG GGGTCCTGAG GCTCTGCTCA  401 ACTTCCCTGT GGAGGATTAC TCCAGCGAGA TGCCGGAGAT  441 GGAGGCAGCG TCCCGGGAGG AGTACCTGGC CTCCCTCCGC  481 CGCAGGAGCA GCGGCTTCTC CAGGGGGGTC TCCAAGTACA  521 GAGGCGTCGC CAGGCATCAC CACAACGGGA GATGGGAGGC  561 ACGGATCGGG CGAGTTTTAG GGAACAAGTA CCTCTACTTG  601 GGAACATTCG ACACTCAAGA AGAGGCAGCC AAGGCCTATG  641 ATCTTGCGGC CATCGAATAC CGAGGTGCCA ATGCTGTAAC  681 CAACTTCGAC ATCAGCTGCT ACCTGGACCA CCCACTGTTC  721 CTGGCGCAGC TCCAGCAGGA GCAGCCACAG GTGGTGCCAG  761 CGCTCGACCA AGAACCTCAG GCTGATCAGA GAGAACCTGA  801 AACCACAGCC CAAGAGCCTG TGTCAAGCCA AGCCAAGACA  841 CCGGCGGATG ACAATGCAGA GCCTGATGAC ATCGCGGAGC  881 CCCTCATCAC GGTCGACAAC AGCGTCGAGG AGAGCTTATG  921 GAGTCCTTGC ATGGATTATG AGCTAGACAC CATGTCGAGA  961 TCTAACTTTG GCAGCTCGAT CAACCTGAGC GAGTGGTTCA 1001 CTGACGCAGA CTTCGACAGC GACTTGGGAT GCCTGTTCGA 1041 CGGGCGCTCT GCAGTTGATG GAGGAAGCAA GGGTGGCGTA 1081 GGTGTGGCGG ATTTCAGTTT GTTTGAAGCA GGTGATGGTC 1121 AGCTGAAGGA TGTTCTTTCG GATATGGAAG AGGGGATACA 1161 ACCTCCAACG ATAATCAGTG TGTGCAATTG ATTCTGAGAC 1201 CTATGCGTGG CGTGCGACAA GTGTCCTGTC TTTGGGTATA 1241 CTTGGTTTGT CCAATGCCAC GGTGCCACTG CTGCGAGTCA 1281 GCTGAACTTC TTGTAGAAAG CACATGGCAG CTTGGCATTA 1321 GACAAGTGTG TTGGTGTTCC TTAATTCTTT GGATATGCTT 1361 TAGGCATTGA CTAACCTTAA GGGTTCGTCA CTGTCTCGCT 1401 TAGCTTAGAT TAGACTAATC ACATCCTTGA ATCTGAAGTA 1441 GTTGTGCAGT ATCACAGTTT CACATGGCAA TTCTGCCAAT 1481 GCAGCATAGA TTTGTTCGTT TGAACAGCTG TAACTGTAAC 1521 CCTATAGCTC CAGATTAAGG AACAGTTTGT TTTTCATCCA 1561 T

Expression of an internally deleted Zea mays WRI1 protein or a Zea mays WRI1 protein with a mutation at four or more of positions 265, 266, 272, 273, 277, 294, 298, 302, 305, 314, and/or 316 can increase the content of triacylglycerol in plant tissues such as leaves and seeds. Hence, one aspect of the invention is a mutant WRI1 protein that includes a mutation (substitution, insertion, or deletion) in the following sequence (SEQ ID NO:19):

261                       REPE TT AQEP V SS QAK T PAD 281  DNAEPDDIAE PLI T VDN S VE E S LW S PCMDY ELD T M S R

For example, expression of an internally deleted Zea mays WRI1 protein or a Zea mays WRI1 protein with a mutation at four or more of positions 265, 266, 272, 273, 277, 294, 298, 302, 305, 314, and/or 316 can increase the content of triacylglycerol in plant tissues. Hence, another aspect of the invention is a mutant WRI1 protein that includes the following sequence (SEQ ID NO: 20):

261                       REPEXXAQEP VXXQAKXPAD 281 DNAEPDDIAE PLIXVDNXVE EXLWXPCMDY ELDXMXR where at least four of the X residues in the SEQ ID NO:20 sequence is a substitution, insertion, or deletion compared to the wild type sequence (SEQ ID NO:19). The X residues are not acidic amino acids such as aspartic acid or glutamic acid. However, the X residue can be a small amino acid or a hydrophobic amino acid. For example, the X residues can each separately be alanine, glycine, valine, leucine, isoleucine, methionine, or any mixture thereof.

Another aspect of the invention is a mutant WRI1 protein with a deletion within the SEQ ID NO:19 portion of the WRI1 protein of at least 3, or at least 4, or at least 5, or at least 6, or at least 7, or at least 8, or at least 10, or at least 13, or at least 15, or at least 17, or at least 20, or at least 25, or at least 30, or at least 35, or at least 40, or at least 45 amino acids. Such mutant WRI1 proteins can be expressed in plant tissues to increase the oil/fatty acid/TAG content of those tissues.

An example of an amino acid sequence for a WRINKLED1 (WRI1) sequence from Elaeis guineensis (palm oil) is available as accession number XP_010922928.1 (GI:743789536), and reproduced below as SEQ ID NO:21.

  1 MTLMKNSPPS TPLPPISPSS SASPSSYAPL SSPNMIPLNK  41 CKKSKPKHKK AKNSDESSRR RSSIYRGVTR HRGTGRYEAH  81 LWDKHWQHPV QNKKGRQVYL GAFTDELDAA RAHDLAALKL 121 WGPETILNFP VEMYREEYKE MQTMSKEEVL ASVRRRSNGF 161 ARGTSKYRGV ARHHKNGRWE ARLSQDVGCK YIYLGTYATQ 201 EEAAQAYDLA ALVHKGPNIV TNFASSVYKH RLQPFMQLLV 241 KPETEPAQED LGVLQMEATE TIDQTMPNYD LPEISWTFDI 281 DHDLGAYPLL DVPIEDDQHD ILNDLNFEGN IEHLFEEFET 321 FGGNESGSDG FSASKGA A nucleic acid sequence for the above Elaeis guineensis WRI1 protein sequence is available as accession number XM_010924626.1 (GI:743789535), and is reproduced below as SEQ ID NO:22.

   1 AGAGAGAGAG AGATTCCAAC ACAGGGCAGC TGAGATTGAG   41 CACAAGGCGC CGTGGAAACC ACGAGTTCCA TTGGCAACAT   81 GGGAAACCTG GTGGCCAAGT GTAGAGCTCT CTCACACAAA  121 CCCATGCGGC CAACTTGCAG ACCCTCGAGT CATTTGGACT  161 CTTCCAAGCT CACCAGCCGT AGGGTTTTTT GACAAGAGGG  201 ACCTCCAGTA AACGTTAAAC AAACTCGCAG CTCCCACCTT  241 TGGATCCATT CCATCGCTTC AACGGTGGGT TAGAAGCCTC  281 CGCGCCAAAT GCACGAGTGC TCAACAGCAC GCTCCCCTAA  321 TTTTTCTCTC TCCACCTCCT CACTTCTCTA TATATAATCC  361 TCTCTTTGGT GAACCACCAT CAACCAAACC AACGGTATAG  401 TATACGTAGG AAATAATCCC TTTCTAGAAC ATGACTCTCA  441 TGAAGAAATC TCCTCCCTCT ACTCCTCTCC CACCAATATC  481 GCCTTCCTCT TCCGCTTCAC CATCCAGCTA TGCACCCCTT  521 TCTTCTCCTA ATATGATCCC TCTTAACAAG TGCAAGAAGT  561 CGAAGCCAAA ACATAAGAAA GCTAAGAACT CAGATGAAAG  601 CAGTAGGAGA AGAAGCTCTA TCTACAGAGG AGTCACGAGG  641 CACCGAGGGA CTGGGAGATA TGAAGCTCAC CTGTGGGACA  681 AGCACTGGCA GCATCCGGTC CAGAACAAGA AAGGCAGGCA  721 AGTTTACTTG GGAGCCTTTA CTGATGAGTT GGACGCAGCA  761 CGAGCTCATG ACTTGGCTGC CCTTAAGCTC TGGGGTCCAG  801 AGACAATTTT AAACTTCCCT GTGGAAATGT ATAGAGAAGA  841 GTACAAGGAG ATGCAAACCA TGTCAAAGGA AGAGGTGCTG  881 GCTTCGGTTA GGCGCAGGAG CAACGGCTTT GCCAGGGGTA  921 CCTCTAAGTA CCGTGGGGTG GCCAGGCATC ACAAAAACGG  961 CCGGTGGGAG GCCAGGCTTA GCCAGGACGT TGGCTGCAAG 1001 TACATCTACT TGGGAACATA CGCAACTCAA GAGGAGGCTG 1041 CCCAAGCTTA TGATTTAGCT GCTCTAGTAC ACAAAGGGCC 1081 AAATATAGTG ACCAACTTTG CTAGCAGTGT CTATAAGCAT 1121 CGCCTACAGC CATTCATGCA GCTATTAGTG AAGCCTGAGA 1161 CGGAGCCAGC ACAAGAAGAC CTGGGGGTTA TGCAAATGGA 1201 AGCAACCGAG ACAATCGATC AGACCATGCC AAATTACGAC 1241 CTGCCGGAGA TCTCATGGAC CTTCGACATA GACCATGACT 1281 TAGGTGCATA TCCTCTCCTT GATGTCCCAA TTGAGGATGA 1321 TCAACATGAC ATCTTGAATG ATCTCAATTT CGAGGGGAAC 1361 ATTGAGCACC TCTTTGAAGA GTTTGAGACC TTCGGAGGCA 1401 ATGAGAGTGG AAGTGATGGT TTCAGTGCAA GCAAAGGTGC 1441 CTAGCAGAGG AAAGTGGTTT GAAGATGGAG GACATGGCAT 1481 CTAAAGCGAA CTGAGCCTCC TGGCCTCTTC AAAGTAGTGT 1521 CTGCTTTTTA GAAATCTTGG TGGGTCGATT TGAGTTAGGA 1561 GCCCGATACT TCTATCAGGG GATATGTTTA GCTACAATTC 1601 TAGTTTTTTT TTCTTTTTTT TTTTTCAGCC GGAAGTCTGG 1641 TACTTCTGTT GAATATTATG ATGTGCTTCT TGCTTAGTTG 1681 TTCCTGTTCT TCTCCCTTTT AGAGTTCAGC ATATTTATGT 1721 TTTGATGTAA TGGGGAATGT TGGCAGACAG CTTGATATAT 1761 GGTTATTTCA TTCTCCATTA AA

Expression of an internally deleted Elaeis guineensis WRI1 protein or an Elaeis guineensis WRI1 protein with a mutation at four or more of the following positions 244, 259, 261, 265, 275, and/or 277 can increase the content of triacylglycerol in plant tissues such as leaves and seeds. Hence, one aspect of the invention is a mutant WRI1 protein that includes a mutation (e.g., a substitution, insertion, or deletion) in the following sequence (SEQ ID NO:23):

241 KPE T EPAQED LGVLQMEA T E  T IDQ T MPNYD LPEI S W T FDI DH

For example, expression of an internally deleted Elaeis guineensis WRI1 protein or an Elaeis guineensis WRI1 protein with a mutation at four or more of positions 244, 259, 261, 265, 275, and/or 277 can increase the content of triacylglycerol in plant tissues. Hence, another aspect of the invention is a mutant WRI1 protein that includes the following sequence (SEQ ID NO: 24):

241 KPEXEPAQED LGVLQMEAXE XIDQXMPNYD LPEIXWXFDI DH where at least four of the X residues in the SEQ ID NO:24 sequence is a substitution, insertion, or deletion compared to the wild type sequence (SEQ ID NO:23). The X residues are not acidic amino acids such as aspartic acid or glutamic acid. However, the X residue can be a small amino acid or a hydrophobic amino acid. For example, the X residues can each separately be alanine, glycine, valine, leucine, isoleucine, methionine, and any mixture thereof.

Another aspect of the invention is a mutant WRI1 protein with a deletion within the SEQ ID NO:23 portion of the WRI1 protein of at least 3, or at least 4, or at least 5, or at least 6, or at least 7, or at least 8, or at least 10, or at least 13, or at least 15, or at least 17, or at least 20, or at least 25, or at least 30, or at least 35, or at least 40, or at least 45 amino acids. Such mutant WRI1 proteins can be expressed in plant tissues to increase the oil/fatty acid/TAG content of those tissues.

An example of an amino acid sequence for a WRINKLED1 (WRI1) sequence from Glycine max (soybean) is available as accession number XP_006596987.1 (GI:571513961), and reproduced below as SEQ ID NO:25.

  1 MKRSPASSCS SSTSSVGFEA PIEKRRPKHP RRNNLKSQKC  41 KQNQTTTGGR RSSIYRGVTR HRWTGRFEAH LWDKSSWNNI  81 QSKKGRQGAY DTEESAARTY DLAALKYWGK DATLNFPIET 121 YTKELEEMDK VSREEYLASL RRQSSGFSRG LSKYRGVARH 161 HHNGRWEARI GRVCGNKYLY LGTYKTQEEA AVAYDMAAIE 201 YRGVNAVTNF DISNYMDKIK KKNDQTQQQQ TEAQTETVPN 241 SSDSEEVEVE QQTTTITTPP PSENLHMPPQ QHQVQYTPHV 281 SPREEESSSL ITIMDHVLEQ DLPWSFMYTG LSQFQDPNLA 321 FCKGDDDLVG MFDSAGFEED IDFLFSTQPG DETESDVNNM 361 SAVLDSVECG DTNGAGGSMM HVDNKQKIVS FASSPSSTTT 401 VSCDYALDL A nucleic acid sequence for the above Glycine max WRI1 protein sequence is available as accession number XM_006596924.1 (GI:571513960), and is reproduced below as SEQ ID NO:26.

   1 AGTGTTGCTC AAATTCAAGC CACTTAATTA GCCATGGTTG   41 ATTGATCAAG TTAAATTCCA ACCCAAGGTT AAATCATTAC   81 TCCCTTCTCA TCCTTCCCAA CCCCAACCCC CAGAAATATT  121 ACAGATTCAA TTGCTTAATT AAATACTATT TTCCCCTCCT  161 TCTATAATAC CCTCCAAAAT CTTTTTCCTT CTTCATTCTC  201 CCTTTCTCTA TGTTTTGGCA AACCACTTTA GGTAACCAGA  241 TTACTACTAC TATTGCTTCA TATACAAAGA TGCTATCGTA  281 AAAAAGAGAG AAACTTGGGA AGTGGGAACA CATTCAAAAT  321 CCTTGTTTTT CTTTTTGGTC TAATTTTTCA TCTCAAAACA  361 CACACCCATT GAGTATTTTT CATTTTTTTG TTCTTTTGGG  401 ACAAAAAAGG TGGGTGTTGT TGGCATTATT GAAGATAGAG  441 GCCCCCAAAA TGAAGAGGTC TCCAGCATCT TCTTGTTCAT  481 CATCTACTTC CTCTGTTGGG TTTGAAGCTC CCATTGAAAA  521 AAGAAGGCCT AAGCATCCAA GGAGGAATAA TTTGAAGTCA  561 CAAAAATGCA AGCAGAACCA AACCACCACT GGTGGCAGAA  601 GAAGCTCTAT CTATAGAGGA GTTACAAGGC ATAGGTGGAC  641 AGGGAGGTTT GAAGCTCACC TATGGGATAA GAGCTCTTGG  681 AACAACATTC AGAGCAAGAA GGGTCGACAA GGGGCATATG  721 ATACTGAAGA ATCTGCAGCC CGTACCTATG ACCTTGCAGC  761 CCTTAAATAC TGGGGAAAAG ATGCAACCCT GAATTTCCCG  801 ATAGAAACTT ATACCAAGGA GCTCGAGGAA ATGGACAAGG  841 TTTCAAGAGA AGAATATTTG GCTTCTTTGC GGCGCCAAAG  881 CAGTGGCTTT TCTAGAGGCC TGTCTAAGTA CCGTGGGGTT  921 GCTAGGCATC ATCATAATGG TCGCTGGGAA GCACGAATTG  961 GAAGAGTATG CGGAAACAAG TACCTCTACT TGGGGACATA 1001 TAAAACTCAA GAGGAGGCAG CAGTGGCATA TGACATGGCA 1041 GCAATAGAGT ACCGTGGAGT CAATGCAGTG ACCAATTTTG 1081 ACATAAGCAA CTACATGGAC AAAATAAAGA AGAAAAATGA 1121 CCAAACCCAA CAACAACAAA CAGAAGCACA AACGGAAACA 1161 GTTCCTAACT CCTCTGACTC TGAAGAAGTA GAAGTAGAAC 1201 AACAGACAAC AACAATAACC ACACCACCCC CATCTGAAAA 1241 TCTGCACATG CCACCACAGC AGCACCAAGT TCAATACACC 1281 CCCCATGTCT CTCCAAGGGA AGAAGAATCA TCATCACTGA 1321 TCACAATTAT GGACCATGTG CTTGAGCAGG ATCTGCCATG 1361 GAGCTTCATG TACACTGGCT TGTCTCAGTT TCAAGATCCA 1401 AACTTGGCTT TCTGCAAAGG TGATGATGAC TTGGTGGGCA 1441 TGTTTGATAG TGCAGGGTTT GAGGAAGACA TTGATTTTCT 1481 GTTCAGCACT CAACCTGGTG ATGAGACTGA GAGTGATGTC 1521 AACAATATGA GCGCAGTTTT GGATAGTGTT GAGTGTGGAG 1561 ACACAAATGG GGCTGGTGGA AGCATGATGC ATGTGGATAA 1601 CAAGCAGAAG ATAGTATCAT TTGCTTCTTC ACCATCATCT 1641 ACAACTACAG TTTCTTGTGA CTATGCTCTA GATCTATGAT 1681 CTCTTCAGAA GGGTGATGGA TGACCTACAT GGAATGGAAC 1721 CTTGTGTAGA TTATTATTGG GTTTGTTATG CATGTTGTTG 1761 GGGTTTGTTG TGATAGGTTG GTGGATGGGT GTGACTTGTG 1801 AAAATGTTCA TTGGTTTTAG GATTTTCCTT TCATCCATAC 1841 TCCGTTGTCG AAAGAAGAAA ATGTTCATTT TAGACTTGGA 1881 TTTTAGTATA AAAAAAAAGG AGAAAAAACC AAAAATGTGA 1921 TTTGGGTGCA AACAATGTTT TGTTTTTCTT TTTACTTTTG 1961 GGGTAAGGAG ATGAAGAGAG GGGAAATTTA AACCATTCCT 2001 ATTCTTGGGG GATAATGCAG TATAAATTAA GATCAGACTG 2041 TTTTTAGCAT ATGGAGTGCA AACTGCAAAG GCCAAGTTTC 2081 CTTTGTTTAA ACAATTTAGG CTTTCTTTTC CTTTGCCTAT 2121 TTTTTTTTTA TTTTTTTTTT TGTATTGGGG CATAGCAGTT 2161 AGTGTTGTGT TGAGATCTGA AATCTGATCT CTGGTTTGGT 2201 TTGTTC

Expression of an internally deleted Glycine max WRI1 protein or an Glycine max WRI1 protein with a mutation at four or more of the following positions 353, 355, 361, 366, 372, 378, 390, 393, 394, 396, 397, 398, 399, 400 and/or 402 can increase the content of triacylglycerol in plant tissues such as leaves and seeds. Hence, one aspect of the invention is a mutant WRI1 protein that includes a mutation (e.g., a substitution, insertion, or deletion) in the following sequence (SEQ ID NO:27):

351                                  DE T E S DVNNM 361 S AVLD S VECG D T NGAGG S MM HVDNKQKIV S  FA SS T SSTTT 401 V S CDYTLDL

For example, expression of an internally deleted Glycine max WRI1 protein or a Glycine max WRI1 protein with a mutation at four or more of positions 353, 355, 361, 366, 372, 378, 390, 393, 394, 396, 397, 398, 399, 400 and/or 402 can increase the content of triacylglycerol in plant tissues. Hence, another aspect of the invention is a mutant WRI1 protein that includes the following sequence (SEQ ID NO: 28):

351                                  DEXEXDVNNM 361 XAVLDXVECG DXNGAGGXMM HVDNKQKIVX FAXXPXXXXX 401 VXCDYALDL where at least four of the X residues in the SEQ ID NO:28 sequence is a substitution, insertion, or deletion compared to the wild type sequence (SEQ ID NO:27). The X residues are not acidic amino acids such as aspartic acid or glutamic acid. However, the X residue can be a small amino acid or a hydrophobic amino acid. For example, the X residues can each separately be alanine, glycine, valine, leucine, isoleucine, methionine, and any mixture thereof.

Another aspect of the invention is a mutant WRI1 protein with a deletion within the SEQ ID NO:27 portion of the WRI1 protein of at least 3, or at least 4, or at least 5, or at least 6, or at least 7, or at least 8, or at least 10, or at least 13, or at least 15, or at least 17, or at least 20, or at least 25, or at least 30, or at least 35, or at least 40, or at least 45 amino acids. Such mutant WRI1 proteins can be expressed in plant tissues to increase the oil/fatty acid/TAG content of those tissues.

Sequences related to the WRINKLED1 sequences provided herein can also be used in the methods and plants provided herein. For example, the following protein sequences exhibit sequence identity to the Brassica napus WRINKLED amino acid sequence with SEQ ID NO:5.

Sequence Accession Description Identity ADO16346.1 WRINKLED1 1 [Brassica napus] 100%  ABD16282.1 AP2/EREBP transcription factor [Brassica 94% napus] >gb|ABD72476.1| AP2/EREBP transcriptional factor WRI1 [Brassica napus] AAT44955.1 putative AP2/EREBP transcription factor 93% [Arabidopsis thaliana] CAB81797.1 aintegumaenta-like protein [Arabidopsis 91% thaliana] XP_ hypothetical protein ARALYDRAFT_485830 82% 002876251.1 [Arabidopsis lyrata subsp. lyrata] >gb|EFH52510.1| hypothetical protein ARALYDRAFT_485830 [Arabidopsis lyrata subsp. lyrata] NP_ ethylene-responsive transcription factor WRI1 81% 001030857.1 [Arabidopsis thaliana] >sp|Q6X5Y6.1|WRI1_ARATH RecName: Full = Ethylene-responsive transcription factor WRI1; AltName: Full = Protein ACTIVATOR OF SPORAMIN::LUC 1; AltName: Full = Protein WRINKLED1 1 >gb|AAP80382.1|WRINKLED1 [Arabidopsis thaliana] >gb|AAX11223.1| activator of sporamin LUC 1 [Arabidopsis thaliana] >gb|AEE79215.1| ethylene-responsive transcription factor WRI1 [Arabidopsis thaliana] NP_191000.3 ethylene-responsive transcription factor WRI1 81% [Arabidopsis thaliana] >gb|AEE79213.1| ethylene-responsive transcription factor WRI1 [Arabidopsis thaliana] XP_ hypothetical protein SELMODRAFT_85823 80% 002966660.1 [Selaginella moellendorffii] >gb|EFJ32687.1| hypothetical protein SELMODRAFT_85823 [Selaginella moellendorffii] XP_ conserved hypothetical protein [Ricinus 80% 002528384.1 communis] >gb|EEF33977.1| conserved hypothetical protein [Ricinus communis] NP_ Os08g0442400 [Oryza sativa Japonica Group] 78% 001061917.1 >dbj|BAF23831.1| Os08g0442400 [Oryza sativa Japonica Group] >dbj|BAG97826.1| unnamed protein product [Oryza sativa Japonica Group] >gb|ADX60232.1| AP2- EREBP transcription factor [Oryza sativa Japonica Group] EEC83647.1 hypothetical protein OsI_29392 [Oryza sativa 78% Indica Group] NP_974430.1 ethylene-responsive transcription factor WRI1 78% [Arabidopsis thaliana] >gb|AEE79214.1| ethylene-responsive transcription factor WRI1 [Arabidopsis thaliana] XP_ PREDICTED: ethylene-responsive 78% 003530370.1 transcription factor WRI1-like [Glycine max] XP_ hypothetical protein SELMODRAFT_129793 78% 002989385.1 [Selaginella moellendorffii] >gb|EFJ09476.1| hypothetical protein SELMODRAFT_129793 [Selaginella moellendorffii] XP_ PREDICTED: AP2-like ethylene-responsive 77% 003561189.1 transcription factor ANT-like [Brachypodium distachyon] ABL85061.1 hypothetical protein 57h21.37 [Brachypodium 77% sylvaticum] XP_ AP2 domain-containing transcription factor 77% 002323836.1 [Populus trichocarpa] >gb|EEF03969.1| AP2 domain-containing transcription factor [Populus trichocarpa] XP_ hypothetical protein 77% 002437819.1 SORBIDRAFT_10g003160 [Sorghum bicolor] >gb|EER89186.1| hypothetical protein SORBIDRAFT_10g003160 [Sorghum bicolor] EAZ35820.1 hypothetical protein OsJ_20113 [Oryza sativa 77% Japonica Group] BAD68417.1 AP2 DNA-binding domain protein-like [Oryza 77% sativa Japonica Group] >dbj|BAD68772.1| AP2 DNA-binding domain protein-like [Oryza sativa Japonica Group] EAY99657.1 hypothetical protein OsI_21635 [Oryza sativa 77% Indica Group] XP_ conserved hypothetical protein [Ricinus 77% 002517474.1 communis] >gb|EEF45016.1| conserved hypothetical protein [Ricinus communis] XP_ PREDICTED: uncharacterized protein 77% 003567050.1 LOC100825100 [Brachypodium distachyon] BAD10030.1 AP2/EREBP transcription factor-like protein 77% [Oryza sativa Japonica Group] XP_ PREDICTED: AP2-like ethylene-responsive 76% 003525949.1 transcription factor At1g16060-like [Glycine max] CBI36586.3 unnamed protein product [Vitis vinifera] 76% NP_ AP2-like ethylene-responsive transcription 76% 001077849.1 factor [Arabidopsis thaliana] >gb|AEE36289.1| AP2-like ethylene-responsive transcription factor [Arabidopsis thaliana] CBI25261.3 unnamed protein product [Vitis vinifera] 76% XP_ hypothetical protein ARALYDRAFT_477146 76% 002889265.1 [Arabidopsis lyrata subsp. lyrata] >gb|EFH65524.1| hypothetical protein ARALYDRAFT_477146 [Arabidopsis lyrata subsp . lyrata] XP_ hypothetical protein 76% 002441444.1 SORBIDRAFT_09g026800 [Sorghum bicolor] >gb|EES19874.1| hypothetical protein SORBIDRAFT_09g026800 [Sorghum bicolor] XP_ predicted protein [Physcomitrella patens subsp. 76% 001779615.1 patens] >gb|EDQ55609.1| predicted protein [Physcomitrella patens subsp. patens] XP_ hypothetical protein 75% 002460236.1 SORBIDRAFT_02g025080 [Sorghum bicolor] >gb|PER96757.1| hypothetical protein SORBIDRAFT_02g025080 [Sorghum bicolor] XP_ PREDICTED: ethylene-responsive 75% 003533548.1 transcription factor WRI1-like [Glycine max] XP_ PREDICTED: AP2-like ethylene-responsive 75% 002272159.1 transcription factor At1g16060-like [Vitis vinifera] XP_ AP2 domain-containing transcription factor 75% 002297679.1 [Populus trichocarpa] >gb|EEE82484.1| AP2 domain-containing transcription factor [Populus trichocarpa] XP_ PREDICTED: AP2-like ethylene-responsive 75% 003578142.1 transcription factor At1g16060-like [Brachypodium distachyon] XP_ PREDICTED: AP2-like ethylene-responsive 75% 002273046.2 transcription factor At1g16060 [Vitis vinifera] XP_ PREDICTED: AP2-like ethylene-responsive 75% 003553203.1 transcription factor ANT-like [Glycine max] XP_ PREDICTED: AP2-like ethylene-responsive 75% 003530686.1 transcription factor At1g16060-like [Glycine max] XP_ AP2 domain-containing transcription factor 74% 002325111.1 [Populus trichocarpa] >gb|EEF03676.1| AP2 domain-containing transcription factor [Populus trichocarpa] XP_ AP2 domain-containing transcription factor 74% 002315794.1 [Populus trichocarpa] >gb|EEF01965.1| AP2 domain-containing transcription factor [Populus trichocarpa] NP_ Os09g0423800 [Oryza sativa Japonica Group] 74% 001063215.1 >dbj|BAF25129.1| Os09g0423800 [Oryza sativa Japonica Group] EAZ09147.1 hypothetical protein OsI_31417 [Oryza sativa 74% Indica Group] NP_ uncharacterized protein LOC100279914 [Zea 74% 001146338.1 mays] >gb|ACL53718.1| unknown [Zea mays] ACF84637.1 unknown [Zea mays] 74% EEE69730.1 hypothetical protein OsJ_29415 [Oryza sativa 74% Japonica Group] XP_ PREDICTED: AP2-like ethylene-responsive 74% 003524030.1 transcription factor At1g16060-like [Glycine max] CBI22161.3 unnamed protein product [Vitis vinifera] 74% XP_ AP2 domain-containing transcription factor 74% 002303866.1 [Populus trichocarpa] >gb|EEE78845.1| AP2 domain-containing transcription factor [Populus trichocarpa] XP_ PREDICTED: AP2-like ethylene-responsive 73% 003519167.1 transcription factor At1g16060-like [Glycine max] XP_ PREDICTED: AP2-like ethylene-responsive 73% 003550676.1 transcription factor At1g16060-like [Glycine max] AAW78366.1 transcription factor AP2D4 [Oryza sativa 72% Japonica Group] EEC79593.1 hypothetical protein OsI_20775 [Oryza sativa 72% Indica Group] XP_ AP2 domain-containing transcription factor 72% 003610261.1 [Medicago truncatula] >gb|AES92458.1| AP2 domain-containing transcription factor [Medicago truncatula] AAW78369.1 transcription factor AP2D14 [Oryza sativa 71% Japonica Group] CAE00853.1 AP2-1 protein [Oryza sativa Japonica Group] 70% BAJ33872.1 unnamed protein product [Thellungiella 70% halophila]

Additional related WRINKLED1 sequences can also be targeted or employed in the methods, seeds, plant cells, and plants described herein, including those with about at least 40% sequence identity, or at least 50% sequence identity, or at least 60% sequence identity, or at least 70% sequence identity, or 60-99% sequence identity, or 70-99% sequence identity, or 80-99% sequence identity, or 90-95% sequence identity, or 90-99% sequence identity, or 95-97% sequence identity, or 97-99% sequence identity, or 100% sequence identity (or complementarity) with any of SEQ ID NOs:1-31, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, and/or 64. In some cases, the transcription factor nucleic acid and amino acid sequences are not identical to a wild type sequence. Instead the transcription factor nucleic acid and amino acid sequences have at least one, or at least two, or at least three, or at least four nucleotide or amino acid substitutions, deletions, or insertions compared to the corresponding wild type transcription factor nucleic acid or amino acid sequence.

Related WRINKLED1 sequences can be isolated from a variety of plant types such as alfalfa (e.g., forage legume alfalfa), algae, avocado, barley, broccoli, Brussels sprouts, cabbage, canola, cassava, cauliflower, cole vegetables, collards, crucifers, grain legumes, grasses (e.g., forage grasses), jatropa, kale, kohlrabi, maize, miscanthus, mustards, nut sedge, oats, oil firewood trees, oilseeds, potato, radish, rice, rutabaga, sorghum, sugar beets, sugarcane, sunflower, switchgrass, tobacco, tomato, turnips, and wheat. In some embodiments, the plant is a Brassicaceae or other Solanaceae species. In some embodiments, the plant is not a species of Arabidopsis, for example, in some embodiments, the plant is not Arabidopsis thaliana.

As described herein, nucleic acids encoding a WRINKLED1 transcription factor with a mutant PEST domain are useful for expressing such proteins in plants. Such mutant PEST domains can include any with at least at least 50% sequence identity, or at least 60% sequence identity, or at least 70% sequence identity, or 60-99% sequence identity, or 70-99% sequence identity, or 80-99% sequence identity, or 90-95% sequence identity, or 90-99% sequence identity, or 95-97% sequence identity, or 97-99% sequence identity, or 100% sequence identity to any of SEQ ID NO:3, 4, 7, 8, 11, 12, 15, 16, 19, 20, 23, 24, 27, 28, 59, 61, and/or 63 so long as those PEST domains have at least 1 amino acid substitution, deletion, or insertion compared to its corresponding wild type PEST amino acid sequence.

Nucleic acids with at least 50% sequence identity to those described herein can readily be identified, isolated and used to facilitate production of increased oil content in plants. Such nucleic acids can encode or hybridize to WRINKLED1 nucleic acids, or fragments thereof. These related nucleic acids can be used to increase the expression of WRINKLED1 in plants.

For example, related nucleic acids can be isolated and identified by mutation of the SEQ ID NO:2, SEQ ID NO:6, SEQ ID NO:10, SEQ ID NO:14, SEQ ID NO:18, SEQ ID NO:22, and/or SEQ ID NO:26 cDNA sequences and/or by hybridization to DNA and/or RNA isolated from other plant species using the SEQ ID NO:2, SEQ ID NO:6, SEQ ID NO:10, SEQ ID NO:14, SEQ ID NO:18, SEQ ID NO:22, and/or SEQ ID NO:26 nucleic acids as probes. Sequences of the WRINKLED1 transcription factors (e.g., SEQ ID NO:1, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21, 25, 29, 30, 31, 62, and/or 64) can also be examined and used a basis for designing alternative WRINKLED1 proteins and nucleic acids.

In some embodiments, the WRINKLED1 nucleic acids described herein include any nucleic acid that can selectively hybridize to a nucleic acid with any of the SEQ ID NO:2, SEQ ID NO:6, SEQ ID NO:10, SEQ ID NO:14, SEQ ID NO:18, SEQ ID NO:22, and/or SEQ ID NO:26 cDNA sequences.

Alternatively, the WRINKLED1 nucleic acids (e.g., SEQ ID NO:2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22, and/or 26) can be examined and used a basis for designing additional WRINKLED1 nucleic acids (e.g., having optimized codons or selected mutant WRI1 transcription factors) that function as stabilized transcription factors in selected plant species.

The term “selectively hybridize” includes hybridization, under stringent hybridization conditions, of a nucleic acid sequence to a specified nucleic acid target sequence (e.g., SEQ ID NO:2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22, and/or 26) to a detectably greater degree (e.g., at least 2-fold over background) than its hybridization to non-target nucleic acid sequences. Such selective hybridization substantially excludes non-target nucleic acids.

Related WRINKLED1 nucleic acids sequences typically have about at least 40% sequence identity, or at least 50% sequence identity, or at least 60% sequence identity, or at least 70% sequence identity, or at least 80% sequence identity, or at least 85% sequence identity, or at least 90% sequence identity, or at least 95% sequence identity, or at least 97% sequence identity, or 60-99% sequence identity, or 70-99% sequence identity, or 80-99% sequence identity, or 90-95% sequence identity, or 90-99% sequence identity, or 95-97% sequence identity, or 97-99% sequence identity, or 100% sequence identity (or complementarity) with any of SEQ ID NO:2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22, and/or 26. In some embodiments, a selectively hybridizing sequence has about at least about 80% sequence identity or complementarity with any of SEQ ID NO:2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22, and/or 26. The WRINKLED1 nucleic acids employed in the expression vectors, transgenes, plants, plant cells, plant seeds and methods described herein can also have less than 100%, or less than 99.5%, or less than 99% sequence identity (or complementarity) with any of SEQ ID NO:2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22, and/or 26. In other words, the WRINKLED1 nucleic acids employed in the expression vectors, transgenes, plants, plant cells, plant seeds and methods described herein can also not include a wild type sequence.

In some embodiments, the nucleic acids used in the methods and plants provided herein can include fragments of WRINKLED1 nucleic acids. For example, the nucleic acids of the invention include those with about 500 of the same nucleotides as any of the SEQ ID NO:2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22, and/or 26 sequences, or about 700 of the same nucleotides as any of the SEQ ID NO:2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22, and/or 26 sequences, or about 900 of the same nucleotides as any of the SEQ ID NO:2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22, and/or 26 sequences, or about 1000 of the same nucleotides as any of the SEQ ID NO:2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22, and/or 26 sequences, or about 1200 of the same nucleotides as any of the SEQ ID NO:2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22, and/or 26 sequences, or about 1250 of the same nucleotides as any of the SEQ ID NO:2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22, and/or 26 sequences, or about 1300 of the same nucleotides as any of the SEQ ID NO:2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22, and/or 26 sequences. The identical nucleotides can be distributed throughout the nucleic acid, and need not be contiguous but are present in homologous positions.

For example, the nucleic acid sequence of a WRINKLED1 nucleic acid can be optimized for expression in a particular plant species by altering selected codons to encode the same amino acid but use nucleotide codons that are more easily ‘read’ by the transcription/translation machinery of a selected plant species.

Note that if a value of a variable that is necessarily an integer (e.g., the number of nucleotides or amino acids in a nucleic acid or protein), is described as a range, such as 80-99% sequence identity, what is meant is that the value can be any integer between 80 and 99 inclusive, i.e., 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98 or 99, or any range between 80 and 99 inclusive, e.g., 81-99%, 81-98%, 82-99%, etc. Moreover, if a specifically recited percent sequence identity indicates that a partial nucleotide or amino acid is present (in a nucleic acid or polypeptide) the percent sequence identity is rounded up or down so that a complete nucleotide or amino acid is present.

In some embodiments, a related nucleic acid hybridizes to at least one of the nucleic acids described herein under “stringent conditions” or “stringent hybridization conditions.” The terms “stringent conditions” or “stringent hybridization conditions” include conditions under which a probe will hybridize to its target sequence to a detectably greater degree than other sequences (e.g., at least 2-fold over background). Stringent conditions are somewhat sequence-dependent and can vary in different circumstances. By controlling the stringency of the hybridization and/or washing conditions, target sequences can be hybridized that have up to 100% complementarity to the probe (homologous probing). Alternatively, stringency conditions can be adjusted to allow some mismatching in sequences so that lower degrees of sequence similarity are detected (heterologous probing).

A probe for identifying and/or isolating a related nucleic acid can be approximately 15-500 nucleotides in length, but can vary greatly in length from about 17 nucleotides to equal to the entire length of the target sequence. In some embodiments, the probe is about 10-50 nucleotides in length, or about 15-50 nucleotides in length, or about 16-45 nucleotides in length, or about 18-25 nucleotides in length.

Typically, stringent conditions will be those where the salt concentration is less than about 1.5 M Na ion (or other salts), typically about 0.01 to 1.0 M Na ion concentration (or other salts), at pH 7.0 to 8.3 and the temperature is at least about 30° C. for shorter probes (e.g., 10 to 50 nucleotides) and at least about 60° C. for longer probes (e.g., greater than 50 nucleotides). Stringent conditions may also be achieved with the addition of destabilizing agents such as formamide or Denhardt's solution. Exemplary low stringency conditions include hybridization with a buffer solution of 30 to 35% formamide, 1M NaCl, 1% SDS (sodium dodecyl sulfate) at 37° C., and a wash in 1×SSC to 2×SSC (where 20×SSC is 3.0 M NaCl, 0.3 M trisodium citrate) at 50 to 55° C. Exemplary moderate stringency conditions include hybridization in 40 to 45% formamide, 1M NaCl, 1% SDS at 37° C., and a wash in 0.5×SSC to 1×SSC at 55 to 60° C. Exemplary high stringency conditions include hybridization in 50% formamide, 1M NaCl, 1% SDS at 37° C., and a wash in 0.1×SSC at 60 to 65° C. Specificity is typically a function of post-hybridization washes, where the factors controlling hybridization include the ionic strength and temperature of the final wash solution. Hence, high stringency conditions include can be achieved simply by employing a wash in 0.1×SSC at 60 to 65° C.

For DNA-DNA hybrids, the T_(m) can be approximated from the equation of Meinkoth and Wahl (Anal. Biochem. 138:267-84 (1984)): T _(m)=81.5° C.+16.6(log M)+0.41(% GC)−0.61(% formamide)−500/L where M is the molarity of monovalent cations; % GC is the percentage of guanosine and cytosine nucleotides in the DNA, % formamide is the percentage of formamide in the hybridization solution, and L is the length of the hybrid in base pairs. The T_(m) is the temperature (under defined ionic strength and pH) at which 50% of a complementary target sequence hybridizes to a perfectly matched probe. The T_(m) is reduced by about 1° C. for each 1% of mismatching. Thus, the T_(m), hybridization and/or wash conditions can be adjusted to hybridize to sequences of the desired sequence identity. For example, if sequences with greater than or equal to 90% sequence identity are sought, the T_(m) can be decreased 10° C. Generally, stringent conditions are selected to be about 5° C. lower than the thermal melting point (T_(m)) for the specific sequence and its complement at a defined ionic strength and pH. However, severely stringent conditions can include hybridization and/or a wash at 1, 2, 3 or 4° C. lower than the thermal melting point (T_(m)). Moderately stringent conditions can include hybridization and/or a wash at 6, 7, 8, 9 or 10° C. lower than the thermal melting point (T_(m)). Low stringency conditions can include hybridization and/or a wash at 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 or 20° C. lower than the thermal melting point (T_(m)). Using the equation, hybridization and wash compositions, and a desired T_(m), those of ordinary skill can identify and isolate nucleic acids with sequences related to any of the SEQ ID NO:2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22, and 26 sequences.

Those of skill in the art also understand how to vary the hybridization and/or wash solutions to isolate desirable nucleic acids. For example, if the desired degree of mismatching results in a T_(m) of less than 45° C. (aqueous solution) or 32° C. (formamide solution) it is preferred to increase the SSC concentration so that a higher temperature can be used.

An extensive guide to the hybridization of nucleic acids is found in Tijssen, LABORATORY TECHNIQUES IN BIOCHEMISTRY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY—HYBRIDIZATION WITH NUCLEIC ACID PROBES, part 1, chapter 2, “Overview of principles of hybridization and the strategy of nucleic acid probe assays,” Elsevier, N.Y. (1993); and in CURRENT PROTOCOLS IN MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, chapter 2, Ausubel, et al., eds, Greene Publishing and Wiley-Interscience, New York (1995).

Unless otherwise stated, in the present application, high stringency is defined as a wash in 0.1×SSC, 0.1% SDS at 65° C. High stringency hybridization can include hybridization in 4×SSC, 5×Denhardt's (5 g Ficoll, 5 g polyvinylpyrrolidone, 5 g bovine serum albumin in 500 ml of water), 0.1 mg/ml boiled salmon sperm DNA, and 25 mM Na phosphate at 65° C., followed by a wash in 0.1×SSC, 0.1% SDS at 65° C.

The following terms are used to describe the sequence relationships between two or more nucleic acids or nucleic acids or polypeptides: (a) “reference sequence,” (b) “comparison window,” (c) “sequence identity,” (d) “percentage of sequence identity” and (e) “substantial identity.”

As used herein, “reference sequence” is a defined sequence used as a basis for sequence comparison. The reference sequence can be a nucleic acid sequence (e.g., any of the SEQ ID NO:2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22, and 26 cDNA sequences) or an amino acid sequence (e.g., any of the SEQ ID NO:1, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21, and 25 amino acid sequences). A reference sequence may be a subset or the entirety of a specified sequence. For example, a reference sequence may be a segment of a full-length cDNA or of a genomic DNA sequence, or the complete cDNA or complete genomic DNA sequence, or a domain of a polypeptide sequence.

As used herein, “comparison window” refers to a contiguous and specified segment of a nucleic acid or an amino acid sequence, wherein the nucleic acid/amino acid sequence can be compared to a reference sequence and wherein the portion of the nucleic acid/amino acid sequence in the comparison window may comprise additions or deletions (i.e., gaps) compared to the reference sequence (which does not comprise additions or deletions) for optimal alignment of the two sequences. The comparison window can vary for nucleic acid and polypeptide sequences. Generally, for nucleic acids, the comparison window is at least 16 contiguous nucleotides in length, and optionally can be 18, 20, 30, 40, 50, 100 or more nucleotides. For amino acid sequences, the comparison window is at least about 15 amino acids, and can optionally be 20, 30, 40, 50, 100 or more amino acids. Those of skill in the art understand that to avoid a high similarity to a reference sequence due to inclusion of gaps in the nucleic acid or amino acid sequence, a gap penalty is typically introduced and is subtracted from the number of matches.

Methods of alignment of nucleotide and amino acid sequences for comparison are well known in the art. The local homology algorithm (BESTFIT) of Smith and Waterman, (1981) Adv. Appl. Math 2:482, may permit optimal alignment of compared sequences; by the homology alignment algorithm (GAP) of Needleman and Wunsch, (1970) J. Mol. Biol. 48:443-53; by the search for similarity method (Tfasta and Fasta) of Pearson and Lipman, (1988) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85:2444; by computerized implementations of these algorithms, including, but not limited to: CLUSTAL in the PC/Gene program by Intelligenetics, Mountain View, Calif., GAP, BESTFIT, BLAST, FASTA and TFASTA in the Wisconsin Genetics Software Package, Version 8 (available from Genetics Computer Group (GCG™ programs (Accelrys, Inc., San Diego, Calif.)). The CLUSTAL program is well described by Higgins and Sharp (1988) Gene 73:237-44; Higgins and Sharp, (1989) CABIOS 5:151-3; Corpet, et al., (1988) Nucleic Acids Res. 16:10881-90; Huang, et al., (1992) Computer Applications in the Biosciences 8:155-65 and Pearson, et al., (1994) Meth. Mol. Biol. 24:307-31. An example of a good program to use for optimal global alignment of multiple sequences is PileUp (Feng and Doolittle, (1987) J. Mol. Evol., 25:351-60, which is similar to the method described by Higgins and Sharp, (1989) CABIOS 5:151-53 (and is hereby incorporated by reference). The BLAST family of programs that can be used for database similarity searches includes: BLASTN for nucleotide query sequences against nucleotide database sequences; BLASTX for nucleotide query sequences against protein database sequences; BLASTP for protein query sequences against protein database sequences; TBLASTN for protein query sequences against nucleotide database sequences; and TBLASTX for nucleotide query sequences against nucleotide database sequences. See, Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, Chapter 19, Ausubel, et al., eds., Greene Publishing and Wiley-Interscience, New York (1995).

GAP uses the algorithm of Needleman and Wunsch, (1970) J. Mol. Biol. 48:443-53, to find the alignment of two complete sequences that maximizes the number of matches and minimizes the number of gaps. GAP considers all possible alignments and gap positions and creates the alignment with the largest number of matched bases and the fewest gaps. It allows for the provision of a gap creation penalty and a gap extension penalty in units of matched bases. GAP makes a profit of gap creation penalty number of matches for each gap it inserts. If a gap extension penalty greater than zero is chosen, GAP must, in addition, make a profit for each gap inserted of the length of the gap times the gap extension penalty. Default gap creation penalty values and gap extension penalty values in Version 10 of the Wisconsin Genetics Software Package are 8 and 2, respectively. The gap creation and gap extension penalties can be expressed as an integer selected from the group of integers consisting of from 0 to 100. Thus, for example, the gap creation and gap extension penalties can be 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, 20, 30, 40, 50 or more.

GAP presents one member of the family of best alignments. There may be many members of this family. GAP displays four figures of merit for alignments: Quality, Ratio, Identity and Similarity. The Quality is the metric maximized in order to align the sequences. Ratio is the quality divided by the number of bases in the shorter segment. Percent Identity is the percent of the symbols that actually match. Percent Similarity is the percent of the symbols that are similar. Symbols that are across from gaps are ignored. A similarity is scored when the scoring matrix value for a pair of symbols is greater than or equal to 0.50, the similarity threshold. The scoring matrix used in Version 10 of the Wisconsin Genetics Software Package is BLOSUM62 (see, Henikoff and Henikoff, (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89:10915).

Unless otherwise stated, sequence identity/similarity values provided herein refer to the value obtained using the BLAST 2.0 suite of programs using default parameters (Altschul, et al., (1997) Nucleic Acids Res. 25:3389-402).

As those of ordinary skill in the art will understand, BLAST searches assume that proteins can be modeled as random sequences. However, many real proteins comprise regions of nonrandom sequences, which may be homopolymeric tracts, short-period repeats, or regions enriched in one or more amino acids. Such low-complexity regions may be aligned between unrelated proteins even though other regions of the protein are entirely dissimilar. A number of low-complexity filter programs can be employed to reduce such low-complexity alignments. For example, the SEG (Wooten and Federhen, (1993) Comput. Chem. 17:149-63) and XNU (C.sub.1-ayerie and States, (1993) Comput. Chem. 17:191-201) low-complexity filters can be employed alone or in combination.

The terms “substantial identity” indicates that a related nucleic acid comprises a sequence with between 55-100% sequence identity to a reference sequence, with at least 55% sequence identity, or at least 60%, or at least 70%, or at least 80%, or at least 90% or at least 95% sequence identity or any percentage of range between 55-100% sequence identity relative to the reference sequence over a specified comparison window. Optimal alignment may be ascertained or conducted using the homology alignment algorithm of Needleman and Wunsch, supra.

An indication that two polypeptide sequences are substantially identical is that both polypeptides have similar activities. For example, when the polypeptide is related to WRINKLED1, that polypeptide can act as a transcription factor by binding to the same or similar upstream regions of genes normally under the regulatory control of WRINKLED1. For example, transcription factors related to the WRINKLED1 can be identified and/or characterized in assays that involve binding of a test protein (i.e., a potential transcription factor related to a WRINKLED1 factor) to a promoter or regulatory sequence that is bound by a WRINKLED1 factor with any of the sequences recited herein. The related WRINKLED1 polypeptide can also be identified, evaluated or characterized in assays for observing increased (or decreased) expression a set of genes involved in fatty acid (FA) synthesis including, for example, genes for a subunit of pyruvate kinase (Pl-PKβ1), acetyl-CoA carboxylase (BCCP2), acyl carrier protein (ACP1), ketoacyl-acyl carrier protein synthase (KAS1), and combinations thereof.

In some embodiments, a WRINKLED1 transcription factor with a sequence related to any of SEQ ID NO:1, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21, or 25 sequence may not have exactly the same level of activity as the WRINKLED transcription factor with a SEQ ID NO:1, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21, or 55. Instead, the substantially identical polypeptide may exhibit greater or lesser levels of activity than the WRINKLED1 transcription factor with a SEQ ID NO:1, 5, 9, 13, 17, 22, or 25 sequence, as measured by assays available in the art. For example, the substantially identical polypeptide may have at least about 40%, or at least about 50%, or at least about 60%, or at least about 70%, or at least about 80%, or at least about 90%, or at least about 95%, or at least about 97%, or at least about 98%, or at least about 100%, or at least about 105%, or at least about 110%, or at least about 120%, or at least about 130%, or at least about 140%, or at least about 150%, or at least about 200% of the activity of the WRINKLED1 transcription factor with a SEQ ID NO:1, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21, 25, or 29 sequence, when measured by similar assay procedures.

Alternatively, substantial identity is present when second polypeptide is immunologically reactive with antibodies raised against the first polypeptide (e.g., a polypeptide with SEQ ID NO:1, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21, 25, or 29 sequence). Thus, a polypeptide is substantially identical to a first polypeptide, for example, where the two polypeptides differ only by a conservative substitution. In addition, a polypeptide can be substantially identical to a first polypeptide when they differ by a non-conservative change if the epitope that the antibody recognizes is substantially identical. Polypeptides that are “substantially similar” share sequences as noted above except that some residue positions, which are not identical, may differ by conservative amino acid changes.

The WRINKLED1 polypeptides of the present invention include at least the first 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 112, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169, 170, 171, 172, 173, 174, 175, 176, 177, 178, 179, 180, 181, 182, 183, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188, 189, 190, 191, 192, 193, 194, 195, 196, 197, 198, or 199 N-terminal amino acid residues of a the SEQ ID NO:1, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21, or 25 sequence.

Transgenic Plants

In order to engineer plants with increased vegetative tissue oil content that, one of skill in the art can introduce nucleic acids encoding the stable WRINKLED1 transcription factors described herein into the plants to promote the production of oils.

For example, one of skill in the art can generate genetically-modified plants that contain nucleic acids encoding WRINKLED1 transcription factors within their somatic and/or germ cells. Such genetic modification can be accomplished by procedures available in the art. For example, one of skill in the art can prepare an expression cassette or expression vector that can express one or more encoded WRINKLED1 enzymes. Plant cells can be transformed by the expression cassette or expression vector, and whole plants (and their seeds) can be generated from the plant cells that were successfully transformed with the WRINKLED1 nucleic acids. Some procedures for making such genetically modified plants and their seeds are described below.

Promoters:

The WRINKLED1 nucleic acids can be operably linked to a promoter, which provides for expression of an mRNA expressed from the WRINKLED1 nucleic acids. The promoter can be a promoter functional in plants and/or seeds, and/or it can be a promoter functional during plant growth and development or in a mature plant. The promoter can be a heterologous promoter. As used herein, “heterologous” when used in reference to a gene or nucleic acid refers to a gene or nucleic acid that has been manipulated in some way. For example, a heterologous promoter is a promoter that contains sequences that are not naturally linked to an associated coding region.

A WRINKLED1 nucleic acid is operably linked to the promoter when it is located downstream from the promoter, thereby forming a key portion of an expression cassette.

Promoter regions are typically found in the flanking DNA upstream from the coding sequence in both prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells. A promoter sequence provides for regulation of transcription of the downstream gene sequence and typically includes from about 50 to about 2,000 nucleotide base pairs. Promoter sequences also contain regulatory sequences such as enhancer sequences that can influence the level of gene expression. Some isolated promoter sequences can provide for gene expression of heterologous DNAs, that is a DNA different from the native or homologous DNA.

Promoter sequences are also known to be strong or weak, or inducible. A strong promoter provides for a high level of gene expression, whereas a weak promoter provides a very low level of gene expression. An inducible promoter is a promoter that provides for the turning on and off of gene expression in response to an exogenously added agent, or to an environmental or developmental stimulus. For example, a bacterial promoter such as the P_(tac) promoter can be induced to vary levels of gene expression depending on the level of isothiopropylgalactoside added to the transformed cells. Promoters can also provide for tissue specific or developmental regulation. An isolated promoter sequence that is a strong promoter for heterologous DNAs is advantageous because it provides for a sufficient level of gene expression for easy detection and selection of transformed cells and provides for a high level of gene expression when desired. In some embodiments, the promoter is an inducible promoter and/or a tissue-specific promoter.

Examples of promoters that can be used include, but are not limited to, the CaMV 35S promoter (Odell et al., Nature. 313:810-812 (1985)), or others such as CaMV 19S (Lawton et al., Plant Molecular Biology. 9:315-324 (1987)), nos (Ebert et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 84:5745-5749 (1987)), Adh1 (Walker et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 84:6624-6628 (1987)), sucrose synthase (Yang et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 87:4144-4148 (1990)), α-tubulin, ubiquitin, actin (Wang et al., Mol. Cell. Biol. 12:3399 (1992)), cab (Sullivan et al., Mol. Gen. Genet. 215:431 (1989)), PEPCase (Hudspeth et al., Plant Molecular Biology. 12:579-589 (1989)), the CCR (cinnamoyl CoA:NADP oxidoreductase, EC 1.2.1.44) promoter sequence isolated from Lollium perenne, (or a perennial ryegrass) and/or those associated with the R gene complex (Chandler et al., The Plant Cell. 1:1175-1183 (1989)). Further suitable promoters include the poplar xylem-specific secondary cell wall specific cellulose synthase 8 promoter, cauliflower mosaic virus promoter, the Z10 promoter from a gene encoding a 10 kD zein protein, a Z27 promoter from a gene encoding a 27 kD zein protein, inducible promoters, such as the light inducible promoter derived from the pea rbcS gene (Coruzzi et al., EMBO J. 3:1671 (1971)) and the actin promoter from rice (McElroy et al., The Plant Cell. 2:163-171 (1990)). Seed specific promoters, such as the phaseolin promoter from beans, may also be used (Sengupta-Gopalan, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 83:3320-3324 (1985). Other promoters useful in the practice of the invention are known to those of skill in the art.

Alternatively, novel tissue specific promoter sequences may be employed in the practice of the present invention. cDNA clones from a particular tissue are isolated and those clones which are expressed specifically in that tissue are identified, for example, using Northern blotting. Preferably, the gene isolated is not present in a high copy number, but is relatively abundant in specific tissues. The promoter and control elements of corresponding genomic clones can then be localized using techniques well known to those of skill in the art.

For example, the promoter can be an inducible promoter. Such inducible promoters can be activated by agents such as chemicals, hormones, sugars, metabolites, or by the age or developmental stage of the plant. For example, the promoter can be an ethanol-inducible promoter, a sugar-inducible promoter, a senescence-induced promoter or any promoter activated in vegetative tissues of dicots and monocots. One example of a sugar-inducible promoter is a patatin B33 promoter. Such a patatin B33 promoter can, for example, be used in tuber crops such as cassava, potato, rutabaga, sugar beet, and the like. An example of a sequence for the patatin B33 promoter is as follows (SEQ ID NO:66).

   1 aagcttatgt tgccatatag agtagtttgt gatggtatac   41 ttcataaact ttaacttatg ttaaatttgt aatgataaaa   81 tttttattgt aaattaaaaa ttacttataa aattgggcat  121 tataacatat gaaagacaaa ttgtgttaca tattttactt  161 ttgactttaa tatgaatatt tcaatttaaa tcattgtttt  201 attttctctt tctttttaca ggtataaaag gtgaaaattg  241 aagcaagatt gattgcaagc tatgtgtcac cacgttattg  281 atactttgga agaaattttt acttatatgt ctttgtttag  321 gagtaatatt tgatatgttt tagttagatt ttcttgtcat  361 ttatgcttta gtataatttt agttattttt attatatgat  401 catgggtgaa ttttgataca aatatttttg tcattaaata  441 aattaattta tcacaacttg attactttca gtgacaaaaa  481 atgtattgtc gtagtaccct tttttgttga atatgaataa  521 ttttttttat tttgtgacaa ttgtaattgt cactacttat  561 gataatattt agtgacatat atgtcgtcgg taaaagcaaa  601 cactttcagt gacaaaataa tagatttaat cacaaaatta  641 ttaacctttt ttataataat aaatttatcc ctaatttata  681 catttaagga caaagtattt tttttatata taaaaaatag  721 tctttagtga cgatcgtagt gttgagtcta gaaatcataa  761 tgttgaatct agaaaaatct catgcagtgt aaaataaacc  801 tcaaaaagga cgttcagtcc atagaggggg tgtatgtgac  841 accccaacct cagcaaaaga aaacctccct tcaacaagga  881 catttgcggt gctaaacaat ttcaagtctc atcacacata  921 tatttattat ataatactaa taaagaatag aaaaggaaag  961 gtaaacatca ttaaatcgtc tttgtatatt tttagtgaca 1001 actgattgac gaaatctttt tcgtcacaca aaatttttag 1041 tgacgaaaca tgatttatag atgatgaaat tatttgtccc 1081 tcataatcta atttgttgta gtgatcatta ctcctttgtt 1121 tgttttattt gtcatgttag tccattaaaa aaaaatatct 1161 ctcttcttat gtacgtgaat ggttggaacg gatctattat 1201 ataatactaa taaagaatag aaaaaggaaa gtgagtgagg 1241 ttcgagggag agaatctgtt taatatcaga gtcgatcatg 1281 tgtcaatttt atcgatatga ccctaacttc aactgagttt 1321 aaccaattcc gataaggcga gaaatatcat agtattgagt 1361 ctagaaaaat ctcatgtagt gtggggtaaa cctcagcaag 1401 gacgttgagt ccatagaggg gggtgtatgt gacaccccaa 1441 cctcagcaaa agaaaacctc ccctcaagaa ggacatttgc 1481 ggtgctaaac aatttcaagt ctcatcacac atatatatat 1521 attatataat actaataaat aatagaaaaa ggaaaggtaa 1561 acatcactaa cgacagttgc ggtgcaaact gagtgaggta 1601 ataaacatca ctaactttta ttggttatgt caaactcaaa 1641 gtaaaatttc tcaacttgtt tacgtgccta tatataccat 1681 gcttgttata tgctcaaagc accaacaaaa tttaaaaaca 1721 ctttgaacat ttgcaaaatg gcaactacta aaactttttt 1761 aattttattt tttatgatat tagcaactac tagttcaaca 1801 tgtgctaagt tggaagaaat ggttactgtt ctaagtattg 1841 atggaggtgg aattaaggga atcattccag ctatcattct 1881 cgaatttctt gaaggacaac ttcaggtatt gtaaaaatat 1921 tttttaatgt atgtgcgtaa gtgtgacact actactatag 1961 tcattctggg tacct

A WRINKLED1 nucleic acid can be combined with the promoter by standard methods to yield an expression cassette, for example, as described in Sambrook et al. (Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. Second Edition (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.: Cold Spring Harbor Press (1989); Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. Third Edition (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.: Cold Spring Harbor Press (2000)). Briefly, a plasmid containing a promoter such as the 35S CaMV promoter can be constructed as described in Jefferson (Plant Molecular Biology Reporter 5:387-405 (1987)) or obtained from Clontech Lab in Palo Alto, Calif. (e.g., pBI121 or pBI221). Typically, these plasmids are constructed to have multiple cloning sites having specificity for different restriction enzymes downstream from the promoter. The WRINKLED1 nucleic acids can be subcloned downstream from the promoter using restriction enzymes and positioned to ensure that the DNA is inserted in proper orientation with respect to the promoter so that the DNA can be expressed as sense RNA. Once the WRINKLED1 nucleic acid is operably linked to a promoter, the expression cassette so formed can be subcloned into a plasmid or other vector (e.g., an expression vector).

In some embodiments, a cDNA clone encoding a selected WRINKLED1 protein is isolated from vegetative tissue (e.g., stems, roots, and/or leaves). The cDNA clone encoding a selected WRINKLED1 protein can be isolated from mature plants. In other embodiments, cDNA clones from other species (that encode a WRINKLED1 protein) are isolated from selected plant tissues, or a nucleic acid encoding a mutant or modified WRINKLED1 protein is prepared by available methods or as described herein. For example, the nucleic acid encoding a mutant or modified WRINKLED1 protein can be any nucleic acid with a coding region that hybridizes, for example, to SEQ ID NO:2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22, or 26, and that has WRINKLED1 transcription factor activity.

Using restriction endonucleases, the coding sequence for the selected WRINKLED1 is subcloned downstream of the promoter in a 5′ to 3′ sense orientation.

Targeting Sequences:

Additionally, expression cassettes can be constructed and employed to target the WRINKLED1 transcription factor to an intracellular compartment within plant cells (e.g., the nucleus) or to direct the transcription factor to the extracellular environment (e.g., for collection and/or purification). This can generally be achieved by joining a DNA sequence encoding a transit or signal peptide sequence to the coding sequence of the WRINKLED1 nucleic acid. The resultant transit, or signal, peptide will transport the protein to a particular intracellular, or extracellular destination, respectively, and can then be posttranslational removed. Transit peptides act by facilitating the transport of proteins through intracellular membranes, e.g., vacuole, vesicle, plastid and mitochondrial membranes, whereas signal peptides direct proteins through the extracellular membrane. By facilitating transport of the protein into compartments inside or outside the cell, these sequences can increase the accumulation of a particular gene product in a particular location. For example, see U.S. Pat. No. 5,258,300.

3′ Sequences:

When the expression cassette is to be introduced into a plant cell, the expression cassette can also optionally include 3′ nontranslated plant regulatory DNA sequences that act as a signal to terminate transcription and allow for the polyadenylation of the resultant mRNA. The 3′ nontranslated regulatory DNA sequence preferably includes from about 300 to 1,000 nucleotide base pairs and contains plant transcriptional and translational termination sequences. For example, 3′ elements that can be used include those derived from the nopaline synthase gene of Agrobacterium tumefaciens (Bevan et al., Nucleic Acid Research. 11:369-385 (1983)), or the terminator sequences for the T7 transcript from the octopine synthase gene of Agrobacterium tumefaciens, and/or the 3′ end of the protease inhibitor I or II genes from potato or tomato. Other 3′ elements known to those of skill in the art can also be employed. These 3′ nontranslated regulatory sequences can be obtained as described in An (Methods in Enzymology. 153:292 (1987)). Many such 3′ nontranslated regulatory sequences are already present in plasmids available from commercial sources such as Clontech, Palo Alto, Calif. The 3′ nontranslated regulatory sequences can be operably linked to the 3′ terminus of the WRINKLED1 nucleic acids by standard methods.

Selectable and Screenable Marker Sequences:

In order to improve identification of transformants, a selectable or screenable marker gene can be employed with the WRINKLED1 nucleic acids. “Marker genes” are genes that impart a distinct phenotype to cells expressing the marker gene and thus allow such transformed cells to be distinguished from cells that do not have the marker. Such genes may encode either a selectable or screenable marker, depending on whether the marker confers a trait which one can ‘select’ for by chemical means, i.e., through the use of a selective agent (e.g., a herbicide, antibiotic, or the like), or whether it is simply a trait that one can identify through observation or testing, i.e., by ‘screening’ (e.g., the R-locus trait). Of course, many examples of suitable marker genes are known to the art and can be employed in the practice of the invention.

Included within the terms selectable or screenable marker genes are also genes which encode a “secretable marker” whose secretion can be detected as a means of identifying or selecting for transformed cells. Examples include markers which encode a secretable antigen that can be identified by antibody interaction, or secretable enzymes that can be detected by their catalytic activity. Secretable proteins fall into a number of classes, including small, diffusible proteins detectable, e.g., by ELISA; and proteins that are inserted or trapped in the cell wall (e.g., proteins that include a leader sequence such as that found in the expression unit of extensin or tobacco PR-S).

With regard to selectable secretable markers, the use of a gene that encodes a polypeptide that becomes sequestered in the cell wall, where the polypeptide includes a unique epitope may be advantageous. Such a secreted antigen marker can employ an epitope sequence that would provide low background in plant tissue, a promoter-leader sequence that imparts efficient expression and targeting across the plasma membrane, and can produce protein that is bound in the cell wall and yet is accessible to antibodies. A normally secreted wall protein modified to include a unique epitope would satisfy such requirements.

Examples of proteins suitable for modification in this manner include extensin or hydroxyproline rich glycoprotein (HPRG). For example, the maize HPRG (Stiefel et al., The Plant Cell. 2:785-793 (1990)) is well characterized in terms of molecular biology, expression, and protein structure and therefore can readily be employed. However, any one of a variety of extensins and/or glycine-rich wall proteins (Keller et al., EMBO J. 8:1309-1314 (1989)) could be modified by the addition of an antigenic site to create a screenable marker.

Possible selectable markers for use in connection with the present invention include, but are not limited to, a neo gene (Potrykus et al., Mol. Gen. Genet. 199:183-188 (1985)) which codes for kanamycin resistance and can be selected for using kanamycin, G418, and the like; a bar gene which codes for bialaphos resistance; a gene which encodes an altered EPSP synthase protein (Hinchee et al., Bio/Technology. 6:915-922 (1988)) thus conferring glyphosate resistance; a nitrilase gene such as bxn from Klebsiella ozaenae which confers resistance to bromoxynil (Stalker et al., Science. 242:419-423 (1988)); a mutant acetolactate synthase gene (ALS) which confers resistance to imidazolinone, sulfonylurea or other ALS-inhibiting chemicals (European Patent Application 154,204 (1985)); a methotrexate-resistant DHFR gene (Thillet et al., J. Biol. Chem. 263:12500-12508 (1988)); a dalapon dehalogenase gene that confers resistance to the herbicide dalapon; or a mutated anthranilate synthase gene that confers resistance to 5-methyl tryptophan. Where a mutant EPSP synthase gene is employed, additional benefit may be realized through the incorporation of a suitable chloroplast transit peptide, CTP (European Patent Application 0 218 571 (1987)).

An illustrative embodiment of a selectable marker gene capable of being used in systems to select transformants is the gene that encode the enzyme phosphinothricin acetyltransferase, such as the bar gene from Streptomyces hygroscopicus or the pat gene from Streptomyces viridochromogenes (U.S. Pat. No. 5,550,318). The enzyme phosphinothricin acetyl transferase (PAT) inactivates the active ingredient in the herbicide bialaphos, phosphinothricin (PPT). PPT inhibits glutamine synthetase, (Murakami et al., Mol. Gen. Genet. 205:42-50 (1986); Twell et al., Plant Physiol. 91:1270-1274 (1989)) causing rapid accumulation of ammonia and cell death. The success in using this selective system in conjunction with monocots was surprising because of the major difficulties that have been reported in transformation of cereals (Potrykus, Trends Biotech. 7:269-273 (1989)).

Screenable markers that may be employed include, but are not limited to, a β-glucuronidase or uidA gene (GUS) that encodes an enzyme for which various chromogenic substrates are known; an R-locus gene, which encodes a product that regulates the production of anthocyanin pigments (red color) in plant tissues (Dellaporta et al., In: Chromosome Structure and Function: Impact of New Concepts, 18^(th) Stadler Genetics Symposium, J. P. Gustafson and R. Appels, eds. (New York: Plenum Press) pp. 263-282 (1988)); a β-lactamase gene (Sutcliffe, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 75:3737-3741 (1978)), which encodes an enzyme for which various chromogenic substrates are known (e.g., PADAC, a chromogenic cephalosporin); a xylE gene (Zukowsky et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 80:1101 (1983)) which encodes a catechol dioxygenase that can convert chromogenic catechols; an α-amylase gene (Ikuta et al., Bio/technology 8:241-242 (1990)); a tyrosinase gene (Katz et al., J. Gen. Microbiol. 129:2703-2714 (1983)) which encodes an enzyme capable of oxidizing tyrosine to DOPA and dopaquinone which in turn condenses to form the easily detectable compound melanin; a β-galactosidase gene, which encodes an enzyme for which there are chromogenic substrates; a luciferase (lux) gene (Ow et al., Science. 234:856-859.1986), which allows for bioluminescence detection; or an aequorin gene (Prasher et al., Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm. 126:1259-1268 (1985)), which may be employed in calcium-sensitive bioluminescence detection, or a green or yellow fluorescent protein gene (Niedz et al., Plant Cell Reports. 14:403 (1995).

For example, genes from the maize R gene complex can be used as screenable markers. The R gene complex in maize encodes a protein that acts to regulate the production of anthocyanin pigments in most seed and plant tissue. Maize strains can have one, or as many as four, R alleles that combine to regulate pigmentation in a developmental and tissue specific manner. A gene from the R gene complex does not harm the transformed cells. Thus, an R gene introduced into such cells will cause the expression of a red pigment and, if stably incorporated, can be visually scored as a red sector. If a maize line carries dominant alleles for genes encoding the enzymatic intermediates in the anthocyanin biosynthetic pathway (C2, A1, A2, Bz1 and Bz2), but carries a recessive allele at the R locus, transformation of any cell from that line with R will result in red pigment formation. Exemplary lines include Wisconsin 22 that contains the rg-Stadler allele and TR112, a K55 derivative that is r-g, b, Pl. Alternatively any genotype of maize can be utilized if the C1 and R alleles are introduced together.

The R gene regulatory regions may be employed in chimeric constructs in order to provide mechanisms for controlling the expression of chimeric genes. More diversity of phenotypic expression is known at the R locus than at any other locus (Coe et al., in Corn and Corn Improvement, eds. Sprague, G. F. & Dudley, J. W. (Am. Soc. Agron., Madison, Wis.), pp. 81-258 (1988)). It is contemplated that regulatory regions obtained from regions 5′ to the structural R gene can be useful in directing the expression of genes, e.g., insect resistance, drought resistance, herbicide tolerance or other protein coding regions. In some embodiments, any of the various R gene family members may be successfully employed (e.g., P, S, Lc, etc.). However, one that can be used is Sn (particularly Sn:bol3). Sn is a dominant member of the R gene complex and is functionally similar to the R and B loci in that Sn controls the tissue specific deposition of anthocyanin pigments in certain seedling and plant cells, therefore, its phenotype is similar to R.

A further screenable marker contemplated for use in the present invention is firefly luciferase, encoded by the lux gene. The presence of the lux gene in transformed cells may be detected using, for example, X-ray film, scintillation counting, fluorescent spectrophotometry, low-light video cameras, photon counting cameras or multiwell luminometry. It is also envisioned that this system may be developed for population screening for bioluminescence, such as on tissue culture plates, or even for whole plant screening.

Elements of the present disclosure are exemplified through the use of particular marker genes. However in light of this disclosure, numerous other possible selectable and/or screenable marker genes will be apparent to those of skill in the art in addition to the one set forth herein below. Therefore, it will be understood that the discussion provided herein is exemplary rather than exhaustive. In light of the techniques disclosed herein and the general recombinant techniques that are known in the art, the present invention readily allows the introduction of any gene, including marker genes, into a recipient cell to generate a transformed plant cell, e.g., a monocot cell or dicot cell.

Other Optional Sequences:

An expression cassette of the invention can also further comprise plasmid DNA. Plasmid vectors include additional DNA sequences that provide for easy selection, amplification, and transformation of the expression cassette in prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells, e.g., pUC-derived vectors such as pUC8, pUC9, pUC18, pUC19, pUC23, pUC119, and pUC120, pSK-derived vectors, pGEM-derived vectors, pSP-derived vectors, or pBS-derived vectors. The additional DNA sequences include origins of replication to provide for autonomous replication of the vector, additional selectable marker genes, such as antibiotic or herbicide resistance, unique multiple cloning sites providing for multiple sites to insert DNA sequences, and/or sequences that enhance transformation of prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells.

Another vector that is useful for expression in both plant and prokaryotic cells is the binary Ti plasmid (as disclosed in Schilperoort et al., U.S. Pat. No. 4,940,838) as exemplified by vector pGA582. This binary Ti plasmid vector has been previously characterized by An (Methods in Enzymology. 153:292 (1987)). This binary Ti vector can be replicated in prokaryotic bacteria such as E. coli and Agrobacterium. The Agrobacterium plasmid vectors can be used to transfer the expression cassette to dicot plant cells and under certain conditions to monocot cells, such as rice cells. The binary Ti vectors preferably include the nopaline T DNA right and left borders to provide for efficient plant cell transformation, a selectable marker gene, unique multiple cloning sites in the T border regions, the colE1 replication of origin and a wide host range replicon. The binary Ti vectors carrying an expression cassette of the invention can be used to transform both prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells, but is preferably used to transform dicot plant cells.

In Vitro Screening of Expression Cassettes:

Once the expression cassette is constructed and subcloned into a suitable plasmid, it can be screened for the ability to express the encoded WRINKLED1 transcription factor(s) by available methods. For example, the WRINKLED protein can bind to upstream sequences in genes such as a subunit of pyruvate kinase (Pl-PKβ1), acetyl-CoA carboxylase (BCCP2), acyl carrier protein (ACP1), and ketoacyl-acyl carrier protein synthase (KAS1). Binding assays to WRI1 binding sites with sequences such as [CnTnG](n)₇[CG], where n is any nucleotide designated as the AW-box, can be employed to detect WRI1 expression. Expression of WRINKLED can also be detected by observing whether an expression cassette or vector encoding a WRINKLED protein can facilitate synthesis of plant carbons into oils (e.g., TCAs).

DNA Delivery of the DNA Molecules into Host Cells: The WRINKLED nucleic acid can be introduced into a recipient cell to create a transformed cell by available methods. The frequency of occurrence of cells taking up exogenous (foreign) DNA can be low, and it is likely that not all recipient cells receiving DNA segments or sequences will result in a transformed cell wherein the DNA is stably integrated into the plant genome and/or expressed. Some may show only initial and transient gene expression. However, cells from virtually any dicot or monocot species can be stably transformed, and those cells can be regenerated into transgenic plants, for example, through the application of the techniques disclosed herein.

Another aspect of the invention is a plant species with increased vegetative tissue oil content, wherein the plant has an introduced WRINKLED1 nucleic acid. The plant can be a monocotyledon or a dicotyledon. Another aspect of the invention includes plant cells (e.g., embryonic cells or other cell lines) that can regenerate fertile transgenic plants. Another aspect of the invention includes transgenic seeds from which transgenic plants can be grown. The plants, cells and seeds can be either monocotyledons or dicotyledons. The cell(s) may be in a suspension cell culture or may be in an intact plant part, such as an immature embryo, or in a specialized plant tissue, such as callus, such as Type I or Type II callus.

Examples of plants, seeds, and/or plant cells that can be modified as described herein to express the stable WRINKLED transcription factors include alfalfa (e.g., forage legume alfalfa), algae, avocado, barley, broccoli, Brussels sprouts, cabbage, canola, cassava, cauliflower, cole vegetables, collards, corn, crucifers, grain legumes, grasses (e.g., forage grasses), jatropa, kale, kohlrabi, maize, miscanthus, mustards, nut sedge, oats, oil firewood trees, oilseeds, potato, radish, rape, rapeseed, rice, rutabaga, sorghum, soybean, sugar beets, sugarcane, sunflower, switchgrass, tobacco, tomato, turnips, and wheat. In some embodiments, the plant is a Brassicaceae or other Solanaceae species. In some embodiments, the plant or cell can be a maize plant or cell. In some embodiments, the plant is not a species of Arabidopsis, for example, in some embodiments the plant is not Arabidopsis thaliana.

Transformation of the cells of the plant tissue source can be conducted by any one of a number of methods known to those of skill in the art. Examples are: Transformation by direct DNA transfer into plant cells by electroporation (U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,384,253 and 5,472,869, Dekeyser et al., The Plant Cell. 2:591-602 (1990)); direct DNA transfer to plant cells by PEG precipitation (Hayashimoto et al., Plant Physiol. 93:857-863 (1990)); direct DNA transfer to plant cells by microprojectile bombardment (McCabe et al., Bio/Technology. 6:923-926 (1988); Gordon-Kamm et al., The Plant Cell. 2:603-618 (1990); U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,489,520; 5,538,877; and 5,538,880) and DNA transfer to plant cells via infection with Agrobacterium. Methods such as microprojectile bombardment or electroporation can be carried out with “naked” DNA where the expression cassette may be simply carried on any E. coli-derived plasmid cloning vector. In the case of viral vectors, it is desirable that the system retain replication functions, but lack functions for disease induction.

One method for dicot transformation, for example, involves infection of plant cells with Agrobacterium tumefaciens using the leaf-disk protocol (Horsch et al., Science 227:1229-1231 (1985). Monocots such as Zea mays can be transformed via microprojectile bombardment of embryogenic callus tissue or immature embryos, or by electroporation following partial enzymatic degradation of the cell wall with a pectinase-containing enzyme (U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,384,253; and 5,472,869). For example, embryogenic cell lines derived from immature Zea mays embryos can be transformed by accelerated particle treatment as described by Gordon-Kamm et al. (The Plant Cell. 2:603-618 (1990)) or U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,489,520; 5,538,877 and 5,538,880, cited above. Excised immature embryos can also be used as the target for transformation prior to tissue culture induction, selection and regeneration as described in U.S. application Ser. No. 08/112,245 and PCT publication WO 95/06128. Furthermore, methods for transformation of monocotyledonous plants utilizing Agrobacterium tumefaciens have been described by Hiei et al. (European Patent 0 604 662, 1994) and Saito et al. (European Patent 0 672 752, 1995).

Methods such as microprojectile bombardment or electroporation are carried out with “naked” DNA where the expression cassette may be simply carried on any E. coli-derived plasmid cloning vector. In the case of viral vectors, it is desirable that the system retain replication functions, but lack functions for disease induction.

The choice of plant tissue source for transformation will depend on the nature of the host plant and the transformation protocol. Useful tissue sources include callus, suspension culture cells, protoplasts, leaf segments, stem segments, tassels, pollen, embryos, hypocotyls, tuber segments, meristematic regions, and the like. The tissue source is selected and transformed so that it retains the ability to regenerate whole, fertile plants following transformation, i.e., contains totipotent cells. Type I or Type II embryonic maize callus and immature embryos are preferred Zea mays tissue sources. Selection of tissue sources for transformation of monocots is described in detail in U.S. application Ser. No. 08/112,245 and PCT publication WO 95/06128.

The transformation is carried out under conditions directed to the plant tissue of choice. The plant cells or tissue are exposed to the DNA or RNA encoding the WRINKLED protein for an effective period of time. This may range from a less than one second pulse of electricity for electroporation to a 2-3 day co-cultivation in the presence of plasmid-bearing Agrobacterium cells. Buffers and media used will also vary with the plant tissue source and transformation protocol. Many transformation protocols employ a feeder layer of suspended culture cells (e.g., tobacco or Black Mexican Sweet corn, for example) on the surface of solid media plates, separated by a sterile filter paper disk from the plant cells or tissues being transformed.

Electroporation:

Where one wishes to introduce DNA by means of electroporation, it is contemplated that the method of Krzyzek et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 5,384,253) may be advantageous. In this method, certain cell wall-degrading enzymes, such as pectin-degrading enzymes, are employed to render the target recipient cells more susceptible to transformation by electroporation than untreated cells. Alternatively, recipient cells can be made more susceptible to transformation, by mechanical wounding.

To effect transformation by electroporation, one may employ either friable tissues such as a suspension cell cultures, or embryogenic callus, or alternatively, one may transform immature embryos or other organized tissues directly. The cell walls of the preselected cells or organs can be partially degraded by exposing them to pectin-degrading enzymes (pectinases or pectolyases) or mechanically wounding them in a controlled manner. Such cells would then be receptive to DNA uptake by electroporation, which may be carried out at this stage, and transformed cells then identified by a suitable selection or screening protocol dependent on the nature of the newly incorporated DNA.

Microprojectde Bombardment:

A further advantageous method for delivering transforming DNA segments to plant cells is microprojectile bombardment. In this method, microparticles may be coated with DNA and delivered into cells by a propelling force. Exemplary particles include those comprised of tungsten, gold, platinum, and the like.

It is contemplated that in some instances DNA precipitation onto metal particles would not be necessary for DNA delivery to a recipient cell using microprojectile bombardment. In an illustrative embodiment, non-embryogenic Black Mexican Sweet (BMS) cells are bombarded with intact cells of the bacteria E. coli or Agrobacterium tumefaciens containing plasmids with the WRINKLED1 nucleic acids engineered for expression in plants. Bacteria were inactivated by ethanol dehydration prior to bombardment. A low level of transient expression of the WRINKLED protein can be observed 24-48 hours following DNA delivery. In addition, stable transformants containing the WRINKLED nucleic acids are recovered following bombardment with either E. coli or Agrobacterium tumefaciens cells. It is contemplated that particles may contain DNA rather than be coated with DNA. Hence particles may increase the level of DNA delivery but are not, in and of themselves, necessary to introduce DNA into plant cells.

An advantage of microprojectile bombardment, in addition to it being an effective means of reproducibly stably transforming monocots, is that the isolation of protoplasts (Christou et al., PNAS. 84:3962-3966 (1987)), the formation of partially degraded cells, or the susceptibility to Agrobacterium infection is not required. An illustrative embodiment of a method for delivering DNA into maize cells by acceleration is a Biolistics Particle Delivery System, which can be used to propel particles coated with DNA or cells through a screen, such as a stainless steel or Nytex screen, onto a filter surface covered with maize cells cultured in suspension (Gordon-Kamm et al., The Plant Cell. 2:603-618 (1990)). The screen disperses the particles so that they are not delivered to the recipient cells in large aggregates. It is believed that a screen intervening between the projectile apparatus and the cells to be bombarded reduces the size of projectile aggregate and may contribute to a higher frequency of transformation, by reducing damage inflicted on the recipient cells by an aggregated projectile.

For bombardment, cells in suspension can be concentrated on filters or solid culture medium. Alternatively, immature embryos or other target cells may be arranged on solid culture medium. The cells to be bombarded are positioned at an appropriate distance below the macroprojectile stopping plate. If desired, one or more screens are also positioned between the acceleration device and the cells to be bombarded. Through the use of techniques set forth here-in one may obtain up to 1000 or more foci of cells transiently expressing a marker gene. The number of cells in a focus which express the exogenous gene product 48 hours post-bombardment often range from about 1 to 10 and average about 1 to 3.

In bombardment transformation, one may optimize the prebombardment culturing conditions and the bombardment parameters to yield the maximum numbers of stable transformants. Both the physical and biological parameters for bombardment can influence transformation frequency. Physical factors are those that involve manipulating the DNA/microprojectile precipitate or those that affect the path and velocity of either the macro- or microprojectiles. Biological factors include all steps involved in manipulation of cells before and immediately after bombardment, the osmotic adjustment of target cells to help alleviate the trauma associated with bombardment, and also the nature of the transforming DNA, such as linearized DNA or intact supercoiled plasmid DNA.

One may wish to adjust various bombardment parameters in small scale studies to fully optimize the conditions and/or to adjust physical parameters such as gap distance, flight distance, tissue distance, and helium pressure. One may also minimize the trauma reduction factors (TRFs) by modifying conditions which influence the physiological state of the recipient cells and which may therefore influence transformation and integration efficiencies. For example, the osmotic state, tissue hydration and the subculture stage or cell cycle of the recipient cells may be adjusted for optimum transformation. Execution of such routine adjustments will be known to those of skill in the art.

An Example of Production and Characterization of Stable Transgenic Maize:

After effecting delivery of one or more WRINKLED nucleic acid(s) to recipient cells by any of the methods discussed above (e.g., in an expression vector), the transformed cells can be identified for further culturing and plant regeneration. As mentioned above, in order to improve the ability to identify transformants, one may desire to employ a selectable or screenable marker gene as, or in addition to, the WRINKLED1 nucleic acids. In this case, one would then generally assay the potentially transformed cell population by exposing the cells to a selective agent or agents, or one would screen the cells for the desired marker gene trait. Alternatively, the introduced (e.g., transgenic) nucleic acids can be detected and/or characterized by use of a nucleic acid probe to detect the presence of an expression cassette and/or expressed RNA. The introduced nucleic acids can also be detected and/or evaluated by sequencing.

Selection:

An exemplary embodiment of methods for identifying transformed cells involves exposing the bombarded cultures to a selective agent, such as a metabolic inhibitor, an antibiotic, herbicide or the like. Cells which have been transformed and have stably integrated a marker gene conferring resistance to the selective agent used, will grow and divide in culture. Sensitive cells will not be amenable to further culturing.

For example, to use the bar-bialaphos or the EPSPS-glyphosate selective system, bombarded tissue is cultured for about 0-28 days on nonselective medium and subsequently transferred to medium containing from about 1-3 mg/1 bialaphos or about 1-3 mM glyphosate, as appropriate. While ranges of about 1-3 mg/1 bialaphos or about 1-3 mM glyphosate can be employed, it is proposed that ranges of at least about 0.1-50 mg/1 bialaphos or at least about 0.1-50 mM glyphosate may be useful. Tissue can be placed on any porous, inert, solid or semi-solid support for bombardment, including but not limited to filters and solid culture medium. Bialaphos and glyphosate are provided as examples of agents suitable for selection of transformants, but the technique of this invention is not limited to them.

An example of a screenable marker trait is the red pigment produced under the control of the R-locus in maize. This pigment may be detected by culturing cells on a solid support containing nutrient media capable of supporting growth at this stage and selecting cells from colonies (visible aggregates of cells) that are pigmented. These cells may be cultured further, either in suspension or on solid media. The R-locus is useful for selection of transformants from bombarded immature embryos. In a similar fashion, the introduction of the C1 and B genes will result in pigmented cells and/or tissues.

The enzyme luciferase is also useful as a screenable marker in the context of the present invention. In the presence of the substrate luciferin, cells expressing luciferase emit light which can be detected on photographic or X-ray film, in a luminometer (or liquid scintillation counter), by devices that enhance night vision, or by a highly light sensitive video camera, such as a photon counting camera. All of these assays are nondestructive and transformed cells may be cultured further following identification. The photon counting camera is especially valuable as it allows one to identify specific cells or groups of cells which are expressing luciferase and manipulate those in real time.

It is further contemplated that combinations of screenable and selectable markers may be useful for identification of transformed cells. For example, selection with a growth inhibiting compound, such as bialaphos or glyphosate at concentrations below those that cause 100% inhibition followed by screening of growing tissue for expression of a screenable marker gene such as luciferase would allow one to recover transformants from cell or tissue types that are not amenable to selection alone. In one example, embryogenic Type II callus of Zea mays L. can be selected with sub-lethal levels of bialaphos. Slowly growing tissue was subsequently screened for expression of the luciferase gene and transformants can be identified.

Regeneration and Seed Production:

Cells that survive the exposure to the selective agent, or cells that have been scored positive in a screening assay, are cultured in media that supports regeneration of plants. One example of a growth regulator that can be used for such purposes is dicamba or 2,4-D. However, other growth regulators may be employed, including NAA, NAA+2,4-D or perhaps even picloram. Media improvement in these and like ways can facilitate the growth of cells at specific developmental stages. Tissue can be maintained on a basic media with growth regulators until sufficient tissue is available to begin plant regeneration efforts, or following repeated rounds of manual selection, until the morphology of the tissue is suitable for regeneration, at least two weeks, then transferred to media conducive to maturation of embryoids. Cultures are typically transferred every two weeks on this medium. Shoot development signals the time to transfer to medium lacking growth regulators.

The transformed cells, identified by selection or screening and cultured in an appropriate medium that supports regeneration, can then be allowed to mature into plants. Developing plantlets are transferred to soilless plant growth mix, and hardened, e.g., in an environmentally controlled chamber at about 85% relative humidity, about 600 ppm CO₂, and at about 25-250 microeinsteins/sec·m² of light. Plants can be matured either in a growth chamber or greenhouse. Plants are regenerated from about 6 weeks to 10 months after a transformant is identified, depending on the initial tissue. During regeneration, cells are grown on solid media in tissue culture vessels. Illustrative embodiments of such vessels are petri dishes and Plant Con™. Regenerating plants can be grown at about 19° C. to 28° C. After the regenerating plants have reached the stage of shoot and root development, they may be transferred to a greenhouse for further growth and testing.

Mature plants are then obtained from cell lines that express the desired trait(s). In some embodiments, the regenerated plants are self-pollinated. In addition, pollen obtained from the regenerated plants can be crossed to seed grown plants of agronomically important inbred lines. In some cases, pollen from plants of these inbred lines is used to pollinate regenerated plants. The trait is genetically characterized by evaluating the segregation of the trait in first and later generation progeny. The heritability and expression in plants of traits selected in tissue culture are of particular importance if the traits are to be commercially useful.

Regenerated plants can be repeatedly crossed to inbred plants in order to introgress the WRINKLED1 nucleic acids into the genome of the inbred plants. This process is referred to as backcross conversion. When a sufficient number of crosses to the recurrent inbred parent have been completed in order to produce a product of the backcross conversion process that is substantially isogenic with the recurrent inbred parent except for the presence of the introduced WRINKLED nucleic acids, the plant is self-pollinated at least once in order to produce a homozygous backcross converted inbred containing the WRINKLED1 nucleic acids. Progeny of these plants are true breeding.

Alternatively, seed from transformed plants regenerated from transformed tissue cultures is grown in the field and self-pollinated to generate true breeding plants.

Seed from the fertile transgenic plants can be evaluated for the presence and/or expression of the WRINKLED1 nucleic acids (or the WRINKLED protein products). Transgenic plant and/or seed tissue can be analyzed for WRINKLED1 expression using standard methods such as SDS polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, liquid chromatography (e.g., HPLC) or other means of detecting a WRINKLED1 protein.

Once a transgenic seed expressing the WRINKLED transcription factor, and having an increase in oil in the plant tissue is identified, the seed can be used to develop true breeding plants. The true breeding plants are used to develop a line of plants with an increase in the percent of oil in the plant tissues while still maintaining other desirable functional agronomic traits. Adding the trait of increased oil/decreased carbohydrate production to the plant can be accomplished by back-crossing with this trait and with plants that do not exhibit these traits and studying the pattern of inheritance in segregating generations.

Those plants expressing the target trait in a dominant fashion are preferably selected. Back-crossing is carried out by crossing the original fertile transgenic plants with a plant from an inbred line exhibiting desirable functional agronomic characteristics while not necessarily expressing the trait of an increased percent of oil in the plant. The resulting progeny are then crossed back to the parent that expresses the increased oil/decreased carbohydrate trait. The progeny from this cross will also segregate so that some of the progeny carry the traits and some do not. This back-crossing is repeated until an inbred line with the desirable functional agronomic traits, and with expression of the trait involving an increase in oil and/or a decrease in carbohydrate in the vegetative tissues of the plant. Such expression of the increased percentage of oil or decreased percentage of carbohydrate in plant tissues can be expressed in a dominant fashion.

Subsequent to back-crossing, the new transgenic plants can be evaluated for an increase in the weight percent of oil (TAG) incorporated into vegetative tissues of the plant. This can be done, for example, by thin layer chromatography (TLC), gas chromatography, gas chromatography-flame ionization detector (GC-FID), electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS), mass spectroscopy, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), high pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC), and/or infrared spectral analysis of plant tissue or by other available methods of detecting and quantifying oils in harvested plant tissues. The new transgenic plants can also be evaluated for a battery of functional agronomic characteristics such as lodging, kernel hardness, yield, resistance to disease, resistance to insect pests, drought resistance, and/or herbicide resistance.

Plants that can be generated by these methods include but are not limited to oil and/or starch plants (canola, potatoes, cassava, lupins, rape, rapeseed, soybean, sunflower and cottonseed), forage plants (alfalfa, clover and fescue), grains (maize, wheat, barley, oats, rice, sorghum, millet and rye), grasses (switchgrass, prairie grass, wheat grass, sudangrass, sorghum, straw-producing plants), softwood, hardwood and other woody plants (e.g., those used for paper production such as poplar species, pine species, and eucalyptus). Examples of plants and/or plant cells that can be modified as described herein include alfalfa (e.g., forage legume alfalfa), algae, avocado, barley, broccoli, Brussels sprouts, cabbage, canola, cassava, cauliflower, cole vegetables, collards, corn, crucifers, grain legumes, grasses (e.g., forage grasses), jatropa, kale, kohlrabi, maize, miscanthus, mustards, nut sedge, oats, oil firewood trees, oilseeds, potato, radish, rape, rapeseed, rice, rutabaga, sorghum, soybean, sugar beets, sugarcane, sunflower, switchgrass, tobacco, tomato, turnips, and wheat. In some embodiments, the plant is a Brassicaceae or other Solanaceae species. In some embodiments, the plant or cell can be a maize plant or cell. In some embodiments, the plant is not a species of Arabidopsis, for example, in some embodiments, the plant is not Arabidopsis thaliana.

Determination of Stably Transformed Plant Tissues:

To confirm the presence of the WRINKLED1 nucleic acids in the regenerating plants, or seeds or progeny derived from the regenerated plant, a variety of assays may be performed. Such assays include, for example, molecular biological assays available to those of skill in the art, such as Southern and Northern blotting and PCR; biochemical assays, such as detecting the presence of a protein product, e.g., by immunological means (ELISAs and Western blots) or by enzymatic function; plant part assays, such as leaf, seed or root assays; and also, by analyzing the phenotype of the whole regenerated plant. In some embodiments, the amount of oil in plant tissues is quantified. Such a quantified oil content can be compared to a control plant, for example, a control plant of the same species that has not be modified to express the WRINKLED1 transcription factor.

Whereas DNA analysis techniques may be conducted using DNA isolated from any part of a plant, RNA may only be expressed in particular cells or tissue types and so RNA for analysis can be obtained from those tissues. PCR techniques may also be used for detection and quantification of RNA produced from the introduced WRINKLED1 nucleic acids. RT-PCR also be used to reverse transcribe expressed RNA into DNA, using enzymes such as reverse transcriptase, and then this DNA can be amplified through the use of conventional PCR techniques. Further information about the nature of the RNA product may be obtained by Northern blotting. This technique will demonstrate the presence of an RNA species and give information about the integrity of that RNA. The presence or absence of an RNA species can also be determined using dot or slot blot Northern hybridizations. These techniques are modifications of Northern blotting and also demonstrate the presence or absence of an RNA species.

Southern blotting, northern blotting and PCR may be used to detect the WRINKLED1 nucleic acid in question. Expression may also be evaluated by specifically identifying the presence or absence of protein products of the introduced WRINKLED1 nucleic acids, by assessing the level of WRINKLED1 mRNA and/or protein expressed, or evaluating the phenotypic changes brought about by their expression.

Assays for the production and identification of specific proteins may make use of physical-chemical, structural, functional, or other properties of the proteins. Unique physical-chemical or structural properties allow the proteins to be separated and identified by electrophoretic procedures, such as native or denaturing gel electrophoresis or isoelectric focusing, or by chromatographic techniques such as ion exchange, liquid chromatography or gel exclusion chromatography. The unique structures of individual proteins offer opportunities for use of specific antibodies to detect their presence in formats such as an ELISA assay. Combinations of approaches may be employed with even greater specificity such as Western blotting in which antibodies are used to locate individual gene products that have been separated by electrophoretic techniques. Additional techniques may be employed to confirm the identity of the WRINKLED1 protein expressed such as evaluation by nucleic acid or amino acid sequencing following purification. The Examples of this application also provide assay procedures for detecting WRINKLED1 activity. Other procedures may be additionally used.

The expression of a WRINKLED gene product can also be determined by evaluating the phenotypic results of its expression. These assays also may take many forms including but not limited to analyzing changes in the chemical composition, morphology, or physiological properties of the plant. Chemical composition of plant tissues may be altered by expression of the WRINKLED1 transcription factor(s).

Cultivation

Seeds, seedlings and plants containing WRINKLED1 nucleic acids can be grown in any medium which supports plant growth such as a commercial media, soil or water (hydroponically). The medium can be supplemented with a source of sugar (sugar source), such as carbohydrate or sugar. Such supplementation can increase the oil content of seedlings and plants containing WRINKLED1 nucleic acids.

As used herein, a source of sugar or a sugar source includes a material that contains or releases sugar. A material that releases sugar can be a material that is digested by agents in the environment that erodes under cultivation conditions, that is formulated for sustained release, or that is a polymer of sugar units. “Sugar” refers to sugars, e.g., fructose, sucrose, and glucose, and to sugar alcohols, e.g., sorbitol.

The medium for growth of plants can contain about 0.1% to about 10% sugar or a source of sugar. The medium for growth of plants can also contain about 0.2% to about 7%, or about 0.5% to about 6%, or about 1% to about 5%, or about 1.5% to about 4%, or about 2% to about 4%, of sugar or a source of sugar.

Kits

A kit is provided that can include a transgenic seed containing WRINKLED1 nucleic acids, as well as instructions for cultivating the seeds, as well the use of any other material or reagent not included in the kit. The kit can also include a medium for growth of the seeds, or for grow of seedlings, or for induction of expression of the WRINKLED1 nucleic acids to generate WRINKLED transcription factors. Such a medium can also include sugar or a source of sugar. The kit can also include fertilizer. Instructions can include text on when and how to induce expression of the WRINKLED1. Variations that can be implemented can also be described in the instructions.

Any of the WRINKLED nucleic acids, polypeptides and/or related nucleic acids and/or polypeptides described herein can be included in a kit. In some embodiments, the kits can include a container that includes a nucleic acid, or a mixture of nucleic acids. Such a nucleic acid or mixture of nucleic acids can be used, for example, to transform plant cells and/or generate transgenic plants. The nucleic acid(s) can encode a WRINKLED1 transcription factor.

The kits can also include more than one container. For example, the kits can include two or more containers, where one container includes a WRINKLED1 nucleic acid, and another container includes other nucleic acids of interest, or other components for transformation of plant cells. For example, the kit can include a container with a WRINKLED1 nucleic acid, where the WRINKLED1 nucleic acid can be part of an expression cassette or an expression vector.

The kits may also include one or more containers of buffers, such as buffers to dilute or stabilize the WRINKLED1 nucleic acids, or transcription buffers, or hybridization buffers, or buffers for measuring WRINKLED activity or compounds for manipulating the nucleic acids, and/or components for isolating the resultant expression cassette that may be integrated into a plant genome.

The components of the kits may be packaged either in aqueous media or in lyophilized form. The containers can be vials, test tubes, flasks, bottles, syringes or other container means, into which a component may be placed, and suitably aliquoted.

Where there is more than one component in the kit, the kit also will generally contain a second, third or other additional container into which the additional components may be separately placed. However, various combinations of components may also be included in one container. The kits of the present invention also will typically include a means for containing the nucleic acids, and any other reagent containers in close confinement for commercial sale. Such containers may include injection or blow-molded plastic packages into which the desired vials are retained.

When the components of the kit are provided in one and/or more liquid solutions, the liquid solution is an aqueous solution, for example, a sterile aqueous solution. The nucleic acids can also be provided as an alcohol precipitate or as dried powder(s). When reagents and/or components are provided as a dry powder, the powder can be reconstituted by the addition of a suitable solvent. It is envisioned that the solvent may also be provided in another container.

In some embodiments, nucleic acids are provided in dried form or suspended in an appropriate buffer or solvent. It is contemplated that 0.1, 1, 5, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100, 120, 120, 130, 140, 150, 160, 170, 180, 190, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700, 800, 900, 1000 μg or nucleic acid can be provided in kits of the invention.

The kits can also include a means for containing the vials in close confinement for commercial sale, such as, e.g., injection and/or blow-molded plastic containers into which the desired vials are retained.

Such kits may also include components that preserve or maintain the nucleic acids or that protect against their degradation. Such components may be DNAse-free or RNAse free. The kits may include containers of DNase or RNase inhibitors. Such kits generally will comprise, in suitable means, distinct containers for each individual reagent or solution.

A kit will also include instructions for employing the kit components as well the use of any other reagent not included in the kit. Instructions may include variations that can be implemented.

Definitions

As used herein, “isolated” means a nucleic acid or polypeptide has been removed from its natural or native cell. Thus, the nucleic acid or polypeptide can be physically isolated from the cell, or the nucleic acid or polypeptide can be present or maintained in another cell where it is not naturally present or synthesized. The isolated nucleic acid or the isolated polypeptide can also be a nucleic acid or protein that is modified but has been introduced into a cell where it is or was naturally present. Thus, a modified isolated nucleic acid or an isolated polypeptide expressed from a modified isolated nucleic acid can be present in a cell along with a wild copy of the (unmodified) natural nucleic acid and along with wild type copies of the (natural) polypeptide.

As used herein, a “native” nucleic acid or polypeptide means a DNA, RNA or amino acid sequence or segment that has not been manipulated in vitro, i.e., has not been isolated, purified, mutated, and/or amplified.

The term “transgenic” when used in reference to a plant or leaf or vegetative tissue or seed for example a “transgenic plant,” transgenic leaf,” “transgenic vegetative tissue,” “transgenic seed,” or a “transgenic host cell” refers to a plant or leaf or tissue or seed that contains at least one heterologous or foreign gene in one or more of its cells. The term “transgenic plant material” refers broadly to a plant, a plant structure, a plant tissue, a plant seed or a plant cell that contains at least one heterologous gene in one or more of its cells.

The term “transgene” refers to a foreign gene that is placed into an organism or host cell by the process of transfection. The term “foreign nucleic acid” or refers to any nucleic acid (e.g., encoding a promoter or coding region) that is introduced into the genome of an organism or tissue of an organism or a host cell by experimental manipulations, such as those described herein, and may include nucleic acid sequences found in that organism so long as the introduced gene does not reside in the same location, as does the naturally occurring gene.

The term “host cell” refers to any cell capable of replicating and/or transcribing and/or translating a heterologous nucleic acid. Thus, a “host cell” refers to any eukaryotic or prokaryotic cell (e.g., plant cells, algal cells, bacterial cells, yeast cells, E. coli, insect cells, etc.), whether located in vitro or in vivo. For example, a host cell may be located in a transgenic plant, or located in a plant part or part of a plant tissue or in cell culture.

As used herein, the term “wild-type” when made in reference to a gene refers to a functional gene common throughout an outbred population. As used herein, the term “wild-type” when made in reference to a gene product refers to a functional gene product common throughout an outbred population. A functional wild-type gene is that which is most frequently observed in a population and is thus arbitrarily designated the “normal” or “wild-type” form of the gene.

As used herein, the term “plant” is used in its broadest sense. It includes, but is not limited to, any species of grass (e.g. turf grass), ornamental or decorative, crop or cereal, fodder or forage, fruit or vegetable, fruit plant or vegetable plant, herb plant, woody plant, flower plant or tree. It is not meant to limit a plant to any particular structure. It also refers to a unicellular plant (e.g. microalga) and a plurality of plant cells that are largely differentiated into a colony (e.g. volvox) or a structure that is present at any stage of a plant's development. Such structures include, but are not limited to, a seed, a tiller, a sprig, a stolen, a plug, a rhizome, a shoot, a stem, a leaf, a flower petal, a fruit, et cetera.

The term “plant tissue” includes differentiated and undifferentiated tissues of plants including those present in roots, shoots, leaves, pollen, seeds and tumors, as well as cells in culture (e.g., single cells, protoplasts, embryos, callus, etc.). Plant tissue may be in planta, in organ culture, tissue culture, or cell culture.

As used herein, the term “plant part” as used herein refers to a plant structure or a plant tissue, for example, pollen, an ovule, a tissue, a pod, a seed, a leaf and a cell. Plant parts may comprise one or more of a tiller, plug, rhizome, sprig, stolen, meristem, crown, and the like. In some instances the plant part can include vegetative tissues of the plant.

Vegetative tissues or vegetative plant parts do not include plant seeds, and instead include non-seed tissues or parts of a plant. The vegetative tissues can include reproductive tissues of a plant, but not the mature seeds.

The term “seed” refers to a ripened ovule, consisting of the embryo and a casing.

The term “propagation” refers to the process of producing new plants, either by vegetative means involving the rooting or grafting of pieces of a plant, or by sowing seeds. The terms “vegetative propagation” and “asexual reproduction” refer to the ability of plants to reproduce without sexual reproduction, by producing new plants from existing vegetative structures that are clones, i.e., plants that are identical in all attributes to the mother plant and to one another. For example, the division of a clump, rooting of proliferations, or cutting of mature crowns can produce a new plant.

The term “heterologous” when used in reference to a nucleic acid refers to a nucleic acid that has been manipulated in some way. For example, a heterologous nucleic acid includes a nucleic acid from one species introduced into another species. A heterologous nucleic acid also includes a nucleic acid native to an organism that has been altered in some way (e.g., mutated, added in multiple copies, linked to a non-native promoter or enhancer sequence, etc.). Heterologous nucleic acids can include cDNA forms of a nucleic acid; the cDNA may be expressed in either a sense (to produce mRNA) or anti-sense orientation (to produce an anti-sense RNA transcript that is complementary to the mRNA transcript). For example, heterologous nucleic acids can be distinguished from endogenous plant nucleic acids in that the heterologous nucleic acids are typically joined to nucleic acids comprising regulatory elements such as promoters that are not found naturally associated with the natural gene for the protein encoded by the heterologous gene. Heterologous nucleic acids can also be distinguished from endogenous plant nucleic acids in that the heterologous nucleic acids are in an unnatural chromosomal location, or are associated with portions of the chromosome not found in nature (e.g., the heterologous nucleic acids are expressed in tissues where the gene is not normally expressed).

The term “expression” when used in reference to a nucleic acid sequence, such as a gene, refers to the process of converting genetic information encoded in a gene into RNA (e.g., mRNA, rRNA, tRNA, or snRNA) through “transcription” of the gene (i.e., via the enzymatic action of an RNA polymerase), and into protein where applicable (as when a gene encodes a protein), through “translation” of mRNA. Gene expression can be regulated at many stages in the process. “Up-regulation” or “activation” refers to regulation that increases the production of gene expression products (i.e., RNA or protein), while “down-regulation” or “repression” refers to regulation that decrease production. Molecules (e.g., transcription factors) that are involved in up-regulation or down-regulation are often called “activators” and “repressors,” respectively.

The terms “in operable combination,” “in operable order,” and “operably linked” refer to the linkage of nucleic acid sequences in such a manner that a nucleic acid molecule capable of directing the transcription of a coding region (e.g., gene) and/or the synthesis of a desired protein molecule is produced. The term also refers to the linkage of amino acid sequences in such a manner so that a functional protein is produced.

Transcriptional control signals in eukaryotes comprise “promoter” and “enhancer” elements. Promoters and enhancers consist of short arrays of DNA sequences that interact specifically with cellular proteins involved in transcription (see, for e.g., Maniatis, et al. (1987) Science 236:1237; herein incorporated by reference). Promoter and enhancer elements have been isolated from a variety of eukaryotic sources including genes in yeast, insect, mammalian and plant cells. Promoter and enhancer elements have also been isolated from viruses and analogous control elements, such as promoters, are also found in prokaryotes. The selection of a particular promoter and enhancer depends on the cell type used to express the protein of interest. Some eukaryotic promoters and enhancers have a broad host range while others are functional in a limited subset of cell types (for review, see Maniatis, et al. (1987), supra; herein incorporated by reference).

The terms “promoter element,” “promoter,” or “promoter sequence” refer to a DNA sequence that is located at the 5′ end of the coding region of a DNA polymer. The location of most promoters known in nature is 5′ to the transcribed region. The promoter functions as a switch, activating the expression of a gene. If the gene is activated, it is said to be transcribed, or is participating in transcription. Transcription involves the synthesis of mRNA from the gene. The promoter, therefore, serves as a transcriptional regulatory element and also provides a site for initiation of transcription of the gene into mRNA.

The term “regulatory region” refers to a gene's 5′ transcribed but untranslated regions, located immediately downstream from the promoter and ending just prior to the translational start of the gene.

The term “promoter region” refers to the region immediately upstream of the coding region of a DNA polymer, and is typically between about 500 by and 4 kb in length, and is preferably about 1 to 1.5 kb in length. Promoters may be tissue specific or cell specific.

The term “tissue specific” as it applies to a promoter refers to a promoter that is capable of directing selective expression of a nucleic acid of interest to a specific type of tissue (e.g., vegetative tissues) in the relative absence of expression of the same nucleic acid of interest in a different type of tissue (e.g., seeds). Tissue specificity of a promoter may be evaluated by, for example, operably linking a reporter gene and/or a reporter gene expressing a reporter molecule, to the promoter sequence to generate a reporter construct, introducing the reporter construct into the genome of a plant such that the reporter construct is integrated into every tissue of the resulting transgenic plant, and detecting the expression of the reporter gene (e.g., detecting mRNA, protein, or the activity of a protein encoded by the reporter gene) in different tissues of the transgenic plant. The detection of a greater level of expression of the reporter gene in one or more tissues relative to the level of expression of the reporter gene in other tissues shows that the promoter is specific for the tissues in which greater levels of expression are detected.

The term “cell type specific” as applied to a promoter refers to a promoter that is capable of directing selective expression of a nucleic acid of interest in a specific type of cell in the relative absence of expression of the same nucleic acid of interest in a different type of cell within the same tissue. The term “cell type specific” when applied to a promoter also means a promoter capable of promoting selective expression of a nucleotide sequence of interest in a region within a single tissue. Cell type specificity of a promoter may be assessed using methods well known in the art, e.g., immunohistochemical staining. Briefly, tissue sections are embedded in paraffin, and paraffin sections are reacted with a primary antibody that is specific for the polypeptide product encoded by the nucleic acid of interest whose expression is controlled by the promoter. A labeled (e.g., peroxidase conjugated) secondary antibody that is specific for the primary antibody is allowed to bind to the sectioned tissue and specific binding detected (e.g., with avidin/biotin) by microscopy.

Promoters may be “constitutive” or “inducible.” The term “constitutive” when made in reference to a promoter means that the promoter is capable of directing transcription of an operably linked nucleic acid in the absence of a stimulus (e.g., heat shock, chemicals, light, etc.). Typically, constitutive promoters are capable of directing expression of a transgene in substantially any cell and any tissue. Exemplary constitutive plant promoters include, but are not limited to Cauliflower Mosaic Virus (CaMV SD; see e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 5,352,605, incorporated herein by reference), mannopine synthase, octopine synthase (ocs), superpromoter (see e.g., WO 95/14098; herein incorporated by reference), and ubi3 promoters (see e.g., Garbarino and Belknap, Plant Mol. Biol. 24:119-127 (1994); herein incorporated by reference). Such promoters have been used successfully to direct the expression of heterologous nucleic acid sequences in transformed plant tissue.

In contrast, an “inducible” promoter is one that is capable of directing a level of transcription of an operably linked nucleic acid in the presence of a stimulus (e.g., heat shock, chemicals, light, etc.) that is different from the level of transcription of the operably linked nucleic acid in the absence of the stimulus.

The term “vector” refers to nucleic acid molecules that transfer DNA segment(s). Transfer can be into a cell, cell to cell, et cetera. The term “vehicle” is sometimes used interchangeably with “vector.” The vector can, for example, be a plasmid. But the vector need not be plasmid.

The following non-limiting Examples illustrate how aspects of the invention have been developed and can be made and used.

Example 1: Materials and Methods

This Example illustrates some methods that can be employed to make and use the invention.

Plant Materials

Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) wild type (Columbia-2 ecotype) and wri1-1 were used in this study. Arabidopsis and N. benthamiana plants were grown in a growth chamber on potting mix at 22° C. with a 16 h light (100-150 μmol m−2 s−1 illumination)/8 h dark photoperiod cycle (Ma et al. PloS one, 8, e68887 (2013)). Arabidopsis transformation, plant growth on plates, seed surface sterilization, and transgenic seedling selection followed methods previously described (Ma et al. PloS one, 8, e68887 (2013)).

Bioinformatic Analysis

Amino acid composition of AtWRI1 was analyzed by Composition Profiler (Vacic et al., BMC Bioinformatics, 8, 211 (2007)). Intrinsically disordered regions were predicted using PONDR-VL3 (Radivojac et al. Pac Symp Biocomput, 216-227 (2003)), PONDR-FIT (Xue et al. Biochim Biophys Acta, 1804, 996-1010 (2010)) and RONN (Yang et al. Bioinformatics, 21, 3369-3376 (2005)). PEST Domain analysis was performed by ePESTfind. Phosphorylation prediction was performed by NetPhos 2.0 (Blom et al. J Mol Biol, 294, 1351-1362 (1999)) and DISPHOS1.3 (Iakoucheva et al. Nucleic Acids Res, 32, 1037-1049 (2004)).

Plasmid Construction

Coding sequence of AtWRI1 (including truncated AtWRI1 variants or site-directed AtWRI1 mutants) were amplified by PCR and subcloned into pENTR4 vector (Life Technologies) to obtain entry constructs. A wild type AtWRI1 with the following amino acid sequence (SEQ ID NO: 29) was employed as a basis for several of the experiments described herein.

1 MKKRLTTSTC SSSPSSSVSS STTTSSPIQS EAPRPKRAKR 41 AKKSSPSGDK SHNPTSPAST RRSSIYRGVT RHRWTGRFEA 81 HLWDKSSWNS IQNKKGKQVY LGAYDSEEAA AHTYDLAALK 121 YWGPDTILNF PAETYTKELE EMQRVTKEEY LASLRRQSSG 161 FSRGVSKYRG VARHHHNGRW EARIGRVFGN KYLYLGTYNT 201 QEEAAAAYDM AAIEYRGANA VTNFDISNYI DRLKKKGVFP 241 FPVNQANHQE GILVEAKQEV ETREAKEEPR EEVKQQYVEE 281 PPQEEEEKEE EKAEQQEAEI VGYSEEAAVV NCCIDSSTIM 321 EMDRCGDNNE LAWNFCMMDT GFSPFLTDQN LANENPIEYP 361 ELFNELAFED NIDFMFDDGK HECLNLENLD CCVVGRESPP 401 SSSSPLSCLS TDSASSTTTT TTSVSCNYLV

A fragment of AtWRI1 was first synthesized with mutations (Integrated DNA Technologies). The following mutant AtWRI1 were generated: AtWRI1^(S398A/S401A/S402A/S407A/S415A/S416A/T420A/T421A/T422A/S423A) (referred to as AtWRI1^(PEST/AA); SEQ ID NO:30):

1 MKKRLTTSTC SSSPSSSVSS STTTSSPIQS EAPRPKRAKR 41 AKKSSPSGDK SHNPTSPAST RRSSIYRGVT RHRWTGRFEA 81 HLWDKSSWNS IQNKKGKQVY LGAYDSEEAA AHTYDLAALK 121 YWGPDTILNF PAETYTKELE EMQRVTKEEY LASLRRQSSG 161 FSRGVSKYRG VARHHHNGRW EARIGRVFGN KYLYLGTYNT 201 QEEAAAAYDM AAIEYRGANA VTNFDISNYI DRLKKKGVFP 241 FPVNQANHQE GILVEAKQEV ETREAKEEPR EEVKQQYVEE 281 PPQEEEEKEE EKAEQQEAEI VGYSEEAAVV NCCIDSSTIM 321 EMDRCGDNNE LAWNFCMMDT GFSPFLTDQN LANENPIEYP 361 ELFNELAFED NIDFMFDDGK HECLNLENLD CCVVGRE A PP 401 AA SSPL A CLS TDSA AA TTT A   AAA VSCNYLV; AtWRI1^(S398D/S401D/S402D/S407D/S415D/S416D/T420D/T421D/T422D/S423D) (referred to as AtWRI1^(PEST/DD); SEQ ID NO:31):

1 MKKRLTTSTC SSSPSSSVSS STTTSSPIQS EAPRPKRAKR 41 AKKSSPSGDK SHNPTSPAST RRSSIYRGVT RHRWTGRFEA 81 HLWDKSSWNS IQNKKGKQVY LGAYDSEEAA AHTYDLAALK 121 YWGPDTILNF PAETYTKELE EMQRVTKEEY LASLRRQSSG 161 FSRGVSKYRG VARHHHNGRW EARIGRVFGN KYLYLGTYNT 201 QEEAAAAYDM AAIEYRGANA VTNFDISNYI DRLKKKGVFP 241 FPVNQANHQE GILVEAKQEV ETREAKEEPR EEVKQQYVEE 281 PPQEEEEKEE EKAEQQEAEI VGYSEEAAVV NCCIDSSTIM 321 EMDRCGDNNE LAWNFCMMDT GFSPFLTDQN LANENPIEYP 361 ELFNELAFED NIDFMFDDGK HECLNLENLD CCVVGRE D PP 401 DD SSPL D CLS TDSA DD TTT D   DDD VSCNYLV

PCR was performed to amplify the full length AtWRI1^(PEST/AA) and AtWRI1^(PEST/DD). Entry constructs were introduced into destination vectors (BiFC vectors, and pEarleyGate binary vectors) through LR reactions (Life Technologies). The BPM1 entry construct was obtained from Arabidopsis Biological Resource Center (ABRC; Cat. No. U24902). A list of the primers employed is shown below.

Primer Name SEQ ID NO: Sequence 5′ to 3′ AtWRI1-FW 5′-AATGGATCCGGACAATGAAGAAGCGCTTA NO: 32 AtWRI1-RV 5′-TCCCTCGAGTCAGACCAAATAGTT NO: 33 AtWRI1^(PEST/AA)-FW 5′-GTAGGATATTCAGAAGAAGCAGCA NO: 34 AtWRI1^(PEST/AA)-RV 5′-TGCTGCTTCTTCTGAATATCCTAC NO: 35 AtWRI1^(4SA)-FW 5′-GCAGCATCTTCACCATTGGCATGCTTATC NO: 36 TACTGACTCTG AtWRI1^(4SA)-RV 5′-AGAGTCAGTAGATAAGCATGCCAATGGTG NO: 37 AAGATGCTGC AtWRI1^(4SD)-FW 5′-GTGGTGGGAAGAGAGGACCCACCCGACGA NO: 38 CTCTTCACCATTGGACTGCTTATCTACTGAC AtWRI1^(4SD)-RV 5′-GTCAGTAGATAAGCAGTCCAATGGTGAAG NO: 39 AGTCGTCGGGTGGGTCCTCTCTTCCCACCAC AtWRI1¹⁻³⁰²-RV 5′-TCCCTCGAGTCATCCTACAATCTCTGCT NO: 40 AtWRI1¹⁻³⁶⁶-RV 5′-TATGCGGCCGCTCATAACTCATTGAATAG NO: 41 CTCCGGATAC AtWRI1¹⁻³⁹⁷-RV 5′-TCCCTCGAGTCACTCTCTTCCCACCACGC NO: 42 AA AtWRI1¹⁻³⁰⁶-RV 5′-TGACTCGAGTCATTCTTCTGAATATCC NO: 43 AtWRI1³⁰⁷⁻⁴³⁰-FW 5′-GCAGGATCCATATGGCAGCAGTGGT NO: 44 AtWRI1³⁰⁷⁻³⁹⁷-RV 5′-GTACTCGAGTCACTCTCTTCCCACCAC NO: 45 AtWRI1³⁰⁷⁻³⁶⁸-RV 5′-GTACTCGAGTCAAAATGCTAACTCATT NO: 46 AtWRI1³⁶⁸⁻⁴³⁰-FW 5′-AATGGATCCGGACAATGTTTGAGGACAAC NO: 47 ATCGACTT AtWRI1^(P3A)-FW 5′-TGGTGGGAAGAGAGAGCGCAGCATCTTCT NO: 48 TCTTCAGCATTGTCTTGCTTATCTACTG AtWRI1^(P3A)-RV 5′-CAGTAGATAAGCAAGACAATGCTGAAGAA NO: 49 GAAGATGCTGCGCTCTCTCTTCCCACCA AtWRI1^(P3L)-FW 5′-TGGTGGGAAGAGAGAGCTTGTTGTCTTC NO: 50 TTCTTCATTGTTGTCTTGCTTATCTACTG-3′ AtWRI1^(P3L)-RV 5′-CAGTAGATAAGCAAGACAACAATGAAGAA NO: 51 GAAGACAACAAGCTCTCTCTTCCCACCA-3′ Transient Expression in N. benthamiana

Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transient expression in N. benthamiana leaves was performed as described previously with slight modification (Vanhercke et al. FEBS Lett, 587, 364-369 (2013)). In brief, A. tumefaciens overnight cultures were centrifuged and re-suspended in MMA buffer (containing 10 mM MES (pH 5.6), 10 mM MgCl₂, and 100 μM acetosyringone) to a concentration of 1.2 OD₆₀₀, and incubated at room temperature for at least 3 hrs. The cell culture was diluted to 0.4 OD₆₀₀ prior to infiltration. Five- to seven-week-old N. benthamiana plants were usually chosen for the experiments.

Confocal microscopy and bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) assays used 35S:YFP-AtWRI1 (including truncated AtWRI1 variants and AtWRI1 site-directed mutants fused to yellow fluorescent protein (YFP)) were generated through GATEWAY system. For BiFC experiments, 35S:nYFP-AtWRI1 (including truncated AtWRI1 variants) and 35S:cYFP-BPM1 were similarly assembled. Constructs were transformed into A. tumefaciens (GV3101 strain). For BiFC experiments to test protein-protein interaction, A. tumefaciens harboring each nYFP and cYFP fusion construct was prepared (each culture was re-suspended to 1.2 OD₆₀₀ in MIVIA buffer) and adjusted to 0.4 OD₆₀₀ prior to injection into plant leaves. Healthy leaves of N. benthamiana plants were infiltrated by bacterial suspensions with a 1-mL blunt-end syringe. Plants were returned to growth chambers and YFP fluorescence signals were captured by a confocal microscope 2 to 3 d after bacterial infiltration. YFP fluorescence signal intensity was analyzed using ImageJ software.

Quantitative Real-Time PCR (qRT-PCR)

RNA extraction and cDNA synthesis followed the methods described by Ma et al. (PloS one, 8, e68887 (2013)). qRT-PCR was performed using the SYBR Green PCR Core Reagents mix (Life Technologies) according to the manufacturer's manual. The expression level of WRI1 target gene was normalized to PP2A gene (internal standard). qRT-PCR primers (YFP) were:

(SEQ ID NO: 52) FW: 5′-AGGGCTATGTGCAGGAGAGA-3′; (SEQ ID NO: 53) RV: 5′- CTTGTGGCCGAGAATGTTTC-3′. The qRT-PCR primers (AtWRI1) were:

(SEQ ID NO: 54) FW: 5′-AGAGCAGTGGTTTCTCCAGAGG-3′; (SEQ ID NO: 55) RV: 5′-TTCCGTTGTGGTGATGCCTAGC-3′. The primers for the PP2A gene that were used for qRT-PCR

(SEQ ID NO: 56) FW: 5′-GACCCTGATGTTGATGTTCGCT-3′; (SEQ ID NO: 57) RV: 5′-GAGGGATTTGAAGAGAGATTTC-3′ were described previously (Liu et al. PloS one, 7, e46451 (2012)). Yeast Transactivation Assay

The transactivation activity of AtWRI1 variants were evaluated by (β-Galactosidase (β-Gal) activity. Both colony-lift filter assay and liquid culture assay were performed according to the Yeast Protocols Handbook (Clonetech). 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-D-galactopyranoside (X-GAL) was used as the substrate for the colony-lift filter assay and o-nitrophenyl-β-D-galactopyranoside (ONPG) was chosen as the substrate for the liquid culture assay.

Cell-Free Degradation Assay

AtWRI1-WT and its variants were subcloned into pDEST15 vector to obtain N-terminal GST tag fused recombinant proteins. Recombinant proteins were expressed in E. coli BL21 (DE3) and induced by 1 mM IPTG at room temperature for 3 h. Protein extraction and purification were as described by Kong et al. (Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 109, E2091-2097 (2012)). Purified proteins were dialyzed against 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 100 mM NaCl, and 10% glycerol. Protein concentration was measured by Bio-Rad protein assay kit (Bio-Rad). The cell-free degradation assay was performed as previously described by Liu and Stone (J Biol Chem, 288, 20267-20279 (2013); and Wang et al. Plant Cell, 21, 2378-2390 (2009)) with slight modifications. Seven-day-old Arabidopsis seedlings were harvested and ground into fine powder in liquid nitrogen. Total protein was extracted using extraction buffer containing 25 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 10 mM NaCl, 10 mM MgCl₂, 5 mM DTT and protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche) and centrifuged at 18000 g at 4° C. for 20 min. The supernatant was collected as total protein extract and protein concentration was determined by Bio-Rad protein assay kit (Bio-Rad). In the degradation assay, 3 μg recombinant protein was mixed with 500 μg total protein extract and 10 mM ATP with or without 10 μM MG132 in a total volume of 300 μL. 50 μL of the reaction mixture was sampled at time points of 0, 30, 60, 120, 240, and 360 min. 10 μL of 6×SDS loading buffer was added and the samples were heated at 95° C. for 5 min to stop the reaction. After SDS-PAGE, recombinant proteins were detected by Western blots using anti-GST-HRP conjugate (Thermo fisher) at 1:2000 dilution followed by chemiluminescence detection using ChemiDoc™ System (Bio-Rad). The band density was analyzed by ImageJ software.

Lipid Analysis

For lipid analysis in N. benthamiana plants, leaves were harvested 5 d after bacterial infiltration (transient expression) and frozen in liquid nitrogen. Frozen leaves were lyophilized prior to lipid analysis. Lipid analysis followed methods described previously by Hara and Radin (Anal Biochem, 90, 420-426 (1978)) and by Li et al. (Phytochemistry, 67, 904-915 (2006)), with slight modification. In brief, lyophilized leaves (20-30 mg) were first incubated in 2 mL preheated isopropanol at 90° C. for 10 min. After cooling to room temperature, leaves were ground by a glass pestle followed by adding 3 mL hexane and vortexing strongly. 2.5 mL 15% (w/v) sodium sulfate was added, again vortexing strongly. After centrifugation, the upper phase was collected and the lower phase re-extracted with hexane:isopropanol (7:2; v/v). The combined upper phases were dried under a stream of nitrogen gas and dissolved in chloroform. Lipid extracts were separated on a thin-layer chromatography (TLC) plate using hexane:diethylether:acetic acid (70:30:1, v/v/v). The TLC plate was sprayed with primuline solution and lipid bands were visualized under UV light. TAG bands, identified by co-migration with standards, were scraped and transferred into a glass tube for transmethylation and analysis by GC. For lipid analysis of Arabidopsis seeds, lipid analysis followed methods described by Ma et al. (PloS one, 8, e68887 (2013)).

Example 2: AtWRI1 Protein Shows Hallmarks of Intrinsic Disorder

To identify intrinsically disordered regions in the AtWRI1 protein, the amino acid composition of AtWRI1 was analyzed using Composition Profiler. Disordered proteins often display amino acid compositional bias (Romero et al. Proteins, 42, 38-48 (2001); Valsecchi et al., Molecular bioSystems, 9, 2282-2295 (2013)) with an abundance of polar residues and depletion of hydrophobic amino acids (Dyson and Wright Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 6, 197-208 (2005)). The AtWRI1 protein is enriched in polar amino acids (Ser (S), Thr (T), Tyr (Y), Cys (C), Asn (N)), while hydrophobic amino acids (Leu (L), Phe (F), Ile (I), Val (V), Met (M)) are depleted (FIG. 1, panel E). These results indicated that AtWRI1 may be intrinsically disordered. A protein disorder predictor (PONDR VL3) indicated that the AtWRI1 protein has a disorder value of 53% (predicted by PONDR VL3) compared to an average of 23% for all Arabidopsis proteins. The protein disorder of several AtWRI1 orthologs including BnWRI1 (B. napus), EgWRI1 (oil palm), ZmWRI1a and ZmWRI1b (Z. mays) was also compared. These WRI1 orthologs consistently displayed a high level of disorder (BnWRI1 (62%), ZmWRI1a (57%), ZmWRI1b (49%) and EgWRI1 (52%) (predicted by PONDR VL3) (FIG. 1 panel F). Taken together, these data show that AtWRI1 proteins have the typical hallmarks of intrinsic disorder.

Example 3: Identification of Intrinsically Disordered Regions (IDRs) in AtWRI1

Additional in silico analyses were performed using three IDR prediction algorithms to identify the major IDRs in AtWRI1. A total of three major IDRs were consistently predicted in AtWRI1 by the three algorithms (FIG. 1 panels A-D). One disordered domain (AtWRI1^(IDR1); also referred to as IDR1) was close to the N-terminus and the other two disordered domains (AtWRI1^(IDR2) and AtWRI1^(IDR3)) were in the C-terminal region of AtWRI1 (FIG. 1 panels A-D and G). The IDR1 region was located between amino acid positions 1 and 83. The AtWRI1^(IDR2) region (also referred to as IDR2) was located between amino acid positions 249 and 313, while the AtWRI1^(IDR3)) region (also referred to as IDR3, was located between amino acid positions 368-430. It should be noted that the different algorithms predicted slight variations in IDR placement (FIG. 1 panel G).

Example 4: IDR3 Domain of AtWRI1 Determines Stability of AtWRI1

The IDR1 and IDR2 regions flank the already well-characterized and functionally-critical AP2 domains. For these experiments, the inventors decided to focus on the analysis of the less characterized C-terminus with its IDR domain (AtWRI1^(IDR3)).

In order to investigate the function of AtWRI1^(IDR3), two truncated AtWRI1 variants were generated with IDR3 removed (AtWRI1¹⁻³⁰² and AtWRI1¹⁻³⁶⁶ having the first 302 and 366 amino acids, respectively). Yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) was fused at the N-terminus of each AtWRI1 variant. These YFP fusions are functional as demonstrated by complementation of the wri1-1 mutation (which expresses a defective WRINKLED transcription factor). For example, as shown in FIG. 2 panel C, the fatty acid content of seeds from AtWRI1¹⁻³⁰² and AtWRI1¹⁻³⁶⁶ transformed plant lines have greater levels of fatty acids than seeds with the wri1-1 mutation. The fatty acid content of seeds expressing the YFP-AtWRI1 wild-type (WT) construct) is also shown in FIG. 2 panel C.

AtWRI1-WT and AtWRI1 C-terminally truncated variants were transiently produced in N. benthamiana leaves. These experiments indicated an approximately 3-fold increase in YFP fluorescence signal intensity of AtWRI1¹⁻³⁰² and AtWRI1¹⁻³⁶⁶ compared to AtWRI1 (FIG. 2 panels A-B). These results therefore provided a first clue that AtWRI1^(IDR3) plays a role in mediating the degradation of AtWRI1. It is unlikely that the increased YFP fluorescence detected in FIG. 2 resulted from YFP released from AtWRI1 because YFP-AtWRI1 fluorescence was nuclear localized, and predominant nuclear localization was not observed in transformations with YFP alone (results not shown).

Example 5: AtWRI1^(IDR3) is not Required for WRI1 Interaction with the E3 Ligase Linker Protein

This Example describes results showing that wild type and variant AtWRI1 proteins interact with the BPM1 protein.

Recently, AtWRI1 was shown to be subject to 26S proteasome mediated degradation by interaction with BTB/POZ-MATH (BPM) proteins (Chen et al. Plant Cell, 25, 2253-2264 (2013)). When BPM proteins complex with transcription factors such as WRINKLED, the transcription factor is destabilized. However, the domain(s) of AtWRI1 responsible for the interaction between AtWRI1 and BPM proteins remain unknown. Because removal of IDR3 of AtWRI1 (AtWRI1^(Δ367-430)) led to increased YFP fluorescence intensity (FIG. 2), the inventors hypothesized that IDR3 of AtWRI1 might be a domain facilitating interaction of AtWRI1 with BPMs.

A bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) assay was used to investigate the interaction between AtWRI1 and a BPM protein (BPM1). AtWRI1 and BPM1 were subcloned to BiFC vectors which generated nYFP-AtWRI1 and cYFP-BPM1 (half N-terminus of YFP and half C-terminus of YFP, respectively). The BiFC assay was performed following transient expression of the constructs in N. benthamiana leaves.

The YFP signal was strong in the nucleus of epidermal cells when nYFP-AtWRI1 and cYFP-BPM1 were co-produced. No YFP fluorescence signal was observed when nYFP-AtWRI1 and cYFP-BPM1 were produced individually. These results indicate that AtWRI1 and BPM1 interacted in planta.

A fluorescence signal was still detected when nYFP-AtWRI1¹⁻³⁶⁶ (removal of IDR3) and cYFP-BPM1 were co-produced in the BiFC assay. These results show that IDR3 of AtWRI1 was not essential for the interaction between AtWRI1 and BPM1 protein. Accordingly, the major domain of AtWRI1 and BPM1 interaction does not reside in amino acids 367-430 of AtWRI1.

Example 6: AtWRI1^(IDR3) Contains One PEST Domain

This Example illustrates that the AtWRI1^(IDR3) region contains a PEST domain.

Given that AtWRI1^(IDR3) is not essential for interaction with BPMs, the inventors investigated other functions of AtWRI1^(IDR3) that may mediate AtWRI1 stability. A PEST domain (amino acid sequence enriched in proline (P), glutamic acid (E), serine (S), and threonine (T)) is considered a proteolytic signal (Rechsteiner and Rogers, Trends Biochem Sci, 21, 267-271 (1996): Rogers et al. Science, 234, 364-368 (1986)) and PEST domains are often found to be associated with IDRs (Singh et al. Proteins, 62, 309-315 (2006)). In silico analysis revealed that AtWRI1 had two PEST domains, one at about amino acid positions 4-34 (RLTTSTC SSSPSSSVSS STTTSSPIQS EAPR, SEQ ID NO:58), and the other at about amino acid positions 395-430 (RESPP SSSSPLSCLS TDSASSTTTT TTSVSCNYLV, SEQ ID NO:59).

Notably, both PEST domains are located in IDRs of AtWRI1 (IDR1 and IDR3 respectively). Given the fact that AtWRI1^(ΔIDR3) resulted in an increase of YFP fluorescence (FIG. 2), the C-terminal PEST domain AtWRI1³⁹⁶⁻⁴³⁰ which is located in IDR3 may be involved in AtWRI1 protein degradation.

Example 7: The Transactivation Domain (TAD) of AtWRI1 Does Not Include the IDR3-PEST Domain

This Example shows that the transactivation domain (TAD) of AtWRI1 does not include the IDR3-PEST region.

Previously it was shown that deletion of the C-terminal 170 amino acids of AtWRI1 (AtWRI1^(Δ261-430)) results in the abolishment of transactivation activity (Masaki et al. Plant & cell physiology, 46, 547-556 (2005)). Removing the PEST domain in AtWRI1^(IDR3) to increase AtWRI1 protein stability may adversely affect the transactivation domain (TAD) of WRI1, also located in the C-terminal portion of the protein.

Experiments were performed to ascertain whether the entire AtWRI1²⁶¹⁻⁴³⁰ domain functions as a TAD or if the TAD of AtWRI1 can be further narrowed down within the C-terminus, and is not overlapping with the PEST domain. To address this question, the inventors used a GAL4-based One-Hybrid System. As shown in FIG. 3, there was no transactivation activity of AtWRI1¹⁻³⁰⁶ carrying a deletion of the C-terminal 124 amino acids.

Therefore, smaller regions within the AtWRI1 C-terminal end (AtWRI1³⁰⁷⁻⁴³⁰) were tested to identify the putative TAD. The amino acid composition of AtWRI1 indicates that residues 307 to 430 of AtWRI1 are enriched in acidic amino acids (FIG. 3A), which are also common to TADs. The AtWRI1³⁰⁷⁻⁴³⁰ deletion mutant maintained strong transactivation activity (FIG. 3B). Importantly, AtWRI1³⁰⁷⁻³⁹⁷ displayed a similar transcriptional activity compared to wild-type AtWRI1, which indicates that the last 33 residues of AtWRI1 (AtWRI1³⁹⁸⁻⁴³⁰) are not required for the AtWRI1 transactivation activity (FIG. 3B). However, deletion of either AtWRI1³⁰⁻³⁶⁸ or AtWRI1³⁶⁹⁻⁴³⁰ showed a strongly reduced transcriptional activity (FIG. 3B). Taken together, these data indicate that the TAD for AtWRI1 is encompassed by AtWRI1³⁰⁷⁻³⁹⁷ and does not overlap with the IDR3-PEST domain.

Example 8: AtWRI1 Degradation In Vitro is Slowed by Removal of IDR3-PEST Domain

This Example describes experiments showing that removal of the C-terminal PEST domain increases the stability of the AtWRI1 protein.

To further identify the residues involved in determining the stability of the AtWRI1 protein and to investigate the AtWRI1 degradation mechanism in vitro, recombinant E. coli—was employed to produce the AtWRI1¹⁻³⁹⁷ protein without the IDR3-PEST domain, and the wild type AtWRI1 protein. These protein preparations were incubated in a cell-free system with total protein extracted from Arabidopsis WT seedlings (in the presence or absence of the 26S proteasome inhibitor MG132).

The E. coli-produced AtWRI1 protein degraded with incubation of the total protein extract (FIGS. 4A and 4B). AtWRI1 protein degradation decreased following the addition of the MG132 proteasome inhibitor into the Arabidopsis WT crude protein extracts. These results indicate that AtWRI1 degradation in cell-free assay displayed 26S proteasome dependence. Importantly, AtWRI1¹⁻³⁹⁷ displayed less degradation compared to AtWRI1 WT at five of six time points assayed in the cell-free assay (FIGS. 4A and 4B), indicating increased stability of AtWRI1¹⁻³⁹⁷. Taken together, the biochemical evidence indicates that the IDR3-PEST domain in AtWRI1 is critical for the stability of AtWRI1.

Example 9: AtWRI1¹⁻³⁹⁷ Enhances Oil Accumulation

This Example shows that deletion of the C-terminal IDR3-PEST domain of AtWRI1 increases oil production in seeds.

The sequence of the AtWRI1¹⁻³⁹⁷ protein is provided below (SEQ ID NO:67).

1 MKKRLTTSTC SSSPSSSVSS STTTSSPIQS EAPRPKRAKR 41 AKKSSPSGDK SHNPTSPAST RRSSIYRGVT RHRWTGRFEA 81 HLWDKSSWNS IQNKKGKQVY LGAYDSEEAA AHTYDLAALK 121 YWGPDTILNF PAETYTKELE EMQRVTKEEY LASLRRQSSG 161 FSRGVSKYRG VARHHHNGRW EARIGRVFGN KYLYLGTYNT 201 QEEAAAAYDM AAIEYRGANA VTNFDISNYI DRLKKKGVFP 241 FPVNQANHQE GILVEAKQEV ETREAKEEPR EEVKQQYVEE 281 PPQEEEEKEE EKAEQQEAEI VGYSEEAAVV NCCIDSSTIM 321 EMDRCGDNNE LAWNFCMMDT GFSPFLTDQN LANENPIEYP 361 ELFNELAFED NIDFMFDDGK HECLNLENLD CCVVGRE

The inventors generated an YFP-AtWRI1¹⁻³⁹⁷ plant expression construct that did not include the IDR3-PEST domain to further characterize the function of the C-terminal region of AtWRI1. When the YFP-AtWRI1¹⁻³⁹⁷ protein is transiently expressed in N. benthamiana assays the YFP fluorescence intensity was increased. qRT-PCR indicated that there was no noticeable difference in transcript levels between YFP-AtWRI1 and YFP-AtWRI1¹⁻³⁹⁷ and therefore the increased fluorescence intensity was not the result of differences in transcript stability.

Comparison of triacylglycerol (TAG) accumulation following YFP-AtWRI1 and YFP-AtWRI1¹⁻³⁹⁷ transient production in N. benthamiana leaves showed that the TAG content in the presence of YFP-AtWRI1¹⁻³⁹⁷ was approximately 2 fold higher than in leaves expressing YFP-AtWRI1 (FIG. 4C). Thus, YFP-AtWRI1¹⁻³⁹⁷ expression resulted in enhanced fluorescence intensity and in increased oil biosynthesis in the N. benthamiana transient assay.

Example 10: Removal of Phosphorylation Sites in the IDR3-PEST Domain Enhances WRI1 Stability

This Example describes experiments evaluating the stability of AtWRI1 with and without the predicted phosphorylation sites in the IDR3-PEST domain.

At present there is no direct experimental evidence for phosphorylation of AtWRI1. To investigate the possible involvement of phosphorylation in AtWRI1 stability, putative phosphorylation sites (Ser/Thr/Tyr (S/T/Y)) of AtWRI1 were identified using NetPhos 2.0 as being those that are underlined and in bold in SEQ ID NO:60 below.

397 E S PP SS SSPL S CLSTDSA SS TTT TTTS VSCNYLV 430 Notably, abundant phosphorylation sites were predicted in AtWRI1^(IDR3) and all were localized in the PEST domain.

Using an indirect but readily feasible approach to investigate a potential role of phosphorylation, a multi-point mutant was generated in which all predicted AtWRI1 PEST phosphorylation sites (AtWRI1^(S398A/S401A/S402A/S407A/S415A/S416A/T420A/T421A/T422A/S423A); abbreviated AtWRI1^(PEST/AA); SEQ ID NO:30) were substituted with alanine (A)). The PEST domain of this AtWRI1^(PEST/AA) transcription factor has the following sequence (SEQ ID NO:61).

397                             E A PP 401 AA SSPL A CLS TDSA AA TTT A   AAA VSCNYLV

The signal intensity in the YFP-AtWRI1^(PEST/AA) was stronger compared to YFP-AtWRI1 in transient expression assays (FIG. 4D), consistent with increased stability of AtWRI1^(PEST/AA). Furthermore, AtWRI1^(PEST/AA) enhanced oil biosynthesis in transient expression assays (FIG. 4E). Stable transgenic wri1-1 plants expressing 35S:AtWRI1 and 35S:AtWRI1^(PEST/AA) were also generated. As shown in FIG. 5, the fatty acid content in seeds of 35S:AtWRI1^(PEST/AA)/wri1-1 transgenic lines (#7 and #9) was higher than 35S:AtWRI1/wri1-1 transgenic lines. Taken together, these results indicate that phosphorylation site mutations in the PEST domain of AtWRI1^(IDR3) lead to increased AtWRI1 stability and increased oil biosynthesis in planta.

Example 11: Phosphorylation Mimics of the IDR3-PEST Domain Do Not Enhance AtWRI1 Stability or Oil Accumulation

To further explore the role of phosphorylation in AtWRI1 stability, the inventors generated a phosphorylation mimic mutant of AtWRI1 (AtWRI1^(S398D/S401D/S402D/S407D/S415D/S416D/T420D/T421D/T422D/S423D); (with the simplified designation “AtWRI1^(PEST/DD)”; SEQ ID NO:31)) by substituting all putative phosphorylation sites in AtWRI1^(PEST) with Asp (D).

Yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) fluorescence and oil production induced by YFP-AtWRI1^(PEST/DD) were examined in N. benthamiana leaves. In contrast to the alanine substitutions, YFP-AtWRI1^(PEST/DD) did not cause an increase in the fluorescence signal (FIG. 4F). Furthermore, TAG production due to the presence of YFP-AtWRI1^(PEST/DD) was not increased as was observed for YFP-AtWRI1 (FIG. 4G). These data indicate that phosphorylation at the C-terminal PEST domain in AtWRI1 may be critical for function or stability of AtWRI1.

DISPHOS 1.3 and NetPhos 2.0 (disorder-enhanced phosphorylation sites prediction programs) was employed to narrow down the residue(s) in the PEST domain affecting AtWRI1 stability. DISPHOS 1.3 and NetPhos 2.0 showed different predictions of phosphorylation sites in the IDR3-PEST domain of AtWRI1. However, four residues (S398/S401/S402/S407) were consistently predicted by both programs—these four are identified in bold and by underlining in the SEQ ID NO:60 below.

397 E S PP SS SSPL S CLSTDSASSTTTTTTSVSCNYLV 430 NetPhos 2.0 397 E S PP SS SSPL S CLSTDSASSTTTTTTSVSCNYLV 430 DISPHOS1.3

An additional putative phosphorylation site mutant of AtWRI1 AtWRI1^(S398A/S401A/S402A/S407A) (AtWRI1^(4SA))) was generated that had the following sequence (SEQ ID NO:62).

1 MKKRLTTSTC SSSPSSSVSS STTTSSPIQS EAPRPKRAKR 41 AKKSSPSGDK SHNPTSPAST RRSSIYRGVT RHRWTGRFEA 81 HLWDKSSWNS IQNKKGKQVY LGAYDSEEAA AHTYDLAALK 121 YWGPDTILNF PAETYTKELE EMQRVTKEEY LASLRRQSSG 161 FSRGVSKYRG VARHHHNGRW EARIGRVFGN KYLYLGTYNT 201 QEEAAAAYDM AAIEYRGANA VTNFDISNYI DRLKKKGVFP 241 FPVNQANHQE GILVEAKQEV ETREAKEEPR EEVKQQYVEE 281 PPQEEEEKEE EKAEQQEAEI VGYSEEAAVV NCCIDSSTIM 321 EMDRCGDNNE LAWNFCMMDT GFSPFLTDQN LANENPIEYP 361 ELFNELAFED NIDFMFDDGK HECLNLENLD CCVVGRE A PP 401 AA SSPL A CLS TDSASSTTTT TTSVSCNYLV The PEST domain of this AtWRI1^(4SA) transcription factor therefore has the following sequence (SEQ ID NO:63).

397 E A PP  AA SSPL A CLS TDSASSTTTT TTSVSCNYLV

In addition, a phosphorylation mimic mutant of AtWRI1 (AtWRI1^(S398D/S401D/S402D/S407D) (AtWRI1^(4SD)) was generated by substituting the four consensus predicted phosphorylation sites in the IDR3-PEST domain of AtWRI1 with Asp (D). The sequence of the AtWRI1^(4SD) protein is provided below (SEQ ID NO:64).

1 MKKRLTTSTC SSSPSSSVSS STTTSSPIQS EAPRPKRAKR 41 AKKSSPSGDK SHNPTSPAST RRSSIYRGVT RHRWTGRFEA 81 HLWDKSSWNS IQNKKGKQVY LGAYDSEEAA AHTYDLAALK 121 YWGPDTILNF PAETYTKELE EMQRVTKEEY LASLRRQSSG 161 FSRGVSKYRG VARHHHNGRW EARIGRVFGN KYLYLGTYNT 201 QEEAAAAYDM AAIEYRGANA VTNFDISNYI DRLKKKGVFP 241 FPVNQANHQE GILVEAKQEV ETREAKEEPR EEVKQQYVEE 281 PPQEEEEKEE EKAEQQEAEI VGYSEEAAVV NCCIDSSTIM 321 EMDRCGDNNE LAWNFCMMDT GFSPFLTDQN LANENPIEYP 361 ELFNELAFED NIDFMFDDGK HECLNLENLD CCVVGRE D PP 401 DD SSPL D CLS TDSASSTTTT TTSVSCNYLV

Transient expression assays indicated that AtWRI1^(4SA) was able to increase AtWRI1 stability (increased YFP signal intensity) and did produce increased TAG biosynthesis in planta (FIGS. 6A-6B). In contrast, the phosphorylation mimic mutant AtWRI1^(4SD) failed to either increase stability or elevate TAG production (FIGS. 6A-6B). Taken together, these results show that AtWRI1^(4SA) is sufficient to generate a more stable AtWRI1 protein and that phosphorylation at Ser-398, 401, 402 and 407 in AtWRI1 contributes to the degradation of AtWRI1.

Hence WRINKLED transcription factors with mutations in PEST domains such as the following can increase oil production in plants, plant cells, and plant seeds.

(SEQ ID NO: 63) E A PP  AA SSPL A CLS TDSASSTTTT TTSVSCNYLV.

Identification of a PEST domain in AtWRI1^(IDR3) and its mutational analysis therefore shows that the PEST domain is at the core of IDR3, and it mediates the degradation of AtWRI1. The PEST domain does not overlap the TAD.

Example 11: IDR3-PEST Proline Residues Do Not Contribute to AtWRI1 Stability

AtWRI1 mutants with alanine or leucine at positions 399, 400, and 405 instead of proline (AtWRI1^(P399A/P400A/P405A) (AtWRI1^(P3A)) and AtWRI1^(P399L/P400L/P405L) (AtWRI1^(P3L))) were generated. The functions of these mutants were analyzed in transient assays. FIGS. 6A-6B show that neither AtWRI1^(P3A) nor AtWRI1^(P3L) led to an increase in TAG biosynthesis compared to AtWRI1. These results show that proline residues in the AtWRI1 IDR3-PEST domain were not essential for determining AtWRI1 stability.

REFERENCES

-   Baud, S., Mendoza, M. S., To, A., Harscoet, E., Lepiniec, L. and     Dubreucq, B. (2007) WRINKLED1 specifies the regulatory action of     LEAFY COTYLEDON2 towards fatty acid metabolism during seed     maturation in Arabidopsis. Plant J, 50, 825-838. -   Blom, N., Gammeltoft, S. and Brunak, S. (1999) Sequence and     structure-based prediction of eukaryotic protein phosphorylation     sites. J Mol Biol, 294, 1351-1362. -   Cernac, A. and Benning, C. (2004) WRINKLED1 encodes an AP2/EREB     domain protein involved in the control of storage compound     biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Plant J, 40, 575-585. -   Chen, L., Lee, J. H., Weber, H., Tohge, T., Witt, S., Roje, S.,     Fernie, A. R. and Hellmann, H. (2013) Arabidopsis BPM Proteins     Function as Substrate Adaptors to a CULLIN3-Based E3 Ligase to     Affect Fatty Acid Metabolism in Plants. Plant Cell, 25, 2253-2264. -   Duek, P. D., Elmer, M. V., van Oosten, V. R. and     Fankhauser, C. (2004) The degradation of HFR1, a putative bHLH class     transcription factor involved in light signaling, is regulated by     phosphorylation and requires COP1. Curr Biol, 14, 2296-2301. -   Dunker, A. K., Brown, C. J., Lawson, J. D., Iakoucheva, L. M. and     Obradovic, Z. (2002) Intrinsic disorder and protein function.     Biochemistry, 41, 6573-6582. -   Dyson, H. J. and Wright, P. E. (2005) Intrinsically unstructured     proteins and their functions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 6, 197-208. -   Evrard, A., Kumar, M., Lecourieux, D., Lucks, J., von     Koskull-Doring, P. and Hirt, H. (2013) Regulation of the heat stress     response in Arabidopsis by MPK6-targeted phosphorylation of the heat     stress factor HsfA2. PeerJ, 1, e59. -   Focks, N. and Benning, C. (1998) wrinkled1: A novel, low-seed-oil     mutant of Arabidopsis with a deficiency in the seed-specific     regulation of carbohydrate metabolism. Plant Physiol, 118, 91-101. -   Gao, J. and Xu, D. (2012) Correlation between posttranslational     modification and intrinsic disorder in protein. Pac Symp Biocomput,     94-103. -   Garcia-Alai, M. M., Gallo, M., Salame, M., Wetzler, D. E.,     McBride, A. A., Paci, M., Cicero, D. O. and de Prat-Gay, G. (2006)     Molecular basis for phosphorylation-dependent, PEST-mediated protein     turnover. Structure, 14, 309-319. -   Hara, A. and Radin, N. S. (1978) Lipid extraction of tissues with a     low-toxicity solvent. Anal Biochem, 90, 420-426. -   Hardtke, C. S., Gohda, K., Osterlund, M. T., Oyama, T., Okada, K.     and Deng, X. W. (2000) HY5 stability and activity in arabidopsis is     regulated by phosphorylation in its COP1 binding domain. EMBO J, 19,     4997-5006. -   Iakoucheva, L. M., Radivojac, P., Brown, C. J., O'Connor, T. R.,     Sikes, J. G., Obradovic, Z. and Dunker, A. K. (2004) The importance     of intrinsic disorder for protein phosphorylation. Nucleic Acids     Res, 32, 1037-1049. -   Kjaersgaard, T., Jensen, M. K., Christiansen, M. W., Gregersen, P.,     Kragelund, B. B. and Skriver, K. (2011) Senescence-associated barley     NAC (NAM, ATAF1,2, CUC) transcription factor interacts with     radical-induced cell death 1 through a disordered regulatory domain.     J Biol Chem, 286, 35418-35429. -   Kong, Q., Pattanaik, S., Feller, A., Werkman, J. R., Chai, C., Wang,     Y., Grotewold, E. and Yuan, L. (2012) Regulatory switch enforced by     basic helix-loop-helix and ACT-domain mediated dimerizations of the     maize transcription factor R. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 109,     E2091-2097. -   Kragelund, B. B., Jensen, M. K. and Skriver, K. (2012) Order by     disorder in plant signaling. Trends in plant science, 17, 625-632. -   Kurotani, A., Tokmakov, A. A., Kuroda, Y., Fukami, Y., Shinozaki, K.     and Sakurai, T. (2014) Correlations between predicted protein     disorder and post-translational modifications in plants.     Bioinformatics. -   Li, Y., Beisson, F., Pollard, M. and Ohlrogge, J. (2006) Oil content     of Arabidopsis seeds: the influence of seed anatomy, light and     plant-to-plant variation. Phytochemistry, 67, 904-915. -   Lindemose, S., O'Shea, C., Jensen, M. K. and Skriver, K. (2013)     Structure, function and networks of transcription factors involved     in abiotic stress responses. Int J Mol Sci, 14, 5842-5878. -   Liu, D., Shi, L., Han, C., Yu, J., Li, D. and Zhang, Y. (2012)     Validation of reference genes for gene expression studies in     virus-infected Nicotiana benthamiana using quantitative real-time     PCR. PloS one, 7, e46451. -   Liu, H. and Stone, S. L. (2013) Cytoplasmic degradation of the     Arabidopsis transcription factor abscisic acid insensitive 5 is     mediated by the RING-type E3 ligase KEEP ON GOING. J Biol Chem, 288,     20267-20279. -   Liu, J., Hua, W., Zhan, G., Wei, F., Wang, X., Liu, G. and     Wang, H. (2010) Increasing seed mass and oil content in transgenic     Arabidopsis by the overexpression of wri1-like gene from Brassica     napus. Plant Physiol Biochem, 48, 9-15. -   Liu, J., Perumal, N. B., Oldfield, C. J., Su, E. W., Uversky, V. N.     and Dunker, A. K. (2006) Intrinsic disorder in transcription     factors. Biochemistry, 45, 6873-6888. -   Liu, Z. P., Galindo, R. L. and Wasserman, S. A. (1997) A role for     CKII phosphorylation of the cactus PEST domain in dorsoventral     patterning of the Drosophila embryo. Genes Dev, 11, 3413-3422. -   Lu, Q. S., Paz, J. D., Pathmanathan, A., Chiu, R. S., Tsai, A. Y.     and Gazzarrini, S. (2010) The C-terminal domain of FUSCA3 negatively     regulates mRNA and protein levels, and mediates sensitivity to the     hormones abscisic acid and gibberellic acid in Arabidopsis. Plant J,     64, 100-113. -   Ma, W., Kong, Q., Arondel, V., Kilaru, A., Bates, P. D., Thrower, N.     A., Benning, C. and Ohlrogge, J. B. (2013) Wrinkled1, a ubiquitous     regulator in oil accumulating tissues from Arabidopsis embryos to     oil palm mesocarp. PloS one, 8, e68887. -   Maeo, K., Tokuda, T., Ayame, A., Mitsui, N., Kawai, T., Tsukagoshi,     H., Ishiguro, S. and Nakamura, K. (2009) An AP2-type transcription     factor, WRINKLED1, of Arabidopsis thaliana binds to the AW-box     sequence conserved among proximal upstream regions of genes involved     in fatty acid synthesis. Plant J, 60, 476-487. -   Marchive C, N. K., To A, Lepiniec L & and Baud S (2014)     Transcriptional regulation of fatty acid production in higher     plants: Molecular bases and biotechnological outcomes. Eur J. Lipid     Sci Technol, 116, 1332-1343. -   Marin, M., Thallmair, V. and Ott, T. (2012) The intrinsically     disordered N-terminal region of AtREM1.3 remorin protein mediates     protein-protein interactions. J Biol Chem, 287, 39982-39991. -   Masaki, T., Mitsui, N., Tsukagoshi, H., Nishii, T., Morikami, A. and     Nakamura, K. (2005) ACTIVATOR of Spomin::LUC1/WRINKLED1 of     Arabidopsis thaliana transactivates sugar-inducible promoters. Plant     & cell physiology, 46, 547-556. -   Meyer, R. D., Srinivasan, S., Singh, A. J., Mahoney, J. E.,     Gharahassanlou, K. R. and Rahimi, N. (2011) PEST motif serine and     tyrosine phosphorylation controls vascular endothelial growth factor     receptor 2 stability and downregulation. Mol Cell Biol, 31,     2010-2025. -   Mitchell, P. J. and Tjian, R. (1989) Transcriptional regulation in     mammalian cells by sequence-specific DNA binding proteins. Science,     245, 371-378. -   Miura, K., Ohta, M., Nakazawa, M., Ono, M. and     Hasegawa, P. M. (2011) ICE1 Ser403 is necessary for protein     stabilization and regulation of cold signaling and tolerance. Plant     J, 67, 269-279. -   Mizoi, J., Ohori, T., Moriwaki, T., Kidokoro, S., Todaka, D.,     Maruyama, K., Kusakabe, K., Osakabe, Y., Shinozaki, K. and     Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. (2013) GmDREB2A;2, a canonical     DEHYDRATION-RESPONSIVE ELEMENT-BINDING PROTEIN2-type transcription     factor in soybean, is posttranslationally regulated and mediates     dehydration-responsive element-dependent gene expression. Plant     Physiol, 161, 346-361. -   Oldfield, C. J., Cheng, Y., Cortese, M. S., Brown, C. J.,     Uversky, V. N. and Dunker, A. K. (2005) Comparing and combining     predictors of mostly disordered proteins. Biochemistry, 44,     1989-2000. -   Pazos, F., Pietrosemoli, N., Garcia-Martin, J. A. and     Solano, R. (2013) Protein intrinsic disorder in plants. Frontiers in     plant science, 4, 363. -   Pouvreau, B., Baud, S., Vernoud, V., Morin, V., Py, C., Gendrot, G.,     Pichon, J. P., Rouster, J., Paul, W. and Rogowsky, P. M. (2011)     Duplicate maize Wrinkled1 transcription factors activate target     genes involved in seed oil biosynthesis. Plant Physiol, 156,     674-686. -   Radivojac, P., Obradovic, Z., Brown, C. J. and Dunker, A. K. (2003)     Prediction of boundaries between intrinsically ordered and     disordered protein regions. Pac Symp Biocomput, 216-227. -   Rechsteiner, M. and Rogers, S. W. (1996) PEST sequences and     regulation by proteolysis. Trends Biochem Sci, 21, 267-271. -   Rogers, S., Wells, R. and Rechsteiner, M. (1986) Amino acid     sequences common to rapidly degraded proteins: the PEST hypothesis.     Science, 234, 364-368. -   Romero, P., Obradovic, Z., Li, X., Garner, E. C., Brown, C. J. and     Dunker, A. K. (2001) Sequence complexity of disordered protein.     Proteins, 42, 38-48. -   Ruuska, S. A., Girke, T., Benning, C. and Ohlrogge, J. B. (2002)     Contrapuntal networks of gene expression during Arabidopsis seed     filling. Plant Cell, 14, 1191-1206. -   Sakuma, Y., Maruyama, K., Osakabe, Y., Qin, F., Seki, M.,     Shinozaki, K. and Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. (2006a) Functional     analysis of an Arabidopsis transcription factor, DREB2A, involved in     drought-responsive gene expression. Plant Cell, 18, 1292-1309. -   Sakuma, Y., Maruyama, K., Qin, F., Osakabe, Y., Shinozaki, K. and     Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. (2006b) Dual function of an Arabidopsis     transcription factor DREB2A in water-stress-responsive and     heat-stress-responsive gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 103,     18822-18827. -   Salmeron, A., Janzen, J., Soneji, Y., Bump, N., Kamens, J.,     Allen, H. and Ley, S. C. (2001) Direct phosphorylation of NF-kappaB1     p105 by the IkappaB kinase complex on serine 927 is essential for     signal-induced p105 proteolysis. J Biol Chem, 276, 22215-22222. -   Sanjaya, Durrett, T. P., Weise, S. E. and Benning, C. (2011)     Increasing the energy density of vegetative tissues by diverting     carbon from starch to oil biosynthesis in transgenic Arabidopsis.     Plant biotechnology journal, 9, 874-883. -   Shen, B., Allen, W. B., Zheng, P., Li, C., Glassman, K., Ranch, J.,     Nubel, D. and Tarczynski, M. C. (2010) Expression of ZmLEC1 and     ZmWRI1 increases seed oil production in maize. Plant Physiol, 153,     980-987. -   Singh, G. P., Ganapathi, M., Sandhu, K. S. and Dash, D. (2006)     Intrinsic unstructuredness and abundance of PEST motifs in     eukaryotic proteomes. Proteins, 62, 309-315. -   Sirichandra, C., Davanture, M., Turk, B. E., Zivy, M., Valot, B.,     Leung, J., and Merlot, S. (2010) The Arabidopsis ABA-activated     kinase OST1 phosphorylates the bZIP transcription factor ABF3 and     creates a 14-3-3 binding site involved in its turnover. PloS one, 5,     e13935. -   Tsai, A. Y. and Gazzarrini, S. (2012) AKIN10 and FUSCA3 interact to     control lateral organ development and phase transitions in     Arabidopsis. Plant J, 69, 809-821. -   Vacic, V., Uversky, V. N., Dunker, A. K. and Lonardi, S. (2007)     Composition Profiler: a tool for discovery and visualization of     amino acid composition differences. BMC Bioinformatics, 8, 211. -   Valsecchi, I., Guittard-Crilat, E., Maldiney, R., Habricot, Y.,     Lignon, S., Lebrun, R., Miginiac, E., Ruelland, E., Jeannette, E.     and Lebreton, S. (2013a) The intrinsically disordered C-terminal     region of Arabidopsis thaliana TCP8 transcription factor acts both     as a transactivation and self-assembly domain. Molecular bioSystems,     9, 2282-2295. -   Valsecchi, I., Guittard-Crilat, E., Maldiney, R., Habricot, Y.,     Lignon, S., Lebrun, R., Miginiac, E., Ruelland, E., Jeannette, E.     and Lebreton, S. (2013b) The intrinsically disordered C-terminal     region of Arabidopsis thaliana TCP8 transcription factor acts both     as a transactivation and self-assembly domain. Mol Biosyst, 9,     2282-2295. -   Vanhercke, T., El Tahchy, A., Shrestha, P., Zhou, X. R.,     Singh, S. P. and Petrie, J. R. (2013) Synergistic effect of WRI1 and     DGAT1 coexpression on triacylglycerol biosynthesis in plants. FEBS     Lett, 587, 364-369. -   Wang, F., Zhu, D., Huang, X., Li, S., Gong, Y., Yao, Q., Fu, X.,     Fan, L. M. and Deng, X. W. (2009) Biochemical insights on     degradation of Arabidopsis DELLA proteins gained from a cell-free     assay system. Plant Cell, 21, 2378-2390. -   Ward, J. J., Sodhi, J. S., McGuffin, L. J., Buxton, B. F. and     Jones, D. T. (2004) Prediction and functional analysis of native     disorder in proteins from the three kingdoms of life. J Mol Biol,     337, 635-645. -   Wu, X. L., Liu, Z. H., Hu, Z. H. and Huang, R. Z. (2014) BnWRI1     coordinates fatty acid biosynthesis and photosynthesis pathways     during oil accumulation in rapeseed. J Integr Plant Biol, 56,     582-593. -   Xue, B., Dunbrack, R. L., Williams, R. W., Dunker, A. K. and     Uversky, V. N. (2010) PONDR-FIT: a meta-predictor of intrinsically     disordered amino acids. Biochim Biophys Acta, 1804, 996-1010. -   Yamaguchi, M., Ohtani, M., Mitsuda, N., Kubo, M., Ohme-Takagi, M.,     Fukuda, H. and Demura, T. (2010) VND-INTERACTING2, a NAC domain     transcription factor, negatively regulates xylem vessel formation in     Arabidopsis. Plant Cell, 22, 1249-1263. -   Yang, Z. R., Thomson, R., McNeil, P. and Esnouf, R. M. (2005) RONN:     the bio-basis function neural network technique applied to the     detection of natively disordered regions in proteins.     Bioinformatics, 21, 3369-3376. -   Yin, Y., Wang, Z. Y., Mora-Garcia, S., Li, J., Yoshida, S.,     Asami, T. and Chory, J. (2002) BES1 accumulates in the nucleus in     response to brassinosteroids to regulate gene expression and promote     stem elongation. Cell, 109, 181-191. -   Zhai, Q., Yan, L., Tan, D., Chen, R., Sun, J., Gao, L., Dong, M. Q.,     Wang, Y. and Li, C. (2013) Phosphorylation-coupled proteolysis of     the transcription factor MYC2 is important for jasmonate-signaled     plant immunity. PLoS genetics, 9, e1003422.

All patents and publications referenced or mentioned herein are indicative of the levels of skill of those skilled in the art to which the invention pertains, and each such referenced patent or publication is hereby specifically incorporated by reference to the same extent as if it had been incorporated by reference in its entirety individually or set forth herein in its entirety. Applicants reserve the right to physically incorporate into this specification any and all materials and information from any such cited patents or publications.

The following statements summarize and describe aspects of the invention.

STATEMENTS

-   -   1. A transcription factor with at least 90% amino acid sequence         identity to any of SEQ ID NOs: 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13,         15, 16, 17, 19, 20, 21, 23, 24, 25, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 59, 60,         61, 62, 63, 65, or 67 wherein the transcription factor is         mutated to have at least one amino acid substitution, amino acid         deletion, or amino acid insertion compared to a corresponding         wild type (or native) amino acid sequence.     -   2. The transcription factor of statement 1, wherein the         transcription factor is mutated to have at least one amino acid         substitution, amino acid deletion, or amino acid insertion in a         PEST domain of the transcription factor.     -   3. The transcription factor of statement 1 or 2, wherein the         transcription factor is mutated to have at least four of amino         acid substitutions, amino acid deletions, or amino acid         insertions in a PEST domain of the transcription factor compared         to a corresponding wild type (or native) PEST amino acid         sequence.     -   4. The transcription factor of any of statements 1-3, comprising         a mutant PEST domain comprising any of SEQ ID NOs: 4, 8, 12, 16,         20, 24, or 28, wherein each X is a small amino acid or a         hydrophobic amino acid.     -   5. The transcription factor of any of statements 1-4, comprising         a mutant PEST domain comprising any of SEQ ID NOs: 4, 8, 12, 16,         20, 24, or 28, wherein each X is not an acidic amino acid,         serine, or threonine.     -   6. The transcription factor of any of statements 1-5, comprising         a mutant PEST domain comprising any of SEQ ID NOs: 4, 8, 12, 16,         20, 24, or 28, wherein each X is separately alanine, glycine,         valine, leucine, isoleucine, methionine, or any mixture thereof.     -   7. A transcription factor comprising or consisting of a sequence         selected from SEQ ID NO:30, 62, or 67.     -   8. A nucleic acid encoding the transcription factor of any of         statements 1-7.     -   9. An expression cassette or expression vector encoding the         transcription factor of any of statements 1-7.     -   10. The expression cassette or expression vector of statement 9,         further comprising a promoter operably linked to a nucleic acid         segment that encodes the transcription factor.     -   11. The expression cassette or expression vector of statement 9         or 10, wherein the promoter is a constitutive or an inducible         promoter.     -   12. The expression cassette or expression vector of any of         statements 9-11, wherein the promoter is a developmentally         regulated promoter.     -   13. The expression cassette or expression vector of any of         statements 9-12, wherein the promoter is a poplar xylem-specific         secondary cell wall specific cellulose synthase 8 promoter,         cauliflower mosaic virus promoter, Z10 promoter from a gene         encoding a 10 kD zein protein, Z27 promoter from a gene encoding         a 27 kD zein protein, pea rbcS gene, actin promoter from rice,         CaMV 35S promoter, CaMV 19S, nos, Adh1, sucrose synthase,         α-tubulin, ubiquitin, actin, cab, PEPCase, the CCR (cinnamoyl         CoA:NADP oxidoreductase, EC 1.2.1.44) promoter sequence isolated         from Lollium perenne (or a perennial ryegrass), promoter from an         R gene complex, a seed-specific promoter, or a phaseolin         promoter.     -   14. A plant cell comprising the transcription factor of any of         statements 1-7.     -   15. A plant cell comprising the nucleic acid of statement 8.     -   16. A plant cell comprising the expression cassette or         expression vector of any of statements 9-13.     -   17. The plant cell of any of statements 14-16, wherein the plant         cell is not an Arabidopsis thaliana plant cell.     -   18. The plant cell of any of statements 14-17, wherein the plant         cell is a food plant cell, vegetable oil plant cell, seed oil         plant cell, forage plant cell, or fodder plant cell.     -   19. The plant cell of any of statements 14-18, wherein the plant         cell is of Brassicaceae or other Solanaceae species.     -   20. The plant cell of any of statements 14-19, wherein the plant         cell is an alfalfa, algae, avocado, barley, broccoli, Brussels         sprouts, cabbage, canola, cassava, cauliflower, cole vegetables,         collards, crucifers, grain legumes, forage grasses, jatropa,         kale, kohlrabi, maize, miscanthus, mustards, nut sedge, oats,         oil firewood trees, oilseeds, potato, radish, rice, rutabaga,         sorghum, soybean, sugar beets, sugarcane, switchgrass, tobacco,         tomato, turnips, or wheat plant cell.     -   21. A seed comprising the transcription factor of any of         statements 1-7.     -   22. A seed comprising the nucleic acid of statement 8.     -   23. A seed comprising the expression cassette or expression         vector of any of statements 9-13.     -   24. The seed of any of statements 21-23, wherein the seed is not         an Arabidopsis thaliana plant cell.     -   25. The seed of any of statements 21-24, wherein the seed is a         food plant seed, vegetable oil plant seed, seed oil plant seed,         forage plant seed, or fodder plant seed.     -   26. The seed of any of statements 21-25, wherein the seed is of         Brassicaceae or other Solanaceae species.     -   27. The seed of any of statements 21-26, wherein the seed is an         alfalfa, algae, avocado, barley, broccoli, Brussels sprouts,         cabbage, canola, cassava, cauliflower, cole vegetables,         collards, crucifers, grain legumes, forage grasses, jatropa,         kale, kohlrabi, maize, miscanthus, mustards, nut sedge, oats,         oil firewood trees, oilseeds, potato, radish, rice, rutabaga,         sorghum, soybean, sugar beets, sugarcane, switchgrass, tobacco,         tomato, turnips, or wheat seed.     -   28. The seed of any of statements 21-27, wherein the seed has         about 0.5% to about 40%, or about 0.5% to about 35%, or about         0.5% to about 30%, or about 0.5% to about 25%, or about 0.5% to         about 20%, or about 1% to about 18%, or about 2% to about 15%,         or about 3% to about 15%, or about 5% to about 15% oil content.     -   29. The seed of any of statements 21-28, wherein the seed has at         least about 1.2-fold, at least about 1.5-fold, least about         2-fold, at least about 3-fold, at least about 4-fold, at least         about 5-fold, at least about 7-fold, at least about 10-fold, at         least about 12-fold, at least about 15-fold, more oil, as         measured by percent oil per dry weight, than a seed of the same         species that has not been modified to contain the transcription         factor, nucleic acid, expression cassette, or expression vector.     -   30. A plant comprising the transcription factor of any of         statements 1-7.     -   31. A plant comprising the nucleic acid of statement 8.     -   32. A plant comprising the expression cassette or expression         vector of any of statements 9-13.     -   33. The plant of any of statements 30-32, wherein the plant is         not an Arabidopsis thaliana plant.     -   34. The plant of any of statements 30-33, wherein the plant is a         food plant, vegetable oil plant, seed oil plant, forage plant,         or fodder plant.     -   35. The plant of any of statements 30-34, wherein the plant is         Brassicaceae or other Solanaceae species.     -   36. The plant of any of statements 30-35, wherein the plant is         an alfalfa, algae, avocado, barley, broccoli, Brussels sprouts,         cabbage, canola, cassava, cauliflower, cole vegetables,         collards, crucifers, grain legumes, forage grasses, jatropa,         kale, kohlrabi, maize, miscanthus, mustards, nut sedge, oats,         oil firewood trees, oilseeds, potato, radish, rice, rutabaga,         sorghum, soybean, sugar beets, sugarcane, switchgrass, tobacco,         tomato, turnips, or wheat plant.     -   37. The plant of any of statements 30-36, wherein the plant         tissues of the plant have about 0.5% to about 40%, or about 0.5%         to about 35%, or about 0.5% to about 30%, or about 0.5% to about         25%, or about 0.5% to about 20%, or about 1% to about 18%, or         about 2% to about 15%, or about 3% to about 15%, or about 5% to         about 15% oil content.     -   38. The plant of any of statements 30-37, wherein the seed has         at least about 1.2-fold, at least about 1.5-fold, least about         2-fold, at least about 3-fold, at least about 4-fold, at least         about 5-fold, at least about 7-fold, at least about 10-fold, at         least about 12-fold, or at least about 15-fold, more oil in its         plant tissues, as measured by percent oil per dry weight, than a         plant of the same species that has not been modified to contain         the nucleic acid, expression cassette, or expression vector.     -   39. A method of generating oil comprising isolating tissues or         seeds from the plant of any of statements 30-38 and extracting         oil from the tissues or seeds.     -   40. The method of statement 39, further comprising cultivating a         seed comprising a nucleic acid encoding the transcription factor         of any of statements 1-7 to generate the plant.     -   41. The method of statement 39 or 40, further comprising         cultivating a seed comprising a nucleic acid encoding the         transcription factor of any of statements 1-6, the nucleic acid         of statement 7, or the expression cassette or expression vector         of any of statements 8-12.     -   42. The method of any of statements 39-41, further comprising         generating at least one line of plants comprising a nucleic acid         encoding the transcription factor of any of statements 1-7, the         nucleic acid of statement 8, or the expression cassette or         expression vector of any of statements 9-13.     -   43. The method of statement 42, wherein the at least one line of         plants is generated by transforming one or more plant cells with         the nucleic acid encoding the transcription factor of any of         statements 1-7, or the nucleic acid of statement 8, or the         expression cassette or expression vector of any of statements         9-13 to generate one or more transgenic plant cells; generating         one or more transgenic plants from the one or more transgenic         plant cells; and clonally or vegetatively propagating at least         one line of transgenic plants.     -   44. The method of any of statements 39-43, wherein the plant is         not an Arabidopsis thaliana plant.     -   45. The method of any of statements 39-44, wherein the plant is         a food plant, vegetable oil plant, seed oil plant, forage plant,         or fodder plant.     -   46. The method of any of statements 39-45, wherein the plant is         of Brassicaceae or other Solanaceae species.     -   47. The method of any of statements 39-46, wherein the plant is         an alfalfa, algae, avocado, barley, broccoli, Brussels sprouts,         cabbage, canola, cassava, cauliflower, cole vegetables,         collards, crucifers, grain legumes, forage grasses, jatropa,         kale, kohlrabi, maize, miscanthus, mustards, nut sedge, oats,         oil firewood trees, oilseeds, potato, radish, rice, rutabaga,         sorghum, soybean, sugar beets, sugarcane, switchgrass, tobacco,         tomato, turnips, or wheat plant.

The specific compositions and methods described herein are representative, exemplary and not intended as limitations on the scope of the invention. Other objects, aspects, and embodiments will occur to those skilled in the art upon consideration of this specification, and are encompassed within the spirit of the invention as defined by the scope of the claims. It will be readily apparent to one skilled in the art that varying substitutions and modifications may be made to the invention disclosed herein without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention. The terms and expressions that have been employed are used as terms of description and not of limitation, and there is no intent in the use of such terms and expressions to exclude any equivalent of the features shown and described or portions thereof, but it is recognized that various modifications are possible within the scope of the invention as claimed. Thus, it will be understood that although the present invention has been specifically disclosed by embodiments and optional features, modification and variation of the concepts herein disclosed may be resorted to by those skilled in the art, and that such modifications and variations are considered to be within the scope of this invention as defined by the appended claims and statements of the invention.

The invention illustratively described herein may be practiced in the absence of any element or elements, or limitation or limitations, which is not specifically disclosed herein as essential. The methods and processes illustratively described herein may be practiced in differing orders of steps, and the methods and processes are not necessarily restricted to the orders of steps indicated herein or in the claims.

As used herein and in the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” include plural reference unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Thus, for example, a reference to “a compound” or “a catalyst” or “a ligand” includes a plurality of such compounds, catalysts or ligands, and so forth. In this document, the term “or” is used to refer to a nonexclusive or, such that “A or B” includes “A but not B,” “B but not A,” and “A and B,” unless otherwise indicated.

Under no circumstances may the patent be interpreted to be limited to the specific examples or embodiments or methods specifically disclosed herein. Under no circumstances may the patent be interpreted to be limited by any statement made by any Examiner or any other official or employee of the Patent and Trademark Office unless such statement is specifically and without qualification or reservation expressly adopted in a responsive writing by Applicants.

The invention has been described broadly and generically herein. Each of the narrower species and subgeneric groupings falling within the generic disclosure also form part of the invention. This includes the generic description of the invention with a proviso or negative limitation removing any subject matter from the genus, regardless of whether or not the excised material is specifically recited herein. In addition, where features or aspects of the invention are described in terms of Markush groups, those skilled in the art will recognize that the invention is also thereby described in terms of any individual member or subgroup of members of the Markush group.

The Abstract is provided to comply with 37 C.F.R. § 1.72(b) to allow the reader to quickly ascertain the nature and gist of the technical disclosure. The Abstract is submitted with the understanding that it will not be used to interpret or limit the scope or meaning of the claims. 

What is claimed:
 1. A modified transcription factor having increased stability, comprising: a protein comprising amino acid sequence SEQ ID NO: 1 modified to have a deletion of at least 10 amino acids between amino acid positions 368-430 of SEQ ID NO:1, or a protein comprising sequence SEQ ID NO:1 modified to have one or more substitutions of the X residues of SEQ NO:4; a protein comprising amino acid sequence SEQ ID NO:5 modified to have a deletion of at least 10 amino acids within C-terminal sequence SEQ ID NO:7, or a protein comprising SEQ NO:5 modified to have one or more substitutions of the X residues of SEQ ID NO:8; a protein comprising amino acid sequence SEQ ID NO:9 modified to have a deletion of at least 10 amino acids within C-terminal sequence SEQ ID NO:11, or a protein comprising SEQ ID NO:9 modified to have one or more substitutions of the X residues of SEQ ID NO:12; a protein comprising amino acid sequence SEQ ID NO:13 modified to have a deletion of at least 10 amino acids within C-terminal sequence SEQ ID NO:15, or a protein comprising SEQ ID NO:13 modified to have one or more substitutions of the X residues of SEQ ID NO:16; a protein comprising amino acid sequence SEQ ID NO:17 modified to have a deletion of at least 10 amino acids within C-terminal sequence SEQ ID NO:19, or a protein comprising SEQ ID NO:17 modified to have one or more substitutions of the X residues of SEQ ID NO:20; a protein comprising amino acid sequence SEQ ID NO:21 modified to have a deletion of at least 10 amino acids within C-terminal sequence SEQ NO:23, or a protein comprising SEQ NO:21 modified to have one or more substitutions of the X residues of SEQ ID NO:24; or a protein comprising amino acid sequence SEQ ID NO:25 modified to have a deletion of at least 10 amino acids within C-terminal sequence SEQ ID NO:27, or a protein comprising SEQ ID NO:25 modified to have one or more substitutions of the X residues of SEQ ID NO:28; wherein at least 1.5-fold increased oil content is present in plant tissues when the modified transcription factor is expressed in the plant tissues, and wherein each X residue is separately alanine, glycine, valine, leucine, isoleucine, or methionine.
 2. The modified transcription factor of claim 1 comprising: a. an AtWRI1¹⁻³⁹⁷ protein with a sequence consisting of SEQ ID NO:67; b. an IDR3-PEST domain having SEQ ID NO:61; c. an IDR3-PEST domain having SEQ ID NO:63; or d. a protein comprising SEQ ID NO:62.
 3. The modified transcription factor of claim 1, wherein one or more deletion is of at least 30 amino acids.
 4. A nucleic acid encoding the modified transcription factor of claim
 1. 5. An expression cassette comprising a promoter operably linked to a nucleic acid encoding the modified transcription factor of claim
 1. 6. A plant comprising an expression cassette comprising a promoter operably linked to a nucleic acid encoding the modified transcription factor of claim
 1. 7. The plant of claim 6, wherein the plant is a food plant, vegetable oil plant, seed oil plant, forage plant, or fodder plant.
 8. A plant seed comprising an expression cassette comprising a promoter operably linked to a nucleic acid encoding the modified transcription factor of claim
 1. 9. The plant seed of claim 8, wherein the plant seed is from a food plant, vegetable oil plant, seed oil plant, forage plant, or fodder plant.
 10. A method of generating oil comprising isolating tissues or seeds from the plant of claim 6, and extracting oil from the isolated tissues or seeds.
 11. A method of generating oil comprising extracting oil from the seed(s) of claim
 8. 